World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Mengel

Michael Mengel

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
30739
World Ranking
14012
National Ranking
582

Michael Mengel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Mengel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 318 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Mengel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Mengel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Mengel is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and specializes in the field of Medicine with a focus on transplantation. Their research encompasses a broad array of subfields including Transplantation, Surgery, Nephrology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their main topics of work cover key areas within transplantation and renal health, notably:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

Michael Mengel has contributed to multiple prominent publications, with frequent appearances in these venues:

  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Kidney International
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Transplantation

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Mengel include:

  • Banff 2019 Meeting Report: Molecular diagnostics in solid organ transplantation-Consensus for the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) gene panel and open source multicenter validation, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation

Other significant papers in close collaboration or related to Mengel's research field include:

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation
  • The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics, 2023, American Journal of Transplantation
  • Thirty years of the International Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology: the past, present, and future of kidney transplant diagnostics, 2021, Kidney International
  • Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 Working Group Meeting Report, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation

Frequent coauthors who collaborate with Mengel include:

  • Benjamin Adam
  • Alexandre Loupy
  • Roslyn B. Mannon
  • Mark Haas
  • Carmen Lefaucheur

In addition to journal articles, Michael Mengel has contributed to book publications, notably a title by Springer Science+Business Media: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Digital Pathology published in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;M. Haas

  • Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence.

    J. Sellarés;D. G. de Freitas;M. Mengel;J. Reeve

  • Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN').

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;B. Sis

  • Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions

    M. Haas;B. Sis;L. C. Racusen;K. Solez

  • The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials

    M. Haas;A. Loupy;C. Lefaucheur;C. Roufosse

  • Banff '09 meeting report: Antibody mediated graft deterioration and implementation of Banff working groups

    B. Sis;M. Mengel;M. Haas;R. B. Colvin

  • Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure.

    G. Einecke;B. Sis;J. Reeve;M. Mengel

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection

    Alexandre Loupy;Mark Haas;Candice Roufosse;Maarten Naesens

  • The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology.

    A. Loupy;M. Haas;K. Solez;L. Racusen

  • A 2018 Reference Guide to the Banff Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology.

    Candice Roufosse;Naomi Simmonds;Marian Clahsen-van Groningen;Mark Haas

  • The Renal Arterial Resistance Index and Renal Allograft Survival

    Jörg Radermacher;Michael Mengel;Sebastian Ellis;Stephan Stuht

  • Banff 2011 Meeting Report: New Concepts in Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

    M. Mengel;B. Sis;M. Haas;R. B. Colvin

  • NK cell transcripts and NK cells in kidney biopsies from patients with donor-specific antibodies: evidence for NK cell involvement in antibody-mediated rejection.

    L. G. Hidalgo;B. Sis;J. Sellares;P. M. Campbell

  • CXCR4/CXCL12 expression and signalling in kidney cancer

    A J Schrader;O Lechner;M Templin;K E J Dittmar

  • De Novo Donor‐Specific Antibody at the Time of Kidney Transplant Biopsy Associates with Microvascular Pathology and Late Graft Failure

    L. G. Hidalgo;P. M. Campbell;B. Sis;G. Einecke

  • Safety and adequacy of renal transplant protocol biopsies.

    Anke Schwarz;Wilfried Gwinner;Markus Hiss;Joerg Radermacher

  • Incidence of polyomavirus‐nephropathy in renal allografts: influence of modern immunosuppressive drugs

    Michael Mengel;Magali Marwedel;Jörg Radermacher;Gabriele Eden

  • Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in human kidney transplants.

    J. Sellarés;J. Reeve;A. Loupy;M. Mengel

  • Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society Consensus Report on Pathologic Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting of GN

    Sanjeev Sethi;Mark Haas;Glen S. Markowitz;Vivette D. D’Agati

  • Risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy after renal transplantation: A protocol biopsy study

    Anke Schwarz;Michael Mengel;Wilfried Gwinner;Joerg Radermacher

Frequent Co-Authors

Hermann Haller
Hermann Haller Hannover Medical School
Philip F. Halloran
Philip F. Halloran University of Alberta
Hans Kreipe
Hans Kreipe Hannover Medical School
Robert B. Colvin
Robert B. Colvin Harvard University
Mark Haas
Mark Haas Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Lorraine C. Racusen
Lorraine C. Racusen Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Bruce Kaplan
Bruce Kaplan University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Parmjeet Randhawa
Parmjeet Randhawa University of Pittsburgh
Axel Haverich
Axel Haverich Hannover Medical School
Daniel Kim
Daniel Kim Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare careers beyond the traditional MD route, there are several flexible academic pathways. Online nursing and advanced practice degrees now offer accelerated options, reducing both time and costs for qualified students.

If you’re seeking specialization and leadership roles, consider short dnp programs. These doctor of nursing practice degrees are designed to provide advanced training in less time than conventional programs. For those looking for the quickest path, check out the shortest dnp program options to accelerate your journey.

Prospective nurses can explore online lpn programs, which offer a fast entry point into nursing for those starting their careers. These programs provide essential clinical skills and can quickly open doors to employment in various healthcare settings.

For registered nurses aiming to specialize, there are also streamlined online tracks such as bsn to np programs online. These pathways allow you to advance into nurse practitioner roles, including in-demand fields like psychiatric-mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Mengel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles