World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
19056
World Ranking
3189
National Ranking
33

Michael Kaess publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Kaess sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 607 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Kaess D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Kaess sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Kaess is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland and is active in research related to psychology and medicine. Their work primarily spans the fields of clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, suicide and self-harm studies, personality disorders and psychopathology, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, schizophrenia research and treatment, functional brain connectivity studies, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Michael Kaess has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • Advancing a temporal framework for understanding the biology of nonsuicidal self-injury: An expert review, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020), 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Self-harm in the context of borderline personality disorder, 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Non-suicidal self-injury disorder as a stand-alone diagnosis in a consecutive help-seeking sample of adolescents, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

Frequent co-authors who collaborate with Michael Kaess include Julian Koenig, Franz Resch, Marialuisa Cavelti, Stefan Lerch, and Corinna Reichl.

The venues where Michael Kaess most frequently publishes are:

  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Psychopathology
  • Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

In addition to journal articles, Michael Kaess has published books through Hogrefe Verlag, including Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung and Ratgeber Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung, both published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Physical activity in European adolescents and associations with anxiety, depression and well-being

    Elaine M. McMahon;Paul Corcoran;Grace O’Regan;Helen Keeley

  • The Association between Pathological Internet Use and Comorbid Psychopathology: A Systematic Review.

    V. Carli;T. Durkee;Danuta Wasserman;G. Hadlaczky

  • School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial

    Danuta Wasserman;Christina W. Hoven;Camilla Wasserman;Camilla Wasserman;Melanie Wall

  • Adolescent subthreshold-depression and anxiety: psychopathology, functional impairment and increased suicide risk

    Judit Balázs;Mónika Miklósi;Ágnes Keresztény;Christina W. Hoven

  • Associations between depression and specific childhood experiences of abuse and neglect: a meta-analysis

    Maria Rita Infurna;Corinna Reichl;Peter Parzer;Adriano Schimmenti

  • Prevalence of pathological internet use among adolescents in Europe: demographic and social factors

    Tony Durkee;Michael Kaess;Vladimir Carli;Peter Parzer

  • Life-time prevalence and psychosocial correlates of adolescent direct self-injurious behavior: a comparative study of findings in 11 European countries.

    Romuald Brunner;Michael Kaess;Peter Parzer;Gloria Fischer

  • Adverse childhood experiences and their impact on frequency, severity, and the individual function of nonsuicidal self-injury in youth

    Michael Kaess;Peter Parzer;Margarete Mattern;Paul L. Plener

  • Borderline Personality Disorder in Adolescence

    Michael Kaess;Romuald Brunner;Andrew M. Chanen

  • Pathological Internet use among European adolescents: psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours

    Michael Kaess;Tony Durkee;Romuald Brunner;Vladimir Carli

  • Developmental pathways to borderline personality disorder.

    Andrew M. Chanen;Michael Kaess;Michael Kaess

  • International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020).

    Adam D. Farmer;Adam Strzelczyk;Alessandra Finisguerra;Alexander V. Gourine

  • Depression and resting state heart rate variability in children and adolescents - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Julian Koenig;Andrew H. Kemp;Andrew H. Kemp;Theodore P. Beauchaine;Julian F. Thayer

  • Hours of sleep in adolescents and its association with anxiety, emotional concerns, and suicidal ideation

    Marco Sarchiapone;Laura Mandelli;Laura Mandelli;Laura Mandelli;Vladimir Carli;Miriam Iosue

  • Bullying Victimization and Suicide Ideation and Behavior Among Adolescents in Europe: A 10-Country Study

    Shira Barzilay;Shira Barzilay;Anat Brunstein Klomek;Anat Brunstein Klomek;Alan Apter;Vladimir Carli

  • A newly identified group of adolescents at “invisible” risk for psychopathology and suicidal behavior: findings from the SEYLE study

    Vladimir Carli;Christina W Hoven;Camilla Wasserman;Camilla Wasserman;Flaminia Chiesa

  • Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe (SEYLE): a randomized controlled trial

    Danuta Wasserman;Vladimir Carli;Vladimir Carli;Camilla Wasserman;Alan Apter

  • Alterations in the neuroendocrinological stress response to acute psychosocial stress in adolescents engaging in nonsuicidal self-injury

    Michael Kaess;Markus Hille;Peter Parzer;Christiane Maser-Gluth

  • ESCAP Expert Article: Borderline personality disorder in adolescence: An expert research review with implications for clinical practice

    Peter Fonagy;Mario Speranza;Patrick Luyten;Patrick Luyten;Michael Kaess

  • The German version of the self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview (SITBI-G): a tool to assess non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior disorder

    Gloria Fischer;Nina Ameis;Peter Parzer;Paul L Plener

  • Pathological Internet Use and Risk-Behaviors among European Adolescents

    Tony Durkee;Vladimir Carli;Birgitta Floderus;Camilla Wasserman;Camilla Wasserman

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz Resch
Franz Resch Heidelberg University
Peter Parzer
Peter Parzer University Hospital Heidelberg
Romuald Brunner
Romuald Brunner Heidelberg University
Marco Sarchiapone
Marco Sarchiapone University of Molise
Danuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman Karolinska Institute
Christina W. Hoven
Christina W. Hoven Columbia University
Alan Apter
Alan Apter Reichman University
Julio Bobes
Julio Bobes University of Oviedo
Airi Värnik
Airi Värnik Tallinn University
Paul L. Plener
Paul L. Plener Medical University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens a wide range of career options for students in the USA. Many universities now offer accredited online programs that provide flexibility and quality education, helping students balance work and studies. These programs prepare graduates for diverse fields such as counseling, human resources, research, mental health services, and organizational development.

When selecting a program, it’s important to compare institutions based on curriculum, faculty expertise, and student support. The best psychology degree rankings in Florida as well as the best psychology degree rankings in Georgia can help prospective students identify top-performing schools in these states.

Region-specific rankings, such as top psychology programs in Grand Forks and top psychology degrees in Grand Rapids, provide insight into local opportunities and specialized programs. These tools make it easier to find the right fit based on location, career goals, and academic strengths.

Regardless of your chosen pathway, an online psychology degree can offer vast opportunities in both established and emerging fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Kaess

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles