World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Härter

Martin Härter

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
28361
World Ranking
14541
National Ranking
771

Psychology

D-Index
84
Citations
27470
World Ranking
1221
National Ranking
45

Martin Härter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Härter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 529 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin Härter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Härter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Härter is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine, psychology, and health professions. Their body of work includes a significant focus on general health professions, clinical psychology, and public health, environmental and occupational health, with additional interest in social psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The research topics covered by Martin Härter embrace diverse aspects of healthcare and mental health, including:

  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Psychiatric Care and Mental Health Services
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health and Medical Studies
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare

The publications of Martin Härter have appeared frequently in several well-known venues, with multiple contributions particularly to:

  • Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
  • BMJ Open
  • PLoS ONE
  • Health Expectations

Recent works include:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis, 2020, published in Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7), 2020, published in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Multi-organ assessment in mainly non-hospitalized individuals after SARS-CoV-2 infection: The Hamburg City Health Study COVID programme, 2021, published in European Heart Journal
  • Quality of life, level of functioning, and its relationship with mental and physical disorders in the elderly: results from the MentDis_ICF65+ study, 2020, published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Cancer patients' preferred and perceived level of involvement in treatment decision-making: an epidemiological study, 2020, published in Acta Oncologica

Collaboration has been an essential aspect of Martin Härter's research activity, with frequent coauthors including Levente Kriston, Isabelle Scholl, Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Bernd Löwe, and Sarah Liebherz. These partnerships have supported multi-disciplinary contributions across psychology, health research, and clinical practice investigations.

Best Publications

  • A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process

    Glyn Elwyn;Marie Anne Durand;Julia Song;Johanna Aarts

  • The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample

    Levente Kriston;Isabelle Scholl;Lars Hölzel;Daniela Simon

  • An integrative model of patient-centeredness - a systematic review and concept analysis

    Isabelle Scholl;Jördis M. Zill;Martin Härter;Jörg Dirmaier

  • Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3).

    Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent;Lorenz Berg;Manfred E. Beutel;Andreas Hinz

  • Four-Week Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Patients With Cancer Across Major Tumor Entities

    Anja Mehnert;Elmar Brähler;Hermann Faller;Martin Härter

  • One in two cancer patients is significantly distressed: Prevalence and indicators of distress.

    A. Mehnert;T.J. Hartung;M. Friedrich;S. Vehling

  • Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)

    Anne Toussaint;Paul Hüsing;Antje Gumz;Katja Wingenfeld

  • Assessing the Quality of Decision Support Technologies Using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi)

    Glyn Elwyn;Annette M. O'Connor;Carol Bennett;Robert Gordon Newcombe

  • Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials

    Dirk Eyding;Monika Lelgemann;Ulrich Grouven;Martin Härter

  • The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: A cluster-randomized controlled trial

    Andreas Loh;Daniela Simon;Celia E. Wills;Levente Kriston

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Associations between anxiety disorders and physical illness.

    Martin C. Härter;Kevin P. Conway;Kathleen R. Merikangas

  • The prevalence of mental disorders in older people in Western countries - a meta-analysis.

    Jana Volkert;Holger Schulz;Martin Härter;Olga Wlodarczyk

  • Prevalence of mental disorders in elderly people: the European MentDis_ICF65+ study

    Sylke Andreas;Holger Schulz;Jana Volkert;Maria Dehoust

  • Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.

    Isabelle Scholl;Marije Koelewijn-van Loon;Karen Sepucha;Glyn Elwyn

  • Risk factors for chronic depression--a systematic review.

    Lars Hölzel;Martin Härter;Martin Härter;Christina Reese;Levente Kriston

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression

    Andreas Loh;Rainer Leonhart;Celia E. Wills;Daniela Simon

  • The risk of being depressed is significantly higher in cancer patients than in the general population: Prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms across major cancer types

    T.J. Hartung;E. Brähler;H. Faller;M. Härter

  • Increased 12-Month Prevalence Rates of Mental Disorders in Patients with Chronic Somatic Diseases

    Martin Härter;Harald Baumeister;Katrin Reuter;Frank Jacobi

  • Prevalence of mental disorders based on general population surveys

    Harald Baumeister;Martin Härter

Frequent Co-Authors

Levente Kriston
Levente Kriston Universität Hamburg
Holger Schulz
Holger Schulz Universität Hamburg
Karl Wegscheider
Karl Wegscheider Universität Hamburg
Anja Mehnert
Anja Mehnert Leipzig University
Hans-Helmut König
Hans-Helmut König Universität Hamburg
Joachim Weis
Joachim Weis RWTH Aachen University
Harald Baumeister
Harald Baumeister University of Ulm
Frank Schneider
Frank Schneider Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Uwe Koch
Uwe Koch Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways. One rapidly growing field is speech-language pathology, which requires specialized knowledge in communication sciences and disorders. Those interested in this field often pursue master’s-level qualifications and licensure specific to their state.

Requirements can significantly vary between states. If you’re interested in learning how to become a speech language pathologist in Arkansas, you must follow Arkansas’s unique certification process. Likewise, SLP requirements in California include specific educational and clinical experience standards.

Other states set their own guidelines and exams. For example, you can explore Colorado SLP certification requirements or discover the steps for becoming a speech therapist in Connecticut. Aspiring professionals should research each state’s requirements and consider accredited online programs as a flexible pathway to enter or advance in these rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Härter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles