World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 30 3537 3155 12 11 90 3544
Computer Science 32 13207 12816 178 177 129 4082

Ek Peng Chew publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ek Peng Chew between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ek Peng Chew published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2017. 15 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2017. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications
1989 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ek Peng Chew: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 0
2005 2
2006 9
2007 8
2008 4
2009 2
2010 9
2011 9
2012 12
2013 13
2014 8
2015 14
2016 11
2017 17
2018 7
2019 0
2020 0
2021 6
2022 3
2023 6
2024 8
2025 7
Total 164
Download as CSV

Ek Peng Chew publications per year - data summary

  • Ek Peng Chew, a Mathematics scholar from National University of Singapore, has 164 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1995 and 2000, with 1 publication each.
  • 13 of the 37 years in the span carry no publications at all (1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.8 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 30 publications, 18% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2001: 6 publications (0.5 per year); 2002-2014: 79 publications (6.1 per year); 2015-2025: 79 publications (7.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ek Peng Chew publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ek Peng Chew sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–91 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 90 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60 90
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Ek Peng Chew publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 42–46 to 537+ publications.
  • Ek Peng Chew, a Mathematics scholar from National University of Singapore, records 90 publications - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Ek Peng Chew, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 172–176 publications range, and Ek Peng Chew ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–146 publications, holding 112 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 47% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 537 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Ek Peng Chew D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ek Peng Chew sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174 30
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Ek Peng Chew D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 57 ranges running from 30 to 86+ D-Index.
  • Ek Peng Chew, a Mathematics scholar from National University of Singapore, records 30 D-Index - the 5th percentile of the discipline.
  • 5% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Ek Peng Chew, and about 95% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Ek Peng Chew ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 30 D-Index, holding 174 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Ek Peng Chew is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a focus on subfields including Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Automotive Engineering, Building and Construction, and Environmental Engineering.

The topics addressed in their scholarly work include Maritime Ports and Logistics, Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization, Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods, Urban and Freight Transport Logistics, Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency, and Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms.

Frequent publication venues for Chew's research include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IISE Transactions, and the European Journal of Operational Research.

Key recent publications encompass the following:

  • Analytics with digital-twinning: A decision support system for maintaining a resilient port, 2021, Decision Support Systems
  • Emerging technology and management research in the container terminals: Trends and the COVID-19 pandemic impacts, 2022, Ocean & Coastal Management
  • Integrated automated guided vehicle dispatching and equipment scheduling with speed optimization, 2022, Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
  • Performance Estimation and Design Optimization of a Congested Automated Container Terminal, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
  • Classification and literature review on the integration of simulation and optimization in maritime logistics studies, 2020, IISE Transactions

Chew collaborates frequently with a group of researchers including Loo Hay Lee, Haobin Li, Kok Choon Tan, and Chenhao Zhou.

Best Publications

  • Perfect decomposition techniques in energy and environmental analysis

    B.W. Ang;F.L. Liu;E.P. Chew

  • An optimization model for storage yard management in transshipment hubs

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan;Yongbin Han

  • An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs

    Lu Zhen;Ek Peng Chew;Loo Hay Lee

  • Travel time analysis for general item location assignment in a rectangular warehouse

    Ek Peng Chew;Loon Ching Tang

  • A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty

    Lu Zhen;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

  • Multi-objective simulation-based evolutionary algorithm for an aircraft spare parts allocation problem

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Suyan Teng;Yankai Chen

  • A yard storage strategy for minimizing traffic congestion in a marine container transshipment hub

    Yongbin Han;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan

  • Finding the non-dominated Pareto set for multi-objective simulation models

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Suyan Teng;David Goldsman

  • Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control

    Lu Zhen;Zhe Liang;Dan Zhuge;Loo Hay Lee

  • SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION OF HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS FOR HIGHWAYS

    E.P. Chew;C.J. Goh;T.F. Fwa

  • A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port

    Xinjia Jiang;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Yongbin Han

  • Joint inventory allocation and pricing decisions for perishable products

    Ek Peng Chew;Chulung Lee;Rujing Liu

  • Port connectivity study: An analysis framework from a global container liner shipping network perspective

    Jianlin Jiang;Jianlin Jiang;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Chee Chun Gan

  • The sample average approximation method for empty container repositioning with uncertainties

    Yin Long;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

  • Order picking systems: Batching and storage assignment strategies

    Loon C. Tang;Ek-Peng Chew

  • Analytics with digital-twinning: A decision support system for maintaining a resilient port

    Chenhao Zhou;Jie Xu;Elise Miller-Hooks;Weiwen Zhou

  • MicroPort: A general simulation platform for seaport container terminals

    Zhuo Sun;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan

  • Optimal computing budget allocation for multi-objective simulation models

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Suyan Teng;David Goldsman

  • Discrete and continuous models for computation of optimal vertical highway alignment

    C.J. Goh;E.P. Chew;T.F. Fwa

  • Mean residual life of lifetime distributions

    L.C. Tang;Y. Lu;E.P. Chew

  • Container Transshipment and Port Competition

    Min Ju Bae;Ek Peng Chew;Loo Hay Lee;Anming Zhang

  • A Simulation Budget Allocation Procedure for Enhancing the Efficiency of Optimal Subset Selection

    Si Zhang;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Jie Xu

  • Vehicle dispatching algorithms for container transshipment hubs

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan;Yuan Wang

  • Optimal Computing Budget Allocation for Particle Swarm Optimization in Stochastic Optimization

    Si Zhang;Jie Xu;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

  • Integrated automated guided vehicle dispatching and equipment scheduling with speed optimization

    Unknown

  • Enhancement of supply chain resilience through inter-echelon information sharing

    Haobin Li;Giulia Pedrielli;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

Frequent Co-Authors

Loo Hay Lee
Loo Hay Lee National University of Singapore
Chun-Hung Chen
Chun-Hung Chen George Mason University
Lu Zhen
Lu Zhen Shanghai University
Kap Hwan Kim
Kap Hwan Kim Pusan National University
Loon Ching Tang
Loon Ching Tang National University of Singapore
Tien Fang Fwa
Tien Fang Fwa National University of Singapore
Christine A. Shoemaker
Christine A. Shoemaker National University of Singapore
Ellis L. Johnson
Ellis L. Johnson Georgia Institute of Technology
B.W. Ang
B.W. Ang National University of Singapore
David Goldsman
David Goldsman Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics opens multiple pathways, including advanced studies and various career options. For those interested in business applications, exploring an MBA is a popular choice. If you’re considering further education, it’s important to understand how can you transfer mba programs credits effectively to optimize time and investment.

Another growing field is data analytics, where a master in data analytics can leverage your mathematical skills for careers in business intelligence, finance, and technology. This degree blends math with real-world data problem-solving, in high demand across industries.

If you prefer a quicker, more accessible route to bolster your qualifications, there are options like the easiest mba program that prioritize streamlined admission and flexible course structures. Such programs cater to professionals balancing work and study.

Furthermore, exploring the easiest mba programs online can provide convenient alternatives that minimize geographical constraints while opening doors to leadership roles informed by strong analytical foundations.

Best Scientists Citing Ek Peng Chew

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles