D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 31 Citations 4,310 96 World Ranking 4641 National Ranking 2394

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Social psychology
  • Statistics

His primary scientific interests are in Social psychology, Task, Microeconomics, Negotiation and Social exchange theory. His study in Social psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Developmental psychology and Test. His research ties Extension and Microeconomics together.

His work deals with themes such as Structuralism and Mathematical economics, which intersect with Dynamic network analysis. His Structuralism research includes themes of Artificial intelligence and Social network. His Mathematical economics research includes elements of Structure and Group.

His most cited work include:

  • Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. (1722 citations)
  • The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. (311 citations)
  • EXCLUSION AND POWER: A TEST OF FOUR THEORIES OF POWER IN EXCHANGE NETWORKS* (177 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

John Skvoretz mainly focuses on Social psychology, Social network, Structure, Mathematical economics and Social network analysis. His study ties his expertise on Outcome together with the subject of Social psychology. His Social network analysis study in the realm of Social network connects with subjects such as Position and Perspective.

His study on Structure also encompasses disciplines like

  • Cognitive science, Artificial intelligence, Generative grammar, Rule-based machine translation and Cybernetics most often made with reference to Action,
  • Variety that connect with fields like Self-interest and Positive economics. As a member of one scientific family, John Skvoretz mostly works in the field of Mathematical economics, focusing on Social exchange theory and, on occasion, Negotiation and Microeconomics. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Data science, Public relations and Citation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (28.70%)
  • Social network (15.74%)
  • Structure (12.96%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Social network analysis (11.11%)
  • Empirical research (5.56%)
  • Competence (3.70%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Social network analysis, Empirical research, Competence, Social psychology and Social network. His research in Competence intersects with topics in Attribution, Team composition, Homophily and Team effectiveness. The study incorporates disciplines such as Test, Variation and Applied psychology in addition to Homophily.

His work blends Social psychology and Health care studies together. His Social network study combines topics in areas such as Data science, Framing, Framing and Public relations. His study on Opinion leadership is often connected to Science education, Educational technology and Diversity as part of broader study in Public relations.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The power of indirect ties (11 citations)
  • Investigating how faculty social networks and peer influence relate to knowledge and use of evidence-based teaching practices (7 citations)
  • The Social‐psychological Aspects of Team Formation: New Avenues for Research (7 citations)

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths.

Tore Opsahl;Filip Agneessens;John Skvoretz.
Social Networks (2010)

2682 Citations

The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model.

Michael W. Macy;John Skvoretz.
American Sociological Review (1998)

561 Citations

EXCLUSION AND POWER: A TEST OF FOUR THEORIES OF POWER IN EXCHANGE NETWORKS*

John Skvoretz;David Willer.
American Sociological Review (1993)

252 Citations

The Seeds of Weak Power: An Extension of Network Exchange Theory

Barry Markovsky;John Skvoretz;David Willer;Michael Lovaglia.
American Sociological Review (1993)

230 Citations

Comparing Networks Across Space and Time, Size and Species

Katherine Faust;John Skvoretz.
Sociological Methodology (2002)

224 Citations

Status and Participation in Task Groups: A Dynamic Network Model

John Skvoretz;Thomas J. Fararo.
American Journal of Sociology (1996)

173 Citations

Measuring Patterns of Acquaintanceship [and Comments and Reply]

Peter D. Killworth;H. Russell Bernard;Christopher McCarty;Patrick Doreian.
Current Anthropology (1984)

167 Citations

Artificial Social Intelligence

William Simms Bainbridge;Edward E. Brent;Kathleen M. Carley;David R. Heise.
Review of Sociology (1994)

145 Citations

Logit Models for Affiliation Networks

John Skvoretz;Katherine Faust.
Sociological Methodology (1999)

141 Citations

Institutions as production systems

Thomas J. Fararo;John Skvoretz.
Journal of Mathematical Sociology (1984)

121 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing John Skvoretz

Yong Deng

Yong Deng

Southwest University

Publications: 40

Denny Borsboom

Denny Borsboom

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 36

Eiko I. Fried

Eiko I. Fried

Leiden University

Publications: 24

Jim van Os

Jim van Os

University Medical Center Utrecht

Publications: 19

Kathleen M. Carley

Kathleen M. Carley

Carnegie Mellon University

Publications: 17

Edward J. Lawler

Edward J. Lawler

Cornell University

Publications: 16

Adriana Iamnitchi

Adriana Iamnitchi

Maastricht University

Publications: 16

Garry Robins

Garry Robins

University of Melbourne

Publications: 15

Carter T. Butts

Carter T. Butts

University of California, Irvine

Publications: 14

Robin I. M. Dunbar

Robin I. M. Dunbar

University of Oxford

Publications: 14

David R. Heise

David R. Heise

Indiana University

Publications: 13

Philippa Pattison

Philippa Pattison

University of Sydney

Publications: 12

Stephen P. Borgatti

Stephen P. Borgatti

University of Kentucky

Publications: 12

Michael W. Macy

Michael W. Macy

Cornell University

Publications: 11

Cecilia L. Ridgeway

Cecilia L. Ridgeway

Stanford University

Publications: 11

Lynn Smith-Lovin

Lynn Smith-Lovin

Duke University

Publications: 11

Trending Scientists

Pádraig Cunningham

Pádraig Cunningham

University College Dublin

Congjie Gao

Congjie Gao

Zhejiang University of Technology

Zhenmeng Peng

Zhenmeng Peng

University of Akron

Stephen G. Davies

Stephen G. Davies

University of Oxford

Jennifer A. Hollingsworth

Jennifer A. Hollingsworth

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Rebecca Vega Thurber

Rebecca Vega Thurber

Oregon State University

R. Scott Poethig

R. Scott Poethig

University of Pennsylvania

Delphine Lannuzel

Delphine Lannuzel

University of Tasmania

Lorenz M. Hilty

Lorenz M. Hilty

University of Zurich

Josef Hejzlar

Josef Hejzlar

Czech Academy of Sciences

Pamela M. Cole

Pamela M. Cole

Pennsylvania State University

Gilles Chatellier

Gilles Chatellier

Université Paris Cité

Marc Arbyn

Marc Arbyn

Ghent University

Peter M. Rothwell

Peter M. Rothwell

University of Oxford

Fabrizio Gilardi

Fabrizio Gilardi

University of Zurich

Something went wrong. Please try again later.