World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
60
Citations
17602
World Ranking
550
National Ranking
282

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
60
Citations
17621
World Ranking
2136
National Ranking
677

Ellis L. Johnson publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellis L. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 157 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Ellis L. Johnson D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellis L. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to combinatorial optimization and its application to logistical problems.
  • 1988 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For fundamental contributions to discrete optimization and software design, and its practical applications to distribution and manufacturing systems.

Overview

Ellis L. Johnson was affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their work focused primarily on combinatorial optimization and discrete optimization, with applications in logistical problems as well as distribution and manufacturing systems.

The contributions made by Johnson were recognized through prestigious awards. In 2009, they were named a SIAM Fellow, specifically cited for contributions to combinatorial optimization and its application to logistical problems. Earlier, in 1988, Johnson became a member of the National Academy of Engineering for fundamental contributions to discrete optimization and software design, as well as practical applications in distribution and manufacturing.

During their career, Johnson published research relevant to these fields, though specific papers and publication venues are not detailed here. The absence of listed frequent co-authors or specific venues implies a focus on individual or collaborative work not extensively catalogued in the available data.

Johnson's research legacy is centered on discrete and combinatorial optimization methodologies, integrating theoretical advancements with applied computational techniques tailored to operational systems.

Best Publications

  • Branch-And-Price: Column Generation for Solving Huge Integer Programs

    Cynthia Barnhart;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser;Martin W. P. Savelsbergh

  • MATCHING, EULER TOURS AND THE CHINESE POSTMAN

    Jack R. Edmonds;Ellis L. Johnson

  • Solving Large-Scale Zero-One Linear Programming Problems

    Harlan Crowder;Ellis L. Johnson;Manfred Padberg

  • The fleet assignment problem: Solving a large-scale integer program

    Christopher A. Hane;Cynthia Barnhart;Ellis L. Johnson;Roy E. Marsten

  • Flight String Models for Aircraft Fleeting and Routing

    Cynthia Barnhart;Natashia L. Boland;Lloyd W. Clarke;Ellis L. Johnson

  • Matching: a well-solved class of integer linear programs

    Jack Edmonds;Ellis L. Johnson

  • Facet of regular 0–1 polytopes

    Peter L. Hammer;Ellis L. Johnson;Uri N. Peled

  • An Optimization Based Heuristic for Political Districting

    Anuj Mehrotra;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser

  • Airline Crew Scheduling

    Cynthia Barnhart;Amy M. Cohn;Ellis L. Johnson;Diego Klabjan

  • Solving binary cutting stock problems by column generation and branch-and-bound

    Pamela H. Vance;Cynthia Barnhart;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser

  • The aircraft rotation problem

    Lloyd W. Clarke;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser;Zhongxi Zhu

  • Min-cut clustering

    Ellis J. L. Johnson;Anuj Mehrotra;George L. Nemhauser

  • Progress in Linear Programming-Based Algorithms for Integer Programming: An Exposition

    Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser;Martin W.P. Savelsbergh

  • Airline Crew Scheduling: A New Formulation and Decomposition Algorithm

    Pamela H. Vance;Cynthia Barnhart;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser

  • Some continuous functions related to corner polyhedra, II

    Ralph E. Gomory;Ellis L. Johnson

  • Rerouting Aircraft for Airline Recovery

    Jay M. Rosenberger;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser

  • Airline crew scheduling : State-of-the-art

    Balaji Gopalakrishnan;Ellis. L. Johnson

  • Maintenance and Crew Considerations in Fleet Assignment

    Lloyd W. Clarke;Christopher A. Hane;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser

  • Airline Crew Scheduling Under Uncertainty

    Andrew J. Schaefer;Ellis L. Johnson;Anton J. Kleywegt;George L. Nemhauser

  • Airline Crew Recovery

    Ladislav Lettovský;Ellis L. Johnson;George L. Nemhauser

Frequent Co-Authors

George L. Nemhauser
George L. Nemhauser Georgia Institute of Technology
John-Paul Clarke
John-Paul Clarke The University of Texas at Austin
Diego Klabjan
Diego Klabjan Northwestern University
Andrew J. Schaefer
Andrew J. Schaefer Rice University
Martin W. P. Savelsbergh
Martin W. P. Savelsbergh Georgia Institute of Technology
David Goldsman
David Goldsman Georgia Institute of Technology
Manfred Padberg
Manfred Padberg New York University
Natashia Boland
Natashia Boland Georgia Institute of Technology
William Singhose
William Singhose Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, online degrees offer flexible and diverse pathways to enhance career prospects. Many turn to programs like the best 1 year mba programs to quickly gain business acumen alongside their technical skills. This integration prepares graduates for leadership roles in analytics-driven industries.

Additionally, understanding credit transfer policies is vital for those who wish to leverage prior academic work. Exploring options such as transfer credits for online mba programs can save time and reduce costs, making advanced degrees more accessible.

Students interested specifically in data-driven fields often consider a master in data analytics. This program equips mathematicians with practical skills in data interpretation, a rapidly growing area with strong job demand.

For those balancing education with other commitments, programs labeled as the easiest mba programs to get into might provide an accessible entry point to graduate education without compromising quality.

Best Scientists Citing Ellis L. Johnson

Recently Published Articles