World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick S. Kamath

Patrick S. Kamath

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
55096
World Ranking
6402
National Ranking
3410

Patrick S. Kamath publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick S. Kamath sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 595 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patrick S. Kamath D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick S. Kamath sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick S. Kamath is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has a substantial publication record primarily focused on Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Hepatology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Epidemiology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Pharmacology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Hepatitis C virus research
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease

Kamath's recent notable publications feature studies on liver disease and related clinical assessments. These include:

  • Global burden of liver disease: 2023 update (2023) in Journal of Hepatology
  • MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era (2021) in Gastroenterology
  • Inverse Association of Telomere Length With Liver Disease and Mortality in the US Population (2021) in Hepatology Communications
  • Population screening for liver fibrosis: Toward early diagnosis and intervention for chronic liver diseases (2021) in Hepatology
  • Comparison of mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19 compared with patients with cirrhosis alone and COVID-19 alone: multicentre matched cohort (2020) in Gut

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kamath include:

  • Douglas A. Simonetto
  • Vijay H. Shah
  • Jasmohan S. Bajaj
  • K. Rajender Reddy
  • Florence Wong

Kamath's work has appeared frequently in several key publication venues, reflecting the focus and impact within the field of hepatology and gastroenterology:

  • Journal of Hepatology (50 publications)
  • Gastroenterology (33 publications)
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (22 publications)
  • Hepatology (19 publications)
  • Annals of Hepatology (14 publications)

The breadth of Kamath's research emphasizes both clinical and epidemiological aspects of liver diseases, including diagnostic models, disease burden, and outcomes related to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, transplantation, and the effects of alcohol and other hepatotoxic agents.

Best Publications

  • A model to predict survival in patients with end‐stage liver disease

    Patrick S. Kamath;Russell H. Wiesner;Michael Malinchoc;Walter Kremers

  • Burden of liver diseases in the world

    Sumeet K. Asrani;Harshad Devarbhavi;John Eaton;Patrick S. Kamath

  • Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers

    Russell Wiesner;Erick Edwards;Richard Freeman;Ann Harper

  • The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)

    Patrick S. Kamath;W. Ray Kim

  • Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list.

    W. Ray Kim;Scott W. Biggins;Walter K. Kremers;Russell H. Wiesner

  • MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocation

    Russell H. Wiesner;Sue V. McDiarmid;Patrick S. Kamath;Eric B. Edwards

  • Evidence-Based Incorporation of Serum Sodium Concentration Into MELD

    Scott W. Biggins;W. Ray Kim;Norah A. Terrault;Sammy Saab

  • Mesenteric venous thrombosis.

    Shaji Kumar;Michael G. Sarr;Patrick S. Kamath

  • Acute-on chronic liver failure

    Rajiv Jalan;Pere Gines;Jody C Olson;Rajeshwar P Mookerjee

  • ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcoholic Liver Disease

    Ashwani K. Singal;Ramon Bataller;Joseph Ahn;Patrick S. Kamath

  • MELD accurately predicts mortality in patients with alcoholic hepatitis

    Winston Dunn;Laith H. Jamil;Larry S. Brown;Russell H. Wiesner

  • The Budd–Chiari Syndrome

    K V Narayanan Menon;Vijay Shah;Patrick S Kamath

  • Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting versus paracentesis plus albumin for refractory ascites in cirrhosis

    Pere Ginès;Juan Uriz;Blas Calahorra;Guadalupe Garcia–Tsao

  • Risk factors for mortality after surgery in patients with cirrhosis.

    Swee H. Teh;David M. Nagorney;Susanna R. Stevens;Kenneth P. Offord

  • Drug‐induced autoimmune hepatitis: Clinical characteristics and prognosis

    Einar Björnsson;Jayant Talwalkar;Sombat Treeprasertsuk;Patrick S. Kamath

  • Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures.

    Todd Huntley Baron;Patrick S. Kamath;Robert D. McBane

  • Survival in infection-related acute-on-chronic liver failure is defined by extrahepatic organ failures

    Jasmohan S. Bajaj;Jacqueline G. O'Leary;K. Rajender Reddy;Florence Wong

  • Second infections independently increase mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: the North American consortium for the study of end-stage liver disease (NACSELD) experience.

    Jasmohan S. Bajaj;Jacqueline G. O'Leary;K. Rajender Reddy;Florence Wong

  • Standard Definitions and Common Data Elements for Clinical Trials in Patients With Alcoholic Hepatitis: Recommendation From the NIAAA Alcoholic Hepatitis Consortia

    David W. Crabb;Ramon Bataller;Naga P. Chalasani;Patrick S. Kamath

  • CLINICAL-LIVER, PANCREAS, AND BILIARY TRACT Risk Factors for Mortality After Surgery in Patients With Cirrhosis

    Swee H. Teh;David M. Nagorney;Susanna R. Stevens;Kenneth P. Offord

Frequent Co-Authors

Florence Wong
Florence Wong University of Toronto
Jasmohan S. Bajaj
Jasmohan S. Bajaj Virginia Commonwealth University
Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao Yale University
K. Rajender Reddy
K. Rajender Reddy University of Pennsylvania
Paul J. Thuluvath
Paul J. Thuluvath Mercy Medical Center
Naga Chalasani
Naga Chalasani Indiana University
W. Ray Kim
W. Ray Kim Stanford University
David W. Crabb
David W. Crabb Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible or alternative educational routes, there are several options to consider. Aspiring nurses can benefit from easiest nursing schools to get into, which often have higher acceptance rates and more accessible admission requirements. This is a great starting point for students looking to enter the healthcare field quickly.

Some nursing schools also eliminate testing barriers by offering nursing programs without teas, helping learners bypass standardized entrance exams. These programs can be ideal for those who excel in practical or coursework-based evaluations.

If patient care isn’t your path, administrative and technical fields like healthcare administration are in high demand. You can advance your career quickly with online healthcare administration degree programs, many of which allow for accelerated completion.

For those interested in the business side of healthcare, enrolling in specialized programs like medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid is an excellent choice. These online pathways provide flexibility and can lead to stable careers supporting the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick S. Kamath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles