World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen E. Chick

Stephen E. Chick

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5460
World Ranking
13022
National Ranking
332

Stephen E. Chick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen E. Chick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 101 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen E. Chick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen E. Chick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen E. Chick is affiliated with INSEAD in France and is active in the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance. Their research contributions include a focus on statistical methods, healthcare operations, and economic evaluations.

The scientist's publication record spans various topics and venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • ICU capacity management during the COVID-19 pandemic using a process simulation, 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • Bayesian Sequential Learning for Clinical Trials of Multiple Correlated Medical Interventions, 2021, Management Science
  • Interventions to reduce the risk of surgically transmitted Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a cost-effective modelling review, 2020, Health Technology Assessment
  • ICU Capacity Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Stochastic Process Simulation, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Diffusion of competing rumours on social media, 2020, Journal of Simulation

The frequent co-authors working with Stephen E. Chick include:

  • Andres Alban
  • Danielle Sent
  • Dave A. Dongelmans
  • Alexander P. J. Vlaar
  • Noah Gans

Stephen E. Chick has published extensively in the following venues:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Management Science
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Clinical Trials
  • Health Technology Assessment

The main fields of study for their research are:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • General Health Professions

Their primary research topics include:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Best Publications

  • Simulation Budget Allocation for Further Enhancing theEfficiency of Ordinal Optimization

    Chun-Hung Chen;Jianwu Lin;Enver Yücesan;Stephen E. Chick

  • A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies

    Alan Brennan;Stephen E. Chick;Ruth Davies

  • New Two-Stage and Sequential Procedures for Selecting the Best Simulated System

    Stephen E. Chick;Koichiro Inoue

  • Selecting a Selection Procedure

    Jürgen Branke;Stephen E. Chick;Christian Schmidt

  • Input Distribution Selection for Simulation Experiments: Accounting for Input Uncertainty

    Stephen E. Chick

  • Sequential Sampling to Myopically Maximize the Expected Value of Information

    Stephen E. Chick;Jürgen Branke;Christian Schmidt

  • New Procedures to Select the Best Simulated System Using Common Random Numbers

    Stephen E. Chick;Koichiro Inoue

  • Opportunity Cost and OCBA Selection Procedures in Ordinal Optimization for a Fixed Number of Alternative Systems

    Donghai He;S.E. Chick;Chun-Hung Chen

  • Economic Analysis of Simulation Selection Problems

    Stephen E. Chick;Noah Gans

  • Sequential Sampling with Economics of Selection Procedures

    Stephen E. Chick;Peter Frazier

  • Bayesian analysis for simulation input and output

    Stephen E. Chick

  • Guest editors' introduction to special issue on the first INFORMS simulation society research workshop

    Stephen E. Chick;Enver Yücesan

  • Methods and measures for the description of epidemiologic contact networks.

    Christopher S. Riolo;James S. Koopman;Stephen E. Chick

  • Analysis and simulation of a stochastic, discrete-individual model of STD transmission with partnership concurrency.

    Stephen E. Chick;Andrew L. Adams;James S. Koopman

  • Selecting the best system: a decision-theoretic approach

    Stephen E. Chick

  • Optimal Hiring and Retention Policies for Heterogeneous Workers Who Learn

    Alessandro Arlotto;Stephen E. Chick;Noah Gans

  • Reducing parameter uncertainty for stochastic systems

    Szu Hui Ng;Stephen E. Chick

  • Steps to implement Bayesian input distribution selection

    Stephen E. Chick

  • Ranking and Selection: Efficient Simulation Budget Allocation

    Chun-Hung Chen;Stephen E. Chick;Loo Hay Lee;Nugroho A. Pujowidianto

  • New developments in ranking and selection: an empirical comparison of the three main approaches

    Jürgen Branke;Stephen E. Chick;Christian Schmidt

  • Information Elicitation and Influenza Vaccine Production

    Stephen E. Chick;Sameer Hasija;Javad Nasiry

  • Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference

    Todd Huschka;Stephen E. Chick

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph H. Loch
Christoph H. Loch University of Navarra
Jürgen Branke
Jürgen Branke University of Warwick
Peter I. Frazier
Peter I. Frazier Cornell University
Lawrence M. Leemis
Lawrence M. Leemis William & Mary
Russell R. Barton
Russell R. Barton Pennsylvania State University
Shane G. Henderson
Shane G. Henderson Cornell University
Chun-Hung Chen
Chun-Hung Chen George Mason University
Lee W. Schruben
Lee W. Schruben University of California, Berkeley
Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson University of Melbourne
Wade D. Cook
Wade D. Cook York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and career paths. Many students explore adjacent disciplines, such as engineering, data science, and physics, to further diversify their skillsets and career prospects.

For those looking to combine technical expertise, pursuing the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree can offer practical insights into how computer science powers real-world applications. Similarly, an online physics bachelor's degree complements computational skills with a strong foundation in analytical thinking and problem-solving.

The intersection of technology and data has made data science one of the fastest-growing career paths. If you are interested in analytics, you may wonder what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to help jumpstart your journey in this in-demand field.

Another promising option is an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering, which can lead to careers at the forefront of innovation and technology. Exploring these related online degrees can expand your opportunities and help you find the best fit for your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen E. Chick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles