World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lawrence M. Leemis

Lawrence M. Leemis

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
4368
World Ranking
3193
National Ranking
1275

Lawrence M. Leemis publications per year

1984: 1 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1984 2025

178 publications in total across all disciplines

Lawrence M. Leemis publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Leemis sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 139 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Lawrence M. Leemis D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Leemis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Reliability: Probabilistic Models and Statistical Methods

    Lawrence M. Leemis

  • A COMPARISON OF APPROXIMATE INTERVAL ESTIMATORS FOR THE BERNOULLI PARAMETER

    Lawrence Leemis;Kishor S. Trivedi

  • Univariate Distribution Relationships

    Lawrence M Leemis;Jacquelyn T McQueston

  • Discrete-Event Simulation: A First Course

    Lawrence M. Leemis;Stephen K. Park

  • Computing the distribution of the product of two continuous random variables

    Andrew G. Glen;Lawrence M. Leemis;John H. Drew

  • Survival Distributions Satisfying Benford's Law

    Lawrence M. Leemis;Bruce W. Schmeiser;Diane L. Evans

  • Nonparametric estimation of the Cumulative intensity function for a nonhomogeneous Poisson process

    Lawrence M. Leemis

  • Computing the cumulative distribution function of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic

    John H. Drew;Andrew G. Glen;Lawrence M. Leemis

  • Nonparametric Estimation of the Cumulative Intensity Function for a Nonhomogeneous Poisson Process from Overlapping Realizations

    Bradford L. Arkin;Lawrence M. Leemis

  • Burn-In Models and Methods: A Review

    Lawrence M. Leemis;Margarita Beneke

  • Minimum Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistic parameter estimates

    Michael D. Weber;Lawrence M. Leemis;Rex K. Kincaid

  • The Distribution of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramer–von Mises, and Anderson–Darling Test Statistics for Exponential Populations with Estimated Parameters

    Diane L. Evans;John H. Drew;Lawrence M. Leemis

  • APPL: A Probability Programming Language

    Andrew G. Glen;Diane L. Evans;Lawrence M. Leemis

  • Order statistics in goodness-of-fit testing

    A.G. Glen;L.M. Leemis;D.R. Barr

  • Nonparametric estimation and variate generation for a nonhomogeneous Poisson process from event count data

    Lawrence M. Leemis

  • Variate generation for accelerated life and proportional hazards models with time dependent covariates

    Lawrence M. Leemis;Li Hsing Shih;Kurt Reynertson

  • Lifetime Distribution Identities

    Lawrence M. Leemis

  • Relationships among Common Univariate Distributions

    Lawrence M. Leemis

  • The Logistic-Exponential Survival Distribution

    Yingjie Lan;Lawrence M. Leemis

  • Applied Linear Regression Models

    Lawrence Leemis

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell R. Barton
Russell R. Barton Pennsylvania State University
Shane G. Henderson
Shane G. Henderson Cornell University
Lee W. Schruben
Lee W. Schruben University of California, Berkeley
Barry L. Nelson
Barry L. Nelson Northwestern University
David M. Nicol
David M. Nicol University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David Goldsman
David Goldsman Georgia Institute of Technology
Gianfranco Ciardo
Gianfranco Ciardo Iowa State University
Kishor S. Trivedi
Kishor S. Trivedi Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, there are several valuable online degrees that complement this field. Many consider an MBA to enhance their business and leadership skills. If you are curious about flexibility in your studies, you might want to explore programs that allow you to can you transfer mba programs to continue your education without losing credits.

Data analytics is another promising pathway closely tied to Mathematics. A masters in data analytics is an excellent option for those looking to specialize in interpreting and applying complex data, which can significantly boost career prospects in tech and finance sectors.

When considering an MBA, some students prioritize ease of admission. Resources listing the easiest mba program to get into can help identify schools with more accessible entry requirements. This approach can allow quicker progression into business roles.

Additionally, if you want a more flexible schedule or are balancing work and study, exploring easy online mba programs can be a practical choice. These programs are designed for convenience without compromising essential business knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence M. Leemis

Recently Published Articles