World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4082
World Ranking
13210
National Ranking
178

Mathematics

D-Index
30
Citations
3544
World Ranking
3536
National Ranking
12

Ek Peng Chew publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ek Peng Chew sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 90 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Ek Peng Chew D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ek Peng Chew sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ek Peng Chew is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a focus on subfields including Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Automotive Engineering, Building and Construction, and Environmental Engineering.

The topics addressed in their scholarly work include Maritime Ports and Logistics, Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization, Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods, Urban and Freight Transport Logistics, Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency, and Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms.

Frequent publication venues for Chew's research include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IISE Transactions, and the European Journal of Operational Research.

Key recent publications encompass the following:

  • Analytics with digital-twinning: A decision support system for maintaining a resilient port, 2021, Decision Support Systems
  • Emerging technology and management research in the container terminals: Trends and the COVID-19 pandemic impacts, 2022, Ocean & Coastal Management
  • Integrated automated guided vehicle dispatching and equipment scheduling with speed optimization, 2022, Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
  • Performance Estimation and Design Optimization of a Congested Automated Container Terminal, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
  • Classification and literature review on the integration of simulation and optimization in maritime logistics studies, 2020, IISE Transactions

Chew collaborates frequently with a group of researchers including Loo Hay Lee, Haobin Li, Kok Choon Tan, and Chenhao Zhou.

Best Publications

  • Perfect decomposition techniques in energy and environmental analysis

    B.W. Ang;F.L. Liu;E.P. Chew

  • An optimization model for storage yard management in transshipment hubs

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan;Yongbin Han

  • An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs

    Lu Zhen;Ek Peng Chew;Loo Hay Lee

  • Travel time analysis for general item location assignment in a rectangular warehouse

    Ek Peng Chew;Loon Ching Tang

  • A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty

    Lu Zhen;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

  • Multi-objective simulation-based evolutionary algorithm for an aircraft spare parts allocation problem

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Suyan Teng;Yankai Chen

  • A yard storage strategy for minimizing traffic congestion in a marine container transshipment hub

    Yongbin Han;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan

  • Finding the non-dominated Pareto set for multi-objective simulation models

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Suyan Teng;David Goldsman

  • Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control

    Lu Zhen;Zhe Liang;Dan Zhuge;Loo Hay Lee

  • SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION OF HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS FOR HIGHWAYS

    E.P. Chew;C.J. Goh;T.F. Fwa

  • A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port

    Xinjia Jiang;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Yongbin Han

  • Joint inventory allocation and pricing decisions for perishable products

    Ek Peng Chew;Chulung Lee;Rujing Liu

  • Port connectivity study: An analysis framework from a global container liner shipping network perspective

    Jianlin Jiang;Jianlin Jiang;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Chee Chun Gan

  • The sample average approximation method for empty container repositioning with uncertainties

    Yin Long;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

  • Order picking systems: Batching and storage assignment strategies

    Loon C. Tang;Ek-Peng Chew

  • Analytics with digital-twinning: A decision support system for maintaining a resilient port

    Chenhao Zhou;Jie Xu;Elise Miller-Hooks;Weiwen Zhou

  • MicroPort: A general simulation platform for seaport container terminals

    Zhuo Sun;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan

  • Optimal computing budget allocation for multi-objective simulation models

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Suyan Teng;David Goldsman

  • Discrete and continuous models for computation of optimal vertical highway alignment

    C.J. Goh;E.P. Chew;T.F. Fwa

  • Mean residual life of lifetime distributions

    L.C. Tang;Y. Lu;E.P. Chew

  • Container Transshipment and Port Competition

    Min Ju Bae;Ek Peng Chew;Loo Hay Lee;Anming Zhang

  • A Simulation Budget Allocation Procedure for Enhancing the Efficiency of Optimal Subset Selection

    Si Zhang;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Jie Xu

  • Vehicle dispatching algorithms for container transshipment hubs

    Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew;Kok Choon Tan;Yuan Wang

  • Optimal Computing Budget Allocation for Particle Swarm Optimization in Stochastic Optimization

    Si Zhang;Jie Xu;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

  • Integrated automated guided vehicle dispatching and equipment scheduling with speed optimization

    Unknown

  • Enhancement of supply chain resilience through inter-echelon information sharing

    Haobin Li;Giulia Pedrielli;Loo Hay Lee;Ek Peng Chew

Frequent Co-Authors

Loo Hay Lee
Loo Hay Lee National University of Singapore
Chun-Hung Chen
Chun-Hung Chen George Mason University
Lu Zhen
Lu Zhen Shanghai University
Kap Hwan Kim
Kap Hwan Kim Pusan National University
Loon Ching Tang
Loon Ching Tang National University of Singapore
Tien Fang Fwa
Tien Fang Fwa National University of Singapore
Christine A. Shoemaker
Christine A. Shoemaker National University of Singapore
Ellis L. Johnson
Ellis L. Johnson Georgia Institute of Technology
B.W. Ang
B.W. Ang National University of Singapore
David Goldsman
David Goldsman Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics opens multiple pathways, including advanced studies and various career options. For those interested in business applications, exploring an MBA is a popular choice. If you’re considering further education, it’s important to understand how can you transfer mba programs credits effectively to optimize time and investment.

Another growing field is data analytics, where a master in data analytics can leverage your mathematical skills for careers in business intelligence, finance, and technology. This degree blends math with real-world data problem-solving, in high demand across industries.

If you prefer a quicker, more accessible route to bolster your qualifications, there are options like the easiest mba program that prioritize streamlined admission and flexible course structures. Such programs cater to professionals balancing work and study.

Furthermore, exploring the easiest mba programs online can provide convenient alternatives that minimize geographical constraints while opening doors to leadership roles informed by strong analytical foundations.

Best Scientists Citing Ek Peng Chew

Trending Scientists