World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
98
Citations
29598
World Ranking
685
National Ranking
89

Ian M. Goodyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Goodyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 382 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ian M. Goodyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Goodyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Ian M. Goodyer is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields including neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work concentrates on functional brain connectivity studies, mental health research, schizophrenia research and treatment, and advanced neuroimaging techniques. Other main topics include neural dynamics and brain function, stress responses and cortisol, and bipolar disorder and treatment.

Recent publications by Ian M. Goodyer cover a range of subjects related to adolescent brain development and mental health. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Conservative and disruptive modes of adolescent change in human brain functional connectivity," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Influence of prior beliefs on perception in early psychosis: Effects of illness stage and hierarchical level of belief," 2020, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • "Childhood socio-economic disadvantage predicts reduced myelin growth across adolescence and young adulthood," 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • "Sexually divergent development of depression-related brain networks during healthy human adolescence," 2022, Science Advances
  • "Behavioral measures of impulsivity and compulsivity in adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury," 2021, CNS Spectrums

Ian M. Goodyer frequently collaborates with several researchers. Frequent coauthors include Peter B. Jones, Peter Fonagy, Raymond J. Dolan, Edward T. Bullmore, and Rafael Romero-García.

The scientist's work is published in diverse venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

Ian M. Goodyer has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Clinical and Psychosocial Predictors of Suicide Attempts and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in the Adolescent Depression Antidepressants and Psychotherapy Trial (ADAPT)

    Paul Wilkinson;Raphael Kelvin;Chris Roberts;Bernadka Dubicka

  • Recent life events, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone and the onset of major depression in high-risk adolescents.

    Ian M. Goodyer;J. Herbert;A. Tamplin;P. M. E. Altham

  • Adolescence is associated with genomically patterned consolidation of the hubs of the human brain connectome

    Kirstie J. Whitaker;Petra E. Vértes;Rafael Romero-Garcia;František Váša

  • Maternal postnatal depression and the development of depression in offspring up to 16 years of age

    Lynne Murray;Adriane Arteche;Pasco Fearon;Sarah L Halligan

  • Do corticosteroids damage the brain

    J. Herbert;I. M. Goodyer;A. B. Grossman;M. H. Hastings

  • Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications

    Rogier Andrew Kievit;Andreas M Brandmaier;Gabriel Ziegler;Anne-Laura van Harmelen

  • Morphometric Similarity Networks Detect Microscale Cortical Organization and Predict Inter-Individual Cognitive Variation

    Jakob Seidlitz;Jakob Seidlitz;František Váša;Maxwell Shinn;Rafael Romero-Garcia

  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and routine specialist care with and without cognitive behaviour therapy in adolescents with major depression: randomised controlled trial

    Ian Goodyer;Bernadka Dubicka;Paul Wilkinson;Raphael Kelvin

  • Exposure to postnatal depression predicts elevated cortisol in adolescent offspring

    Sarah L Halligan;Joe Herbert;Ian M Goodyer;Lynne Murray

  • The Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ): A Unidimensional Item Response Theory and Categorical Data Factor Analysis of Self-Report Ratings from a Community Sample of 7-through 11-Year-Old Children

    Carla Sharp;Ian M. Goodyer;Tim J. Croudace

  • Longitudinal investigation into childhood- and adolescence-onset depression: psychiatric outcome in early adulthood.

    Valerie Dunn;Ian M Goodyer

  • Adrenal secretion during major depression in 8- to 16-year-olds, I. Altered diurnal rhythms in salivary cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) at presentation.

    I. M. Goodyer;J. Herbert;P. M. E. Altham;J. Pearson

  • A genomewide scan identifies two novel loci involved in specific language impairment

    D. F. Newbury;J. D. Cleak;Y. Ishikawa-Brush;A. J. Marlow

  • Adolescent Tuning of Association Cortex in Human Structural Brain Networks.

    František Váša;Jakob Seidlitz;Jakob Seidlitz;Rafael Romero-Garcia;Kirstie J Whitaker;Kirstie J Whitaker

  • Shift toward prior knowledge confers a perceptual advantage in early psychosis and psychosis-prone healthy individuals

    Christoph Teufel;Christoph Teufel;Naresh Subramaniam;Veronika Dobler;Veronika Dobler;Jesus Perez;Jesus Perez

  • Deficits in facial expression recognition in male adolescents with early-onset or adolescence-onset conduct disorder

    Graeme Fairchild;Stephanie Helena Maria Van Goozen;Andrew J. Calder;Sarah J. Stollery

  • Methylphenidate improves working memory and set-shifting in AD/HD: relationships to baseline memory capacity.

    Mitul A. Mehta;Mitul A. Mehta;Ian M. Goodyer;Barbara J. Sahakian

  • Brain structure abnormalities in early-onset and adolescent-onset conduct disorder

    Graeme Fairchild;Luca Passamonti;Georgina Hurford;Cindy C.. Hagan

  • Salivary cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone in relation to puberty and gender

    Clare Netherton;Ian Goodyer;Alison Tamplin;Joe Herbert

  • Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort

    Anne-Laura van Harmelen;Rogier Andrew Kievit;K Ioannidis;Sharon Ann Neufeld

  • Cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and DHEA sulfate in the cerebrospinal fluid of man: relation to blood levels and the effects of age.

    E P Guazzo;P J Kirkpatrick;I M Goodyer;H M Shiers

  • Research review: evaluating and reformulating the developmental taxonomic theory of antisocial behaviour

    Graeme Fairchild;Stephanie Helena Maria Van Goozen;Andrew J. Calder;Ian M. Goodyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Jones
Peter Jones University of Cambridge
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Peter Fonagy
Peter Fonagy University College London
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Petra E. Vértes
Petra E. Vértes University of Cambridge
Joe Herbert
Joe Herbert University of Cambridge
Anne-Laura van Harmelen
Anne-Laura van Harmelen University of Cambridge
Jakob Seidlitz
Jakob Seidlitz University of Pennsylvania
John Suckling
John Suckling University of Cambridge
Graeme Fairchild
Graeme Fairchild University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in studying Psychology in the USA often explore related fields such as Social Work, which offers diverse and rewarding career paths. Online social work programs are growing in popularity, providing flexible and affordable options for those seeking to make a difference in their communities.

When searching for programs, affordability is a key concern for many prospective students. The most affordable social work degree programs in Nevada are a great option for those in the western United States. If you are located in the Midwest, consider the cheapest social work degrees in Ohio for budget-friendly choices.

For those interested in studying in the Northeast, the cheapest social work programs in Pennsylvania offer quality education at lower costs. Meanwhile, individuals based in the Pacific Northwest can review the most affordable social work degree programs in Portland.

Ultimately, pursuing online degrees in related fields like Social Work can open doors to fulfilling roles in mental health support, counseling, case management, and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Ian M. Goodyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles