World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8864 8276 4716 4291 95 6259

Jason M. Holland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jason M. Holland between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jason M. Holland published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 3 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1980 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jason M. Holland: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 5
2007 3
2008 4
2009 5
2010 7
2011 5
2012 6
2013 7
2014 14
2015 15
2016 9
2017 5
2018 2
2019 1
2020 5
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 3
Total 103
Download as CSV

Jason M. Holland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason M. Holland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jason M. Holland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason M. Holland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jason M. Holland is affiliated with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily in Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Sociology and Political Science, and Ophthalmology.

The scientist's work explores a range of topics that include:

  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Glaucoma and Retinal Disorders
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Jason M. Holland has contributed to these topics through multiple publications, including the following papers:

  • "Regret and unfinished business in parents bereaved by cancer: A mixed methods study," published in 2020 in Palliative Medicine
  • "Evidence on the Use of Topical Ciclosporin for Ocular Surface Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," published in 2025 in Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
  • "Unfinished Business in Bereavement Scale," published in 2020 in PsycTESTS Dataset
  • "Evidence on the Use of Topical Ciclosporin for Ocular Surface Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-Response," published in 2025 in Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

The venues where Jason M. Holland frequently publishes their work are:

  • Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
  • Palliative Medicine
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Wendy G. Lichtenthal
  • Robert A. Neimeyer
  • Ngozi Charity Chidi-Egboka
  • Leo Fan
  • M Muddasir Qureshi

Through this body of work, Jason M. Holland contributes research across diverse areas primarily addressing mental health aspects of grief and bereavement, as well as clinical ophthalmology topics related to ocular surface disease and treatments. Their interdisciplinary approach is reflected in the breadth of research fields and topics represented.

Best Publications

  • Sense-making, grief, and the experience of violent loss: toward a mediational model.

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Moral Injury Questionnaire—Military Version

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Kent Drescher;David Foy

  • Meaning Reconstruction in the First Two Years of Bereavement: The Role of Sense-Making and Benefit-Finding

    Jason M. Holland;Joseph M. Currier;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Moral Injury, Meaning Making, and Mental Health in Returning Veterans

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Jesse Malott

  • The effectiveness of bereavement interventions with children: a meta-analytic review of controlled outcome research.

    Joseph M Currier;Jason M Holland;Robert A Neimeyer

  • Reducing the risk of burnout in end-of-life care settings: The role of daily spiritual experiences and training

    Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • The Integration of Stressful Life Experiences Scale (ISLES): Development and Initial Validation of a New Measure

    Jason M. Holland;Joseph M. Currier;Rachel A. Coleman;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • An Examination of Stage Theory of Grief among Individuals Bereaved by Natural and Violent Causes: A Meaning-Oriented Contribution

    Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • The Underlying Structure of Grief: A Taxometric Investigation of Prolonged and Normal Reactions to Loss

    Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer;Paul A. Boelen;Holly G. Prigerson;Holly G. Prigerson

  • Psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer.

    W Breitbart;J Holland

  • Bereavement following violent death: An assault on life and meaning.

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Rachel A. Coleman;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Spirituality Factors in the Prediction of Outcomes of PTSD Treatment for U.S. Military Veterans

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Kent D. Drescher

  • Separation and Traumatic Distress in Prolonged Grief: The Role of Cause of Death and Relationship to the Deceased

    Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Spirituality, Forgiveness, and Quality of Life: Testing a Mediational Model with Military Veterans with PTSD

    Joseph M. Currier;Kent D. Drescher;Jason M. Holland;Ross Lisman

  • Assumptive Worldviews and Problematic Reactions to Bereavement

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Outcomes From the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) Program for Bereaved Caregivers

    Jason M. Holland;Joseph M. Currier;Dolores Gallagher-Thompson

  • Validation of the Integration of Stressful Life Experiences Scale–Short Form in a Bereaved Sample

    Jason M. Holland;Joseph M. Currier;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Intraclass Correlation Associated with Therapists: Estimates and Applications in Planning Psychotherapy Research

    Scott A. Baldwin;David M. Murray;William R. Shadish;Sherri L. Pals

  • Involvement in abusive violence among Vietnam veterans: Direct and indirect associations with substance use problems and suicidality

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Hannah W. Jones;Susan Sheu

  • Inventory of Complicated Spiritual Grief: Development and Validation of a New Measure

    Laurie A. Burke;Robert A. Neimeyer;Jason M. Holland;Sharon Dennard

  • Circumstances of Death and Complicated Grief: Indirect Associations Through Meaning Made of Loss

    Vincent Rozalski;Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph M. Currier
Joseph M. Currier University of South Alabama
Robert A. Neimeyer
Robert A. Neimeyer University of Memphis
Dolores Gallagher-Thompson
Dolores Gallagher-Thompson Stanford University School of Medicine
Larry W. Thompson
Larry W. Thompson Stanford University
David W. Foy
David W. Foy Pepperdine University
William Breitbart
William Breitbart Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Brad Donohue
Brad Donohue University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Holly G. Prigerson
Holly G. Prigerson Cornell University
Daniel N. Allen
Daniel N. Allen University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Shelli R. Kesler
Shelli R. Kesler The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA often leads students to consider specialized online degrees and varied career paths. Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) is a popular option, offering growth opportunities across the country. Requirements for becoming a licensed MFT can vary greatly by location.

For instance, if you want to learn how to become an mft in Virginia Beach, you will need to fulfill specific educational and clinical experience standards. Similarly, those interested in practice in the capital can review exact steps for how to become an mft in Washington DC.

The Wichita mft certification requirements detail the necessary coursework, supervised hours, and examination needs for Kansas. Meanwhile, students should examine the Winston Salem mft education requirements to ensure compliance with North Carolina licensing standards.

Overall, pursuing an online psychology degree can open the door to rewarding careers in mental health, but understanding regional requirements is crucial for your future success.

Best Scientists Citing Jason M. Holland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles