World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4241 3920 193 190 261 10820

Peter Parzer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Parzer between 1991 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Parzer published across 34 years, from 1991 to 2024, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2021. 1 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2021. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1991 2024

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Parzer: publications per year, 1991 to 2024
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 5
1997 2
1998 2
1999 4
2000 3
2001 4
2002 8
2003 1
2004 7
2005 13
2006 7
2007 8
2008 12
2009 6
2010 5
2011 7
2012 14
2013 13
2014 15
2015 29
2016 14
2017 19
2018 11
2019 17
2020 8
2021 31
2022 14
2023 0
2024 1
Total 282
Download as CSV

Peter Parzer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Parzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 261 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 261
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Parzer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Parzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Parzer is affiliated with the University Hospital Heidelberg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with notable focus on clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, epidemiology, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter Parzer are:

  • Non-suicidal self-injury disorder as a stand-alone diagnosis in a consecutive help-seeking sample of adolescents (2020, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • Pain sensitivity and plasma beta-endorphin in adolescent non-suicidal self-injury (2020, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • The impact of COVID-19 related lockdown measures on self-reported psychopathology and health-related quality of life in German adolescents (2021, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry)
  • High-frequency ecological momentary assessment of emotional and interpersonal states preceding and following self-injury in female adolescents (2020, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry)
  • Excessive and pathological Internet use - Risk-behavior or psychopathology? (2021, Addictive Behaviors)

Peter Parzer frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

They have collaborated extensively with several co-authors including:

  • Michael Kaess
  • Franz Resch
  • Julian Koenig
  • Romuald Brunner
  • Denisa Ghinea

The broad thematic and disciplinary range of Peter Parzer's work reflects an interdisciplinary approach to child and adolescent mental health research, addressing complex topics related to self-injury, psychopathology, and emotional development.

Best Publications

  • Associations between depression and specific childhood experiences of abuse and neglect: a meta-analysis

    Maria Rita Infurna;Corinna Reichl;Peter Parzer;Adriano Schimmenti

  • Prevalence of pathological internet use among adolescents in Europe: demographic and social factors

    Tony Durkee;Michael Kaess;Vladimir Carli;Peter Parzer

  • Prevalence and Psychological Correlates of Occasional and Repetitive Deliberate Self-harm in Adolescents

    Romuald Brunner;Peter Parzer;Johann Haffner;Rainer Steen

  • Life-time prevalence and psychosocial correlates of adolescent direct self-injurious behavior: a comparative study of findings in 11 European countries.

    Romuald Brunner;Michael Kaess;Peter Parzer;Gloria Fischer

  • Adverse childhood experiences and their impact on frequency, severity, and the individual function of nonsuicidal self-injury in youth

    Michael Kaess;Peter Parzer;Margarete Mattern;Paul L. Plener

  • Entwicklungspsychopathologie des Kindes- und Jugendalters

    Franz Resch;Peter Parzer;Romuald M. Brunner;Johann Haffner

  • Pathological Internet use among European adolescents: psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours

    Michael Kaess;Tony Durkee;Romuald Brunner;Vladimir Carli

  • Alterations in the neuroendocrinological stress response to acute psychosocial stress in adolescents engaging in nonsuicidal self-injury

    Michael Kaess;Markus Hille;Peter Parzer;Christiane Maser-Gluth

  • The German version of the self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview (SITBI-G): a tool to assess non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior disorder

    Gloria Fischer;Nina Ameis;Peter Parzer;Paul L Plener

  • Estrogen, menstrual cycle phases, and psychopathology in women suffering from schizophrenia.

    Niels Bergemann;Peter Parzer;Benno Runnebaum;Franz Resch

  • Reduced prefrontal and orbitofrontal gray matter in female adolescents with borderline personality disorder: is it disorder specific?

    Romuald Brunner;Romy Henze;Romy Henze;Peter Parzer;Jasmin Kramer

  • Explaining gender differences in non-fatal suicidal behaviour among adolescents: a population-based study.

    Michael Kaess;Michael Kaess;Peter Parzer;Johann Haffner;Rainer Steen

  • Pathological Internet use among adolescents: Comparing gamers and non-gamers.

    Esther Strittmatter;Michael Kaess;Peter Parzer;Gloria Fischer

  • Dissociative symptomatology and traumatogenic factors in adolescent psychiatric patients.

    Romuald Brunner;Peter Parzer;Volker Schuld;Franz Resch

  • Psychosocial support for war‐traumatized child and adolescent refugees: evaluation of a short‐term treatment program

    Heike Möhlen;Peter Parzer;Franz Resch;Romuald Brunner

  • Butterbur root extract and music therapy in the prevention of childhood migraine: An explorative study

    Rieke Oelkers-Ax;Anne Leins;Peter Parzer;Thomas Hillecke

  • Plasma concentrations of estradiol in women suffering from schizophrenia treated with conventional versus atypical antipsychotics

    Niels Bergemann;Christoph Mundt;Peter Parzer;Iris Jannakos

  • Axis I and II comorbidity and psychosocial functioning in female adolescents with borderline personality disorder.

    Michael Kaess;Ina-Alexandra von Ceumern-Lindenstjerna;Peter Parzer;Andrew Chanen

  • Emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents with primary headache

    U Just;R Oelkers;S Bender;P Parzer

  • A 2-year longitudinal study of prospective predictors of pathological Internet use in adolescents

    Esther Strittmatter;Peter Parzer;Romuald Brunner;Gloria Fischer

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz Resch
Franz Resch Heidelberg University
Michael Kaess
Michael Kaess University of Bern
Romuald Brunner
Romuald Brunner Heidelberg University
Danuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman Karolinska Institute
Christina W. Hoven
Christina W. Hoven Columbia University
Marco Sarchiapone
Marco Sarchiapone University of Molise
Christoph Mundt
Christoph Mundt Heidelberg University
Julio Bobes
Julio Bobes University of Oviedo
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Alan Apter
Alan Apter Reichman University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA often opens doors to related online degrees such as social work, counseling, and human services. These fields offer flexible learning options, making it easier for students to balance their studies with other commitments.

Students interested in social work may want to investigate the most valuable online social work degree programs in Nevada, which provide comprehensive training and strong career prospects. In addition, there are opportunities to pursue the best value online social work degrees in Ohio and the most valuable online social work degrees in Tennessee, both known for their quality curriculum and affordability.

Job outlook in psychology and related fields is promising, especially for those who select programs recognized for their value. For those located further south, the best value online social work degrees in Texas stand out for flexible learning and strong graduate outcomes. These degrees connect graduates to career paths in clinical practice, school counseling, community services, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Parzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles