World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
59666
World Ranking
3584
National Ranking
1976

Glyn Elwyn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glyn Elwyn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 634 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Glyn Elwyn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glyn Elwyn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glyn Elwyn is affiliated with the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in the United States. The primary fields of study in their research include Health Professions and Medicine, with a substantial focus on General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their work also encompasses domains such as Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Oncology.

The scientist's research topics cover areas related to patient interaction and healthcare quality. These include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Healthcare Systems and Technology, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Health Literacy and Information Accessibility, and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy.

Glyn Elwyn has contributed extensively to several publication venues. Most frequently, their work appears in:

  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMJ evidence-based medicine
  • BMJ Open
  • PLoS ONE

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Catherine Saunders, Marie-Anne Durand, Peter Scalia, Renata W. Yen, and Rachel C Forcino.

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Glyn Elwyn include:

  • "Implications for Telehealth in a Postpandemic Future" (2020), published in JAMA
  • "Practical thematic analysis: a guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis" (2023), published in BMJ
  • "Using pictures to convey health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects on patient and consumer health behaviors and outcomes" (2020), published in Patient Education and Counseling
  • "Shared decision making: What is the work?" (2020), published in Patient Education and Counseling
  • "Understanding unwarranted variation in clinical practice: a focus on network effects, reflective medicine and learning health systems" (2020), published in International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Best Publications

  • Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice

    Glyn Elwyn;Glyn Elwyn;Dominick Frosch;Dominick Frosch;Richard Thomson;Natalie J. Joseph-Williams

  • Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process

    Glyn Elwyn;Annette O'Connor;Dawn Stacey;Robert Volk

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

    Carl R May;Frances Mair;Tracy Finch;Anne E. MacFarlane

  • Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making

    Natalie Joseph-Williams;Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards

  • Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare

    A M Stiggelbout;T Van der Weijden;M P T De Wit;D Frosch

  • Implementing shared decision making in the NHS

    Glyn Elwyn;Steve Laitner;Angela Coulter;Emma Walker

  • Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices.

    Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards;Paul Richard Kinnersley;Richard Grol

  • A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process

    Glyn Elwyn;Marie Anne Durand;Julia Song;Johanna Aarts

  • Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures

    Adrian G. Edwards;Glyn Elwyn;Al Mulley

  • Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

    Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards;Paul Richard Kinnersley

  • Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter

    Albert G Mulley;Chris Trimble;Glyn Elwyn

  • Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

    Dawn Stacey;Stéphane Turcotte;Marie-Joëlle Cossi

  • Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

    Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards;M. Wensing;Kerenza Hood

  • Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes.

    Adrian G. Edwards;Glyn Elwyn;Judith Covey;Elaine Matthews

  • Shared decision-making in health care : achieving evidence-based patient choice

    Adrian G. Edwards;Glyn Elwyn

  • Authoritarian Physicians And Patients’ Fear Of Being Labeled ‘Difficult’ Among Key Obstacles To Shared Decision Making

    Dominick L. Frosch;Suepattra G. May;Katharine A.S. Rendle;Caroline Tietbohl

  • The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks.

    Glyn Elwyn;Hayley Hutchings;Adrian Edwards;Frances Rapport

  • Assessments of the extent to which health‐care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument

    Nicolas Couët;Sophie Desroches;Sophie Desroches;Hubert Robitaille;Hugues Vaillancourt

  • Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Marie-Anne Durand;Lewis Carpenter;Hayley Dolan;Paulina Bravo

  • Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

    Rhéda Adekpedjou;Dawn Stacey;Stéphane Turcotte

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Edwards
Adrian Edwards Cardiff University
Richard Grol
Richard Grol Radboud University
Michel Wensing
Michel Wensing Heidelberg University
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford
Fiona Wood
Fiona Wood Cardiff University
Robert G. Newcombe
Robert G. Newcombe Cardiff University
Kerenza Hood
Kerenza Hood Cardiff University
Paul K. J. Han
Paul K. J. Han Maine Medical Center
Martin Härter
Martin Härter Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean attending a traditional, on-campus program. There are various flexible, accredited online degrees that can help you enter or advance in healthcare—while also saving time and money. Many students begin with nursing. If you’re considering this route, check out some of the cheapest online nursing programs available, which offer quality education at lower tuition costs.

For those already registered nurses, pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Nursing can open doors to more leadership roles. You can find the cheapest bsn programs online, allowing you to study while continuing to work. Those interested in research, academics, or leadership may also want to look into phd in nursing online programs.

Even if your bachelor’s degree isn’t in nursing, there are pathways. Some of the non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs offer a direct route to advanced nursing degrees. These online options make it easier for more people to transition into rewarding healthcare careers, regardless of their current background.

Best Scientists Citing Glyn Elwyn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles