World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
38432
World Ranking
10363
National Ranking
5331

Computer Science

D-Index
78
Citations
28733
World Ranking
1185
National Ranking
630

Christopher G. Chute publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher G. Chute sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 420 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Christopher G. Chute D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher G. Chute sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher G. Chute is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans a number of subfields, including Infectious Diseases, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology.

The research topics covered by Christopher G. Chute include:

  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

The recent publications associated with their research are diverse and cover multiple aspects within medical informatics and disease classification. Notable papers include:

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2021, published in 2020 in Nucleic Acids Research
  • The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment, published in 2020 in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • ICD-11: an international classification of diseases for the twenty-first century, published in 2021 in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
  • Association Between Immune Dysfunction and COVID-19 Breakthrough Infection After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the US, published in 2021 in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2024: phenotypes around the world, published in 2023 in Nucleic Acids Research

Frequent collaborators in their research activities include Melissa Haendel, Emily Pfaff, Richard A. Moffitt, Julie A. McMurry, and Andrew T. Girvin.

Christopher G. Chute's work has been published extensively in a variety of venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
  • JAMA Network Open

Best Publications

  • Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications

    Guergana K Savova;James J Masanz;Philip V Ogren;Jiaping Zheng

  • CheXpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison

    Jeremy Irvin;Pranav Rajpurkar;Michael Ko;Yifan Yu

  • Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges.

    Joseph E. Oesterling;Steven J. Jacobsen;Christopher G. Chute;Harry A. Guess

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2021

    Sebastian Köhler;Michael Gargano;Nicolas Matentzoglu;Leigh C. Carmody

  • Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data

    Joshua C. Denny;Lisa Bastarache;Marylyn D. Ritchie;Robert J. Carroll

  • BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse

    Natalya Fridman Noy;Nigam H. Shah;Patricia L. Whetzel;Benjamin Dai

  • Validity of self-reported waist and hip circumferences in men and women.

    Eric B. Rimm;Meir J. Stampfer;Graham A. Colditz;Christopher G. Chute

  • A Prospective Study of Dietary Fat and Risk of Prostate Cancer

    Edward Giovannucci;Eric B. Rimm;Graham A. Colditz;Meir J. Stampfer

  • The prevalence of Prostatism: A Population-Based Survey of Urinary Symptoms

    C.G. Chute;C.G. Chute;L.A. Panser;L.A. Panser;C.J. Girman;C.J. Girman;J.E. Oesterling;J.E. Oesterling

  • The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies.

    Catherine A McCarty;Rex L Chisholm;Christopher G Chute;Iftikhar J Kullo

  • An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval

    Yiming Yang;Christopher G. Chute

  • Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain

    Ted Pedersen;Serguei V. S. Pakhomov;Siddharth Patwardhan;Christopher G. Chute

  • The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future

    Omri Gottesman;Helena Kuivaniemi;Gerard Tromp;W. Andrew Faucett

  • The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, Design, Infrastructure, and Deployment.

    Melissa A Haendel;Melissa A Haendel;Christopher G Chute;Tellen D Bennett;David A Eichmann

  • Major Morbidity and Mortality Within 1 Month of Ambulatory Surgery and Anesthesia

    Mark A. Warner;Sondra E. Shields;Christopher G. Chute

  • Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Rajini Katipamula;Amy C. Degnim;Tanya Hoskin;Judy C. Boughey

  • ICD-11: an international classification of diseases for the twenty-first century.

    James E. Harrison;Stefanie Weber;Robert Jakob;Christopher G. Chute

  • Validation of Electronic Medical Record-Based Phenotyping Algorithms: Results and Lessons Learned From the eMERGE Network

    Katherine M. Newton;Peggy L. Peissig;Abel Ngo Kho;Suzette J. Bielinski

  • Electronic Medical Records for Genetic Research: Results of the eMERGE Consortium

    Abel N. Kho;Jennifer A. Pacheco;Peggy L. Peissig;Luke Rasmussen

  • Use of diverse electronic medical record systems to identify genetic risk for type 2 diabetes within a genome-wide association study

    Abel N. Kho;M. Geoffrey Hayes;Laura Rasmussen-Torvik;Jennifer A. Pacheco

  • The Content Coverage of Clinical Classifications

    Christopher G. Chute;Simon P. Cohn;Keith E. Campbell;Diane E. Oliver

  • BioPortal: Ontologies and Integrated Data Resources at the Click of a Mouse

    Patricia L. Whetzel;Nigam H. Shah;Natalya F. Noy;Benjamin Dai

Frequent Co-Authors

Jyotishman Pathak
Jyotishman Pathak Cornell University
Joshua C. Denny
Joshua C. Denny National Institutes of Health
Hongfang Liu
Hongfang Liu The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Guergana Savova
Guergana Savova Harvard University
Gail P. Jarvik
Gail P. Jarvik University of Washington
Harry A. Guess
Harry A. Guess University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joseph E. Oesterling
Joseph E. Oesterling University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dan M. Roden
Dan M. Roden Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Marylyn D. Ritchie
Marylyn D. Ritchie University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a wide variety of online degree programs and career paths. Many students consider accelerated cs degree options to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner, making these programs a popular choice for those looking to quickly gain in-demand skills.

Outside of computer science, related fields such as environmental and engineering disciplines are also highly sought after. Understanding what can i do with an environmental science degree can inspire students interested in both technology and sustainability, providing them with a sense of the broad impact they can have.

For those more interested in the intersection of technology and engineering, it's worth considering environmental engineering schools online as well as evaluating mechanical engineering degree cost to find accessible programs that fit your budget.

Whether you want to specialize in software, environmental solutions, or technical engineering, there are a wealth of online pathways to help you achieve your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher G. Chute

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles