World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Nickerson

Peter Nickerson

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
24899
World Ranking
18339
National Ranking
775

Peter Nickerson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Nickerson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 264 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Nickerson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Nickerson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Nickerson is affiliated with the University of Manitoba in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with an emphasis on transplantation and related clinical fields.

Their scientific contributions are concentrated across several subfields of study, including:

  • Transplantation
  • Surgery
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Immunology

Nickerson has been involved in research covering major topics such as:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The scholar's work has appeared frequently in several publication venues, including:

  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Transplantation
  • Human Immunology
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Notable recent papers authored by or associated with this researcher include:

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection (2020, American Journal of Transplantation)
  • PIRs mediate innate myeloid cell memory to nonself MHC molecules (2020, Science)
  • Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 Working Group Meeting Report (2020, American Journal of Transplantation)
  • Significance of HLA-DQ in kidney transplantation: time to reevaluate human leukocyte antigen-matching priorities to improve transplant outcomes? An expert review and recommendations (2021, Kidney International)
  • The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era (2021, American Journal of Transplantation)

Peter Nickerson has collaborated extensively with a recurring network of co-authors, including:

  • Chris Wiebe
  • Julie Ho
  • Ian W. Gibson
  • David N. Rush
  • Martin Karpinski

Best Publications

  • The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Kim Solez;Robert B. Colvin;Stephen M. Bonsib

  • The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials

    M. Haas;A. Loupy;C. Lefaucheur;C. Roufosse

  • Evolution and Clinical Pathologic Correlations of De Novo Donor‐Specific HLA Antibody Post Kidney Transplant

    C. Wiebe;I. W. Gibson;T. D. Blydt-Hansen;M. Karpinski

  • Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation.

    Brian D. Tait;Caner Süsal;Howard M. Gebel;Peter W. Nickerson

  • The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection

    Alexandre Loupy;Mark Haas;Candice Roufosse;Maarten Naesens

  • Beneficial effects of treatment of early subclinical rejection: a randomized study.

    D Rush;P Nickerson;J Gough;R McKenna

  • Pre-transplant assessment of donor-reactive, HLA-specific antibodies in renal transplantation: contraindication vs. risk.

    Howard M. Gebel;Robert A. Bray;Peter Nickerson

  • Urine protein profiling with surface-enhanced laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

    Stefan Schaub;John Wilkins;Tracey Weiler;Kevin Sangster

  • National conference to assess antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation.

    Steven K. Takemoto;Adriana Zeevi;Sandy Feng;Robert B. Colvin

  • Sleep apnoea patients have more automobile accidents.

    C.F. George;P.W. Nickerson;P.J. Hanly;T.W. Millar

  • Administration of noncytolytic IL-10/Fc in murine models of lipopolysaccharide-induced septic shock and allogeneic islet transplantation

    X X Zheng;A W Steele;P W Nickerson;W Steurer

  • Rates and Determinants of Progression to Graft Failure in Kidney Allograft Recipients With De Novo Donor‐Specific Antibody

    C. Wiebe;I. W. Gibson;T. D. Blydt-Hansen;D. Pochinco

  • Proteomic-Based Detection of Urine Proteins Associated with Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

    Stefan Schaub;David Rush;John Wilkins;Ian W. Gibson

  • Class II HLA epitope matching-A strategy to minimize de novo donor-specific antibody development and improve outcomes.

    C. Wiebe;D. Pochinco;T. D. Blydt-Hansen;J. Ho

  • Cytokines and the Th1/Th2 paradigm in transplantation

    Peter Nickerson;Wolfgang Steurer;Jürg Steiger;Xinxiao Zheng

  • Neointimal and tubulointerstitial infiltration by recipient mesenchymal cells in chronic renal-allograft rejection

    Paul C. Grimm;Peter Nickerson;John Jeffery;Rashmin C. Savani

  • The Th1/Th2 paradigm and the allograft response

    T. B. Strom;P. Roy-Chaudhury;R. Manfro;Xin Xiao Zheng

  • Multicenter validation of urinary CXCL9 as a risk-stratifying biomarker for kidney transplant injury.

    Donald E Hricik;P. Nickerson;R. N. Formica;Emilio Poggio

  • Flow Cytometric Crossmatching in Primary Renal Transplant Recipients with a Negative Anti-Human Globulin Enhanced Cytotoxicity Crossmatch

    Martin Karpinski;David Rush;John Jeffery;Markus Exner

  • Proteomic-based identification of cleaved urinary beta2-microglobulin as a potential marker for acute tubular injury in renal allografts.

    Stefan Schaub;John A. Wilkins;Mihaela Antonovici;Oleg Krokhin

Frequent Co-Authors

Terry B. Strom
Terry B. Strom Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Howard M. Gebel
Howard M. Gebel Emory University
Peter S. Heeger
Peter S. Heeger Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Xin Xiao Zheng
Xin Xiao Zheng University of Pittsburgh
Elaine F. Reed
Elaine F. Reed University of California, Los Angeles
Adriana Zeevi
Adriana Zeevi University of Pittsburgh
David S. Wishart
David S. Wishart University of Alberta
Robert L. Fairchild
Robert L. Fairchild Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
Robert B. Colvin
Robert B. Colvin Harvard University
Michael Mengel
Michael Mengel University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for healthcare professionals grows, many students are exploring alternative pathways and related degrees that can lead to rewarding careers outside or alongside a traditional MD. Online education has made it easier than ever to advance or pivot your healthcare career with flexibility and reduced costs.

For those interested in advanced practice nursing, consider exploring the most affordable online dnp programs, which prepare nurses for leadership and high-level clinical roles. If pharmacy is your area of passion, online pharmacist programs can offer comprehensive paths to licensure and expertise.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. With the rise of digital health records, there is a growing need for skilled professionals in health information management. Many choose online schools for health information management to enter this evolving field. Additionally, those interested in the administrative side of healthcare can start their journey with medical billing and coding classes online.

These online options offer flexible, affordable, and accredited avenues to begin or advance your healthcare career, providing excellent alternatives and complements to medical study in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Nickerson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles