World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
59
Citations
21585
World Ranking
169
National Ranking
1

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
27621
World Ranking
2769
National Ranking
144

Eiko I. Fried publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eiko I. Fried sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Eiko I. Fried D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eiko I. Fried sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Eiko I. Fried is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research contributions span psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, biological psychiatry, and psychiatry and mental health. Their work addresses a variety of topics related to mental health research, including functional brain connectivity studies, tryptophan and brain disorders, schizophrenia research and treatment, complex network analysis techniques, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Fried has published extensively, with recent papers including:

  • Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science, 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them, 2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data, 2022, Psychological Methods
  • Lack of Theory Building and Testing Impedes Progress in The Factor and Network Literature, 2020, Psychological Inquiry
  • Revisiting the theoretical and methodological foundations of depression measurement, 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology

The most frequent co-authors collaborating with Fried are:

  • Sacha Epskamp
  • Donald J. Robinaugh
  • Denny Borsboom
  • Adela-Maria Isvoranu
  • Lourens Waldorp

Frequent publication venues for Fried include:

  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy

The body of Fried's work is characterized by contributions to mental health research topics and methodological advances in psychological science, particularly through network analysis approaches applied to psychological data.

Best Publications

  • Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy : A tutorial paper

    Sacha Epskamp;Denny Borsboom;Eiko I. Fried

  • A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks.

    Sacha Epskamp;Eiko I. Fried

  • Depression is not a consistent syndrome: An investigation of unique symptom patterns in the STAR*D study

    Eiko I. Fried;Randolph M. Nesse

  • Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights

    Eiko I Fried;Claudia D van Borkulo;Angélique O J Cramer;Lynn Boschloo

  • Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science

    Denny Borsboom;Marie K. Deserno;Mijke Rhemtulla;Sacha Epskamp

  • Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential

    Eiko I Fried;Randolph M Nesse

  • Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology:

    Eiko I Fried;Angélique O J Cramer

  • Network analysis of depression and anxiety symptom relationships in a psychiatric sample.

    Courtney Beard;Alex J. Millner;Marie J. C. Forgeard;Eiko I. Fried

  • Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them:

    Jessica Kay Flake;Eiko I. Fried

  • What are 'good' depression symptoms? Comparing the centrality of DSM and non-DSM symptoms of depression in a network analysis

    Eiko I. Fried;Sacha Epskamp;Randolph M. Nesse;Francis Tuerlinckx

  • The 52 symptoms of major depression: Lack of content overlap among seven common depression scales.

    Eiko I. Fried

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • The impact of individual depressive symptoms on impairment of psychosocial functioning.

    Eiko I. Fried;Randolph M. Nesse

  • Problematic assumptions have slowed down depression research: why symptoms, not syndromes are the way forward

    Eiko I. Fried

  • Replicability and Generalizability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Networks: A Cross-Cultural Multisite Study of PTSD Symptoms in Four Trauma Patient Samples

    Eiko I Fried;Marloes B Eidhof;Sabina Palic;Giulio Costantini

  • How predictable are symptoms in psychopathological networks? A reanalysis of 18 published datasets

    Jonas Haslbeck;Eiko I. Fried

  • From loss to loneliness: The relationship between bereavement and depressive symptoms.

    Eiko I. Fried;Claudi Bockting;Retha Arjadi;Denny Borsboom

  • A network analysis of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and correlates in U.S. military veterans

    Cherie Armour;Eiko I. Fried;Marie K. Deserno;Jack Tsai

  • Social media and depression symptoms: A network perspective.

    George Aalbers;Richard J. McNally;Alexandre Heeren;Sanne de Wit

  • Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors

    Eiko I. Fried;Randolph M. Nesse;Kara Zivin;Constance Guille

Frequent Co-Authors

Denny Borsboom
Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam
Donald J. Robinaugh
Donald J. Robinaugh Massachusetts General Hospital
Randolph M. Nesse
Randolph M. Nesse Arizona State University
Jan Stochl
Jan Stochl University of Cambridge
Robert A. Schoevers
Robert A. Schoevers University Medical Center Groningen
Rogier A. Kievit
Rogier A. Kievit Donders Institute
Angélique O. J. Cramer
Angélique O. J. Cramer University of Amsterdam
Ian M. Goodyer
Ian M. Goodyer University of Cambridge
Giovanni Abrahão Salum
Giovanni Abrahão Salum Child Mind Institute
Lorne Campbell
Lorne Campbell University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees online offers a wealth of flexible career options for those passionate about understanding human behavior. Many students pursue counseling psychology careers, which focus on helping individuals cope with life’s challenges. These roles can take place in schools, mental health clinics, or private practice.

It's important to note the differences between therapy vs counseling when considering your academic path. While both fields aim to support mental well-being, their scopes and training requirements can differ significantly. Understanding these distinctions can help you choose the most suitable online program for your interests and career goals.

Looking for job security? The fastest growing jobs in psychology include specialized counseling, organizational psychology, and wellness-focused roles. Digital learning platforms now make it easier to attain the necessary credentials and certifications for these careers.

If you’re drawn to the intersection of law and psychology, consider the rewarding prospects in forensic psychology salary. This rapidly expanding field merges criminal justice and mental health expertise, offering unique opportunities for professionals with degrees earned online or on campus.

Best Scientists Citing Eiko I. Fried

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles