World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elmar Brähler

Elmar Brähler

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
53160
World Ranking
5704
National Ranking
315

Psychology

D-Index
111
Citations
54157
World Ranking
375
National Ranking
13

Elmar Brähler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elmar Brähler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 957 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elmar Brähler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elmar Brähler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elmar Brähler is affiliated with Leipzig University in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields including psychology, medicine, and social sciences, with a primary focus on clinical psychology and general health professions.

The scientist's recent work explores a wide variety of mental health topics, psychological well-being, and social factors influencing health. Some of the most cited papers include:

  • Loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis, 2022, American Psychologist
  • Similarities and Differences of Mental Health in Women and Men: A Systematic Review of Findings in Three Large German Cohorts, 2021, Frontiers in Public Health
  • Update of the standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population, 2022, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Prevalence and psychopathology of vegetarians and vegans - Results from a representative survey in Germany, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Noise annoyance predicts symptoms of depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance 5 years later. Findings from the Gutenberg Health Study, 2020, European Journal of Public Health

Frequent coauthors in their body of work include:

  • Manfred E. Beutel
  • Jörg M. Fegert
  • Markus Zenger
  • Mareike Ernst
  • Ana N. Tibubos

Publications appear regularly in journals and venues such as:

  • PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Scientific Reports
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Elmar Brähler's main fields of study and subfields highlight their interdisciplinary approach:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Social Sciences

  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Health
  • Social Psychology

The core topics of exploration within their research encompass:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Employment and Welfare Studies

Best Publications

  • Validation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population

    Bernd Löwe;Oliver Decker;Stefanie Müller;Elmar Brähler

  • A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: Validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population.

    Bernd Löwe;Inka Wahl;Matthias Rose;Carsten Spitzer

  • Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health.

    Manfred E. Beutel;Eva M. Klein;Elmar Brähler;Iris Reiner

  • Prediction of Institutionalization in the Elderly. A Systematic Review

    Melanie Luppa;Tobias Luck;Siegfried Weyerer;Hans-Helmut König

  • Depression and anxiety in labor migrants and refugees--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jutta Lindert;Ondine S. von Ehrenstein;Stefan Priebe;Andreas Mielck

  • Prevalence of complicated grief in a representative population-based sample

    Anette Kersting;Elmar Brähler;Heide Glaesmer;Birgit Wagner

  • Standardization of the depression screener patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population.

    Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent;Andreas Hinz;Elmar Brähler

  • The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale – psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample

    Eva M. Klein;Elmar Brähler;Michael Dreier;Leonard Reinecke

  • The somatic symptom scale-8 (SSS-8): a brief measure of somatic symptom burden.

    Benjamin Gierk;Sebastian Kohlmann;Kurt Kroenke;Kurt Kroenke;Kurt Kroenke;Lena Spangenberg

  • Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3).

    Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent;Lorenz Berg;Manfred E. Beutel;Andreas Hinz

  • Four-Week Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Patients With Cancer Across Major Tumor Entities

    Anja Mehnert;Elmar Brähler;Hermann Faller;Martin Härter

  • One in two cancer patients is significantly distressed: Prevalence and indicators of distress.

    A. Mehnert;T.J. Hartung;M. Friedrich;S. Vehling

  • The prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder: a population-based survey

    Winfried Rief;Ulrike Buhlmann;Sabine Wilhelm;Ada Borkenhagen

  • Fibromyalgia prevalence, somatic symptom reporting, and the dimensionality of polysymptomatic distress: results from a survey of the general population.

    Frederick Wolfe;Elmar Brähler;Andreas Hinz;Winfried Häuser

  • Updates on the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder: A population-based survey

    Ulrike Buhlmann;Heide Glaesmer;Ricarda Mewes;Jeanne M. Fama

  • Teststatistische Prüfung und Normierung der deutschen Versionen des EUROHIS-QOL Lebensqualität-Index und des WHO-5 Wohlbefindens-Index

    Elmar Brähler;Holger Mühlan;Cornelia Albani;Silke Schmidt

  • Prevalence of mental health conditions in cancer patients in acute care—a meta-analysis

    S. Singer;S. Singer;J. Das-Munshi;E. Brähler

  • Normative values for the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in the general German population.

    Andreas Hinz;Elmar Brähler

  • Die Resilienzskala - Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personmerkmal.

    Jörg Schumacher;Karena Leppert;Thomas Gunzelrnann;Bernhard Strauß

  • Sleep quality in the general population: psychometric properties of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, derived from a German community sample of 9284 people

    Andreas Hinz;Heide Glaesmer;Elmar Brähler;Elmar Brähler;Markus Löffler

  • Psychometric properties and population-based norms of the Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R)

    Heide Glaesmer;Winfried Rief;Alexandra Martin;Ricarda Mewes

Frequent Co-Authors

Heide Glaesmer
Heide Glaesmer Leipzig University
Andreas Hinz
Andreas Hinz Leipzig University
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Winfried Häuser
Winfried Häuser Technical University of Munich
Anja Hilbert
Anja Hilbert Leipzig University
Uwe Koch
Uwe Koch Universität Hamburg
Anja Mehnert
Anja Mehnert Leipzig University
Franz Petermann
Franz Petermann University of Bremen
Jörg M. Fegert
Jörg M. Fegert University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a range of rewarding career pathways, particularly for those interested in counseling and mental health services. Many students pursue careers such as substance abuse counselors, where professionals help individuals overcome addiction and lead healthier lives.

Requirements for becoming a substance abuse counselor can vary significantly by location. For instance, you can review Durham substance abuse counselors education requirements to see what is expected in North Carolina. Similarly, those considering careers in Texas should examine the substance abuse counselor requirements in Fort Worth.

Certification and degree prerequisites also differ in other cities. For example, aspiring professionals should understand the El Paso substance abuse counselor certification requirements in Texas, as well as the substance abuse counselor requirements in Fort Wayne in Indiana.

By choosing an accredited online program, you can gain the education and skills needed to meet certification requirements in many states, setting the stage for a fulfilling career in psychology and behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing Elmar Brähler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles