World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7747 7229 371 364 168 10854

Klaus Wölfling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Klaus Wölfling between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Klaus Wölfling published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2017. 19 of the 233 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2017. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
2005 2025

233 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Klaus Wölfling: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 4
2008 4
2009 8
2010 3
2011 15
2012 9
2013 17
2014 24
2015 17
2016 12
2017 27
2018 7
2019 16
2020 9
2021 12
2022 19
2023 10
2024 11
2025 8
Total 233
Download as CSV

Klaus Wölfling publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Wölfling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Klaus Wölfling D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Wölfling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Klaus Wölfling is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on areas within the social sciences and psychology, with a significant concentration on topics related to technology's impact on behavior and mental health.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, they have contributed extensively to various subfields such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Gender Studies

Their research covers a wide range of topics, highlighting interests in technology and its social and psychological effects. These topics include:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Klaus Wölfling has coauthored academic work with several recurring collaborators, including:

  • Kai W. Müller
  • Michael Dreier
  • Manfred E. Beutel
  • Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
  • Astrid Müller

They have published frequently in venues such as:

  • Suchttherapie
  • SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • BMJ Open

Notable papers authored or coauthored by Klaus Wölfling include:

  • "Discounting delayed monetary rewards and decision making in behavioral addictions - A comparison between patients with gambling disorder and internet gaming disorder", 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • "Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study", 2021, Addiction
  • "Assessment of Criteria for Specific Internet-use Disorders (ACSID-11): Introduction of a new screening instrument capturing ICD-11 criteria for gaming disorder and other potential Internet-use disorders", 2022, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "Addiction Research Unit: Affective and cognitive mechanisms of specific Internet-use disorders", 2021, Addiction Biology
  • "Vereinheitlichung der Bezeichnungen für Verhaltenssüchte", 2021, SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice

Additionally, Klaus Wölfling has contributed to book literature, including the publication:

  • "Ratgeber Glücksspielsucht", 2023, Hogrefe Verlag

Best Publications

  • Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model.

    Matthias Brand;Matthias Brand;Kimberly S. Young;Christian Laier;Klaus Wölfling

  • The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors.

    Matthias Brand;Matthias Brand;Elisa Wegmann;Rudolf Stark;Astrid Müller

  • The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale – psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample

    Eva M. Klein;Elmar Brähler;Michael Dreier;Leonard Reinecke

  • Regular gaming behavior and internet gaming disorder in European adolescents: results from a cross-national representative survey of prevalence, predictors, and psychopathological correlates

    K. W. Müller;M. Janikian;M. Dreier;K. Wölfling

  • Digital Stress over the Life Span: The Effects of Communication Load and Internet Multitasking on Perceived Stress and Psychological Health Impairments in a German Probability Sample

    Leonard Reinecke;Stefan Aufenanger;Manfred E. Beutel;Michael Dreier

  • Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.

    Hans Jürgen Rumpf;Sophia Achab;Sophia Achab;Joël Billieux;Henrietta Bowden-Jones

  • A hidden type of internet addiction? Intense and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents

    K.W. Müller;M. Dreier;M.E. Beutel;E. Duven

  • Procrastination, Distress and Life Satisfaction across the Age Range - A German Representative Community Study.

    Manfred E. Beutel;Eva M. Klein;Stefan Aufenanger;Elmar Brähler

  • Investigating risk factors for Internet gaming disorder: a comparison of patients with addictive gaming, pathological gamblers and healthy controls regarding the big five personality traits.

    Kai W. Müller;M. E. Beutel;B. Egloff;K. Wölfling

  • Specific cue reactivity on computer game-related cues in excessive gamers.

    Unknown

  • Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study.

    Jesús Castro-Calvo;Daniel L. King;Dan J. Stein;Matthias Brand

  • Efficacy of Short-term Treatment of Internet and Computer Game Addiction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Klaus Wölfling;Kai W. Müller;Michael Dreier;Christian Ruckes

  • Prevalence of internet addiction in the general population: results from a German population-based survey

    Kai W. Müller;Heide Glaesmer;Elmar Brähler;Klaus Woelfling

  • [Computer game playing: clinical characteristics of dependence and abuse among adolescents].

    Dominik Batthyány;Kai W Müller;Frank Benker;Klaus Wölfling

  • To gamble or not to gamble: at risk for craving and relapse--learned motivated attention in pathological gambling.

    Klaus Wölfling;Chantal P. Mörsen;Eva Duven;Ulrike Albrecht

  • Free-to-play: About addicted Whales, at risk Dolphins and healthy Minnows. Monetarization design and Internet Gaming Disorder.

    M. Dreier;K. Wölfling;E. Duven;S. Giralt

  • Psychophysiological responses to drug-associated stimuli in chronic heavy cannabis use.

    Klaus Wölfling;Herta Flor;Sabine M. Grüsser

  • [Reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment of Pathological Computer-Gaming (CSV-S)].

    Klaus Wölfling;Kai W. Müller;Manfred Beutel

  • Regular and Problematic Leisure-Time Internet Use in the Community: Results from a German Population-Based Survey

    Manfred E. Beutel;Elmar Brähler;Heide Glaesmer;Daria J. Kuss

  • Excessive internet use in European adolescents: What determines differences in severity?

    Lukas Blinka;Kateřina Škařupová;Anna Ševčíková;Klaus Wölfling

  • A contribution to the clinical characterization of Internet addiction in a sample of treatment seekers: Validity of assessment, severity of psychopathology and type of co-morbidity

    K.W. Müller;M.E. Beutel;K. Wölfling

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Matthias Brand
Matthias Brand University of Duisburg-Essen
Elmar Brähler
Elmar Brähler Leipzig University
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf University of Lübeck
Karl Mann
Karl Mann Heidelberg University
Leonard Reinecke
Leonard Reinecke Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
Rudolf Stark
Rudolf Stark University of Giessen
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online programs and career opportunities in the helping professions. Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for students to balance education with personal or professional commitments. These degrees can lead to roles such as counselors, therapists, or mental health professionals.

It’s important to understand the requirements for licensure, which can differ by state and even by city. For example, those interested in counseling in Hawaii will need to meet the licensed therapist requirements in Honolulu. Aspiring professionals in Texas should be aware of the specifics involved in becoming a licensed therapist in Houston.

Likewise, students should research the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Huntsville or fulfilling the Indianapolis licensed therapist requirements. Take time to review your state and local regulations as you plan your career pathway in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Wölfling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles