World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
35945
World Ranking
13920
National Ranking
7065

Parmjeet Randhawa publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Parmjeet Randhawa sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 328 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Parmjeet Randhawa D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Parmjeet Randhawa sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Parmjeet Randhawa is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on transplantation and related immunological and nephrological studies.

The scientist's work extensively covers subfields including:

  • Transplantation
  • Surgery
  • Immunology
  • Nephrology
  • Epidemiology

The main research topics addressed by Randhawa include:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

Randhawa's publication record features contributions to several prominent journals with a frequent presence in:

  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Kidney International
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Clinical Transplantation
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Randhawa include:

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation
  • The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics, 2023, American Journal of Transplantation
  • The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation, 2024, Transplantation
  • Consensus Definitions of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection and Disease in Transplant Patients Including Resistant and Refractory CMV for Use in Clinical Trials: 2024 Update From the Transplant Associated Virus Infections Forum, 2024, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Coordinated Circulating T Follicular Helper and Activated B Cell Responses Underlie the Onset of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Throughout their career, Randhawa has frequently collaborated with other researchers, notably:

  • Carmen Lefaucheur
  • Adriana Zeevi
  • Maarten Naesens
  • Alexandre Loupy
  • Anthony J. Demetris

Best Publications

  • The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Kim Solez;Robert B. Colvin;Stephen M. Bonsib

  • Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;M. Haas

  • Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN').

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;B. Sis

  • Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions

    M. Haas;B. Sis;L. C. Racusen;K. Solez

  • Antibody-mediated rejection criteria - an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft rejection.

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Robert B. Colvin;Kim Solez;Michael J. Mihatsch

  • Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation: Interdisciplinary Analyses and Recommendations

    Hans H. Hirsch;Daniel C. Brennan;Cinthia B. Drachenberg;Fabrizio Ginevri

  • Banff Schema for Grading Liver Allograft Rejection: An International Consensus Document

    Anthony J. Demetris;Kenneth P. Batts;Amar P. Dhillon;Linda Ferrell

  • The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials

    M. Haas;A. Loupy;C. Lefaucheur;C. Roufosse

  • Banff '09 meeting report: Antibody mediated graft deterioration and implementation of Banff working groups

    B. Sis;M. Mengel;M. Haas;R. B. Colvin

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection

    Alexandre Loupy;Mark Haas;Candice Roufosse;Maarten Naesens

  • The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology.

    A. Loupy;M. Haas;K. Solez;L. Racusen

  • Update of the International Banff Schema for Liver Allograft Rejection: working recommendations for the histopathologic staging and reporting of chronic rejection. An International Panel.

    Anthony Demetris;David Adams;Chris Bellamy;Karin Blakolmer

  • Human polyoma virus-associated interstitial nephritis in the allograft kidney

    Parmjeet S. Randhawa;Sydney Finkelstein;Velma Scantlebury;Ron Shapiro

  • 2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

    A J Demetris;C Bellamy;S G Hübscher;J O'Leary

  • BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation.

    H. H. Hirsch;P. Randhawa

  • Tolerogenic immunosuppression for organ transplantation.

    Thomas E Starzl;Noriko Murase;Kareem Abu-Elmagd;Edward A Gray

  • EXPERIENCE WITH LIVER AND KIDNEY ALLOGRAFTS FROM NON-HEART-BEATING DONORS

    Adrian Casavilla;Carlo Ramirez;Ron Shapiro;Dai Nghiem

  • BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice.

    Hans H Hirsch;Hans H Hirsch;Parmjeet S Randhawa

  • The histopathological changes associated with allograft rejection and drug toxicity in renal transplant recipients maintained on FK506. Clinical significance and comparison with cyclosporine.

    P S Randhawa;R Shapiro;M L Jordan;T E Starzl

  • Quantitative viral load monitoring and cidofovir therapy for the management of BK virus-associated nephropathy in children and adults.

    Abhay Vats;Ron Shapiro;Parmjeet Singh Randhawa;Velma Scantlebury

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron Shapiro
Ron Shapiro Mount Sinai Hospital
Anthony J. Demetris
Anthony J. Demetris University of Pittsburgh
Adriana Zeevi
Adriana Zeevi University of Pittsburgh
John J. Fung
John J. Fung University of Chicago
Thomas E. Starzl
Thomas E. Starzl University of Pittsburgh
Michael A. Nalesnik
Michael A. Nalesnik University of Pittsburgh
Hans H. Hirsch
Hans H. Hirsch University Hospital of Basel
Tong Wu
Tong Wu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Robert B. Colvin
Robert B. Colvin Harvard University
Michael Mengel
Michael Mengel University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering healthcare careers beyond a traditional MD, there are many flexible online degree options available. Direct MSN programs online can provide a fast track for those who hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree and wish to enter advanced nursing roles. These programs streamline the path to becoming a nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist, often in as little as two to three years.

If you’re looking for the most accessible routes into nursing, explore the easiest nursing programs to get into. These programs typically offer more flexible admissions requirements and may be ideal for students eager to start their nursing education without lengthy prerequisites or highly competitive selection processes.

Beyond patient care roles, healthcare administration is another growing field. Accredited online medical billing and coding programs offer specialized curriculum for those interested in the business side of medicine. Many of the accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid make entering this career path more affordable and accessible.

For current LPNs seeking career advancement, there are also LPN to RN programs without TEAS test requirements. These programs bypass common entrance exams, helping nurses bridge into higher-paying RN roles more efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Parmjeet Randhawa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles