World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 58 1638 1468 23 22 308 15277

Mark Bray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Bray between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Bray published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2020. 4 of the 320 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2020. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 4 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications
1980 2024

320 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Bray: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 1
1982 4
1983 2
1984 5
1985 9
1986 8
1987 9
1988 9
1989 5
1990 7
1991 9
1992 6
1993 5
1994 9
1995 3
1996 8
1997 3
1998 9
1999 5
2000 5
2001 6
2002 3
2003 9
2004 5
2005 14
2006 5
2007 11
2008 5
2009 5
2010 10
2011 11
2012 8
2013 10
2014 13
2015 14
2016 13
2017 7
2018 9
2019 9
2020 15
2021 8
2022 3
2023 2
2024 2
Total 320
Download as CSV

Mark Bray publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 304–313 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 308 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95 308
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Bray D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95 58
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Bray is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China and conducts research primarily in the field of Social Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Public Administration, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience, and General Health Professions.

The main topics addressed in their research include labor movements and unions, international labor and employment law, global trade, sustainability and social impact, employment and welfare studies, regulation and compliance studies, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, as well as trauma and emergency care studies.

Mark Bray has contributed several papers to academic literature, with recent publications focusing mostly on labor and industrial relations. These include:

  • "Why doesn't anyone talk about non-union collective agreements?" (2020, Journal of Industrial Relations)
  • "Unions and collective bargaining in Australia in 2020" (2021, Journal of Industrial Relations)
  • "Unions and collective bargaining in Australia in 2019" (2020, Journal of Industrial Relations)

Though these are the papers where Mark Bray is the sole author, the broader data set contains other relevant publications in related fields, such as evaluations of surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic published in Surgery Open Science, and studies in ergonomics. However, these publications were authored by other researchers.

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Mark Bray include Johanna Macneil, Leslee Spiess, Shae McCrystal, Thomas Minto, and Tarig Abdelrahman. Johanna Macneil stands out as the most frequent collaborator, with four joint publications.

Mark Bray's work is regularly published in the following academic venues:

  • Journal of Industrial Relations
  • Surgery Open Science
  • Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
  • Industrial Relations Journal
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

Best Publications

  • The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and Its Implications for Planners

    Mark Bray

  • Cross-border flows of students for higher education: Push-pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau

    Mei Li;Mark Bray

  • Levels of Comparison in Educational Studies: Different Insights from Different Literatures and the Value of Multilevel Analyses

    Mark Bray;R. Murray Thomas

  • Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring: Conceptual Considerations, and Socio-Economic Patterns in Hong Kong.

    Mark Bray;Percy Kwok

  • Shadow Education: Private Supplementary Tutoring and Its Implications for Policy Makers in Asia

    Mark Bray;Chad Lykins

  • Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods

    Mark Bray;Bob Adamson;Mark Mason

  • Private Supplementary Tutoring: Comparative Perspectives on Patterns and Implications

    Mark Bray

  • Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring : Dimensions, implications and government responses

    Mark Bray

  • Confronting the Shadow Education System: What government policies for what private tutoring?

    Mark Bray;Iiep Policy Forum

  • Decentralization of Education: Community Financing

    Mark Bray

  • Counting the Full Cost: Parental and Community Financing of Education in East Asia

    Mark Bray

  • Education and Society in Africa

    David Stephens;Peter B. Clarke;Mark Bray

  • Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions

    Mark Bray

  • The Effect of Strategic Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of High‐Performance Human Resource Practices

    Rebecca Mitchell;Shatha Obeidat;Mark Bray

  • Education in small states : concepts, challenges, and strategies

    Mark Bray;Steve Packer

  • Benefits and Tensions of Shadow Education: Comparative Perspectives on the Roles and Impact of Private Supplementary Tutoring in the Lives of Hong Kong Students: (doi: 10.14425/00.45.72)

    Mark Bray

  • Schooling and Its Supplements: Changing Global Patterns and Implications for Comparative Education

    Mark Bray

  • The link between high performance work practices and organizational performance

    Shatha M. Obeidat;Rebecca Mitchell;Mark Bray

  • Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education

    Mark Bray;Shengli Zhan;Chad Lykins;Dan Wang

  • Education for development: an analysis of investment choices: George Psacharopoulos and Maureen Woodhall. Oxford University Press, New York, 1985, 338pp

    Mark Bray

  • LEVELS OF COMPARISON IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES:DIFFERENT INSIGHTS FROM DIFFERENT LITERATURES AND THE VALUE OF MULTILEVEL ANALYSES

    Mark Bray;R Murray Thomas;Wu Wenjun

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W Crossley
Michael W Crossley University of Bristol
Bob Adamson
Bob Adamson University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Brendan S. Weekes
Brendan S. Weekes University of Hong Kong
Nirmala Rao
Nirmala Rao University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities opens up diverse career opportunities in fields like education, psychology, research, and public service. Today, a growing number of students are choosing flexible, online formats to earn their degrees and get ahead in these fields.

For those interested in a fast route, accelerated online degrees make it possible to complete your undergraduate studies at an advanced pace. If you’re looking to specialize quickly after your bachelor’s, one year masters programs online can provide intensive, focused learning that allows you to launch your career sooner.

Students interested in psychology can benefit from the best online masters in psychology to develop their expertise without putting their life on hold. Meanwhile, educators aiming for leadership roles can consider 2 year ed d programs online to earn a doctoral degree more efficiently.

These online programs not only offer flexibility but also combine quality with speed and affordability, allowing you to shape a meaningful career in social sciences and humanities while balancing work and other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Bray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles