World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
35
Citations
7203
World Ranking
8893
National Ranking
2474

Lee W. Schruben publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee W. Schruben sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Lee W. Schruben D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee W. Schruben sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Lee W. Schruben is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. They have contributed to the academic community primarily through research in operations research and management sciences.

In recognition of their contributions, Schruben was named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2003.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications have been listed. Likewise, detailed information on their main fields or subfields of study, as well as main topics of work, is not provided in the available data.

The information available indicates a focus on operations research and management sciences through their fellowship with INFORMS, which is a professional society dedicated to these fields.

Best Publications

  • A Guide to Simulation.

    Lee W. Schruben;Paul Bratley;Bennett L. Fox;Linus E. Schrage

  • Simulation modeling with event graphs

    Lee Schruben

  • Confidence Interval Estimation Using Standardized Time Series

    Lee Schruben

  • Detecting Initialization Bias in Simulation Output

    Lee W. Schruben

  • A survey of simulation optimization techniques and procedures

    J.R. Swisher;P.D. Hyden;S.H. Jacobson;L.W. Schruben

  • Pseudorandom Number Assignment in Statistically Designed Simulation and Distribution Sampling Experiments

    Lee W. Schruben;Barry H. Margolin

  • Optimal Tests for Initialization Bias in Simulation Output

    L. Schruben;H. Singh;L. Tierney

  • Establishing the credibility of simulations

    Lee W. Schruben

  • Techniques for simulation response optimization

    Sheldon H Jacobson;Lee W Schruben

  • An experimental procedure for simulation response surface model identification

    Lee W. Schruben;V. James Cogliano

  • Properties of standardized time series weighted area variance estimators

    David Goldsman;Marc Meketon;Lee Schruben

  • Simulation optimization: a survey of simulation optimization techniques and procedures

    James R. Swisher;Paul D. Hyden;Sheldon H. Jacobson;Lee W. Schruben

  • Resampling methods for input modeling

    Russell R. Barton;Lee W. Schruben

  • Uniform and bootstrap resampling of empirical distributions

    Russell R. Barton;Lee W. Schruben

  • DESIGNING CORRELATION INDUCTION STRATEGIES FOR SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS

    Lee W. Schruben

  • Retrospective simulation response optimization

    Kevin Healy;Lee W. Schruben

  • Note-New Confidence Interval Estimators Using Standardized Time Series

    David Goldsman;Lee Schruben

  • A survey of recent advances in discrete input parameter discrete-event simulation optimization

    James R. Swisher;Paul D. Hyden;Sheldon Howard Jacobson;Lee W. Schruben

  • On the Generality of Event-Graph Models

    Eric L. Savage;Lee W. Schruben;Enver Yücesan

  • Asymptotic Properties of Some Confidence Interval Estimators for Simulation Output

    David Goldsman;Lee Schruben

  • Simulation modeling for analysis

    Lee Schruben

  • Proceedings of the 1989 winter simulation conference

    P. Heidelberger;Lee Schruben;Enver Yucesan;Fontainebleau Cedex

  • MODELING FOR ANALYSIS

    Lee Schruben

Frequent Co-Authors

David Goldsman
David Goldsman Georgia Institute of Technology
Russell R. Barton
Russell R. Barton Pennsylvania State University
Sheldon H. Jacobson
Sheldon H. Jacobson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Shane G. Henderson
Shane G. Henderson Cornell University
Barry L. Nelson
Barry L. Nelson Northwestern University
Lawrence M. Leemis
Lawrence M. Leemis William & Mary
David Zhang
David Zhang Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Pascal A. Oltenacu
Pascal A. Oltenacu University of Florida
Hollis N. Erb
Hollis N. Erb Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology fields are evolving fast, creating demand for leaders who can manage both technical teams and complex projects. Pursuing an organizational management degree online is a strategic move for those looking to step into leadership roles within the tech industry. These degrees help graduates understand how to guide teams and drive innovation.

Aspiring managers should also consider advanced business credentials. Many professionals today look for the best online mba in operations management programs to expand their skills in process optimization and supply chain management. Flexible formats now allow students to pursue an best online mba no gmat, removing barriers for experienced applicants.

Cost is a key consideration when selecting a degree. Fortunately, students can now find an mba under 30k that delivers high-quality business training without the heavy financial burden.

Whether you aim for project management, operations, or executive leadership, these related online degrees support a wide range of career pathways in engineering and technology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Lee W. Schruben

Trending Scientists