World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
52
Citations
24226
World Ranking
2355
National Ranking
167

Lyndal Trevena publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyndal Trevena sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 223 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lyndal Trevena D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyndal Trevena sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lyndal Trevena is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and conducts research primarily within the fields of Health Professions and Medicine. Their work notably spans several subfields, including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Oncology.

Their research concentrates on key topics such as Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Health Literacy and Information Accessibility, Health Policy Implementation Science, Migration, Health and Trauma, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy.

Lyndal Trevena has contributed to several publications, including recent papers of note:

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions, 2024, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Current Best Practice for Presenting Probabilities in Patient Decision Aids: Fundamental Principles, 2021, Medical Decision Making
  • Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts, 2021, Medical Decision Making
  • Parent-level barriers to uptake of childhood vaccination: a global overview of systematic reviews, 2021, BMJ Global Health

Their frequent coauthors include Carissa Bonner, Danielle Marie Muscat, Amelia K. Smit, Anne Ε. Cust, and Pinika Patel, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts.

Lyndal Trevena's work is regularly published in several academic venues, notably Medical Decision Making, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Implementation Science Communications, Genetics in Medicine, and JMIR Cardio.

Best Publications

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

    Dawn Stacey;Dawn Stacey;Krystina Lewis;Michael J Barry

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

    Unknown

  • Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare

    A M Stiggelbout;T Van der Weijden;M P T De Wit;D Frosch

  • A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process

    Glyn Elwyn;Marie Anne Durand;Julia Song;Johanna Aarts

  • Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers

    Lyndal J. Trevena;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Adrian Edwards;Wolfgang Gaissmaier

  • Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.

    Sian K. Smith;Ann Dixon;Lyndal Trevena;Donald Nutbeam

  • Shared decision making: What do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?

    Tammy C Hoffmann;Tammy C Hoffmann;Magenta B Simmons;Kevin McNamara

  • A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence

    Lyndal J Trevena;Alexandra Barratt;Phyllis Butow;Patrina Caldwell

  • Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world

    Paul Glasziou;Sharon Straus;Shannon Brownlee;Lyndal J. Trevena

  • A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial

    Sian K. Smith;Lyndal Trevena;Judy M. Simpson;Alexandra Barratt

  • Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross-over trial

    Heather L. Shepherd;Heather L. Shepherd;Alexandra Barratt;Lyndal J. Trevena;Kevin McGeechan

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

    Unknown

  • The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer

    Jon D Emery;Katie Shaw;Briony Williams;Danielle Mazza

  • Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare

    Danielle M Muscat;Heather L Shepherd;Don Nutbeam;Lyndal Trevena

  • Systematic review of instruments for measuring nurses' knowledge, skills and attitudes for evidence-based practice

    Kat Leung;Lyndal Trevena;Donna Waters

  • A Systematic Review of Quality Assessment Methods for Smartphone Health Apps

    Nasser F. BinDhim;Alexandra Hawkey;Lyndal Trevena

  • Current Best Practice for Presenting Probabilities in Patient Decision Aids: Fundamental Principles

    Carissa Bonner;Lyndal J. Trevena;Wolfgang Gaissmaier;Paul K. J. Han

  • Depression screening via a smartphone app: cross-country user characteristics and feasibility.

    Nasser F. BinDhim;Ahmed M. Shaman;Lyndal J. Trevena;Mada H. Basyouni

  • Are Current Psychometric Tools suitable for Measuring Outcomes of Diabetes Education

    C Eigenmann;R Colagiuri;Timothy Skinner;L Trevena

  • Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening.

    Alexandra Barratt;Lyndal Trevena;Heather M Davey;Kirsten McCaffery

  • Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study.

    Cate Wallace;Julie Leask;Lyndal J Trevena

  • Smartphone Smoking Cessation Application (SSC App) trial: a multicountry double-blind automated randomised controlled trial of a smoking cessation decision-aid ‘app’

    Nasser F BinDhim;Kevin McGeechan;Lyndal Trevena

  • Can consumers learn to ask three questions to improve shared decision making? A feasibility study of the ASK (AskShareKnow) Patient-Clinician Communication Model(®) intervention in a primary health-care setting.

    Heather L Shepherd;Alexandra Barratt;Anna Jones;Deborah Bateson

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirsten McCaffery
Kirsten McCaffery University of Sydney
Les Irwig
Les Irwig University of Sydney
Don Nutbeam
Don Nutbeam University of Sydney
Julie Leask
Julie Leask University of Sydney
Phyllis Butow
Phyllis Butow University of Sydney
Bettina Meiser
Bettina Meiser University of New South Wales
Stacy M Carter
Stacy M Carter University of Wollongong
Glyn Elwyn
Glyn Elwyn Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Judy M. Simpson
Judy M. Simpson University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities has never been more flexible, thanks to a variety of online degree options. Today, students can complete their studies faster by enrolling in accelerated programs, which allow you to earn your bachelor’s degree quickly while balancing other commitments.

Those seeking to deepen their expertise can consider online master's programs that are both convenient and time-efficient, often designed to be completed in just a year. If you are aiming for a career in social work, there are cheap msw programs online that provide quality education at a lower cost compared to traditional options.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, bcba masters programs offer an affordable pathway to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. With these diverse online pathways, you can align your education goals with your budget, schedule, and career aspirations in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Lyndal Trevena

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles