World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark D. Stegall

Mark D. Stegall

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
31964
World Ranking
8675
National Ranking
4473

Mark D. Stegall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Stegall sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 445 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark D. Stegall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Stegall sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Stegall is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Medicine with a focus on transplantation. Their work includes research in transplant surgery, immunology, and related fields, contributing substantially to the knowledge base in renal and organ transplantation.

Their research spans several subfields including:

  • Transplantation
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Immunology

Marked topics of study in their publications cover:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

Among the recent papers associated with Mark D. Stegall are:

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation
  • American Society of Transplant Surgeons recommendations on best practices in donation after circulatory death organ procurement, 2023, American Journal of Transplantation
  • Implication of TIGIT+ human memory B cells in immune regulation, 2021, Nature Communications
  • The Use of GLP1R Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Kidney Transplant Recipients, 2020, Transplantation Direct
  • Trajectories of glomerular filtration rate and progression to end stage kidney disease after kidney transplantation, 2020, Kidney International

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative research include:

  • Byron H. Smith
  • Walter D. Park
  • Carrie A. Schinstock
  • Aleksandra Kukla
  • Andrew Bentall

Their research has appeared in a variety of publication venues, with multiple contributions particularly in:

  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Transplantation
  • Clinical Transplantation
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for primary dysfunction after liver transplantation--a multivariate analysis.

    Rutger Ploeg;Anthony D'alessandro;Stuart Knechtle;Mark Stegall

  • The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials

    M. Haas;A. Loupy;C. Lefaucheur;C. Roufosse

  • Identifying Specific Causes of Kidney Allograft Loss

    Z. M. El-Zoghby;M. D. Stegall;D. J. Lager;W. K. Kremers

  • Terminal complement inhibition decreases antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized renal transplant recipients.

    M. D. Stegall;T. Diwan;S. Raghavaiah;L. D. Cornell

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection

    Alexandre Loupy;Mark Haas;Candice Roufosse;Maarten Naesens

  • The Association Between Age and Nephrosclerosis on Renal Biopsy Among Healthy Adults

    Andrew D. Rule;Hatem Amer;Lynn D. Cornell;Sandra J. Taler

  • A Comparison of Plasmapheresis Versus High-Dose IVIG Desensitization in Renal Allograft Recipients with High Levels of Donor Specific Alloantibody

    M.D. Stegall;J. Gloor;J.L. Winters;S.B. Moore

  • Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors.

    Andrew D Rule;Hiie M Gussak;Gregory R Pond;Erik J Bergstralh

  • New onset hyperglycemia and diabetes are associated with increased cardiovascular risk after kidney transplantation

    Fernando G. Cosio;Yogish Kudva;Marije van der Velde;Timothy S. Larson

  • Proteasome inhibition causes apoptosis of normal human plasma cells preventing alloantibody production.

    D. K. Perry;J. M. Burns;H. S. Pollinger;B. P. Amiot

  • Transplant Glomerulopathy: Subclinical Incidence and Association with Alloantibody

    J. M. Gloor;S. Sethi;M. D. Stegall;W. D. Park

  • Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation.

    Christopher Johnson;Nasimul Ahsan;Thomas Gonwa;Philip Halloran

  • Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus.

    Patrick G. Dean;William J. Lund;Timothy S. Larson;Mikel Prieto

  • Survival Benefit with Kidney Transplants from HLA-Incompatible Live Donors

    B. J. Orandi;X. Luo;A. B. Massie;J. M. Garonzik-Wang

  • Predicting subsequent decline in kidney allograft function from early surveillance biopsies.

    Fernando G. Cosio;Joseph P. Grande;Hani Wadei;Timothy S. Larson

  • Transplant Glomerulopathy

    F. G. Cosio;J. M. Gloor;S. Sethi;M. D. Stegall

  • Determinants of Discard of Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys: Impact of Biopsy and Machine Perfusion

    R. S. Sung;Laura L. Christensen;Alan B. Leichtman;S. M. Greenstein

  • Complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: a randomized trial comparing sirolimus and tacrolimus.

    T. S. Larson;P. G. Dean;M. D. Stegall;M. D. Griffin

  • Overcoming a Positive Crossmatch in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

    James M. Gloor;Steven R. DeGoey;Alvaro A. Pineda;S. Breanndan Moore

  • Alloantibody levels and acute humoral rejection early after positive crossmatch kidney transplantation.

    J. M. Burns;L. D. Cornell;D. K. Perry;H. S. Pollinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph P. Grande
Joseph P. Grande Mayo Clinic
Dorry L. Segev
Dorry L. Segev Johns Hopkins University
Robert A. Montgomery
Robert A. Montgomery New York University
Stuart J. Knechtle
Stuart J. Knechtle Duke University
Nelson Leung
Nelson Leung Mayo Clinic
Philip F. Halloran
Philip F. Halloran University of Alberta
Stanley C. Jordan
Stanley C. Jordan Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn't always require a traditional path. Many students and professionals now look for flexible, accelerated programs that can fast-track their journey. One popular option is the accelerated dnp programs, which allow nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time without sacrificing quality.

If you’re seeking an easier entry point into advanced nursing, researching the easiest dnp program reddit discussions can provide genuine insights into student experiences and program demands. These online communities help prospective students find the best match for their needs and abilities.

For those starting their nursing journey, the lpn fast track program is designed to quickly launch your healthcare career as a Licensed Practical Nurse, a critical stepping-stone to more advanced roles.

Mental health is another growing field. The fastest psych np program provides a streamlined path to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, responding to rising mental health needs across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Stegall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles