World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
58
Citations
15277
World Ranking
1638
National Ranking
23

Mark Bray publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bray sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 308 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark Bray D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bray sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Bray is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China and conducts research primarily in the field of Social Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Public Administration, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience, and General Health Professions.

The main topics addressed in their research include labor movements and unions, international labor and employment law, global trade, sustainability and social impact, employment and welfare studies, regulation and compliance studies, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, as well as trauma and emergency care studies.

Mark Bray has contributed several papers to academic literature, with recent publications focusing mostly on labor and industrial relations. These include:

  • "Why doesn't anyone talk about non-union collective agreements?" (2020, Journal of Industrial Relations)
  • "Unions and collective bargaining in Australia in 2020" (2021, Journal of Industrial Relations)
  • "Unions and collective bargaining in Australia in 2019" (2020, Journal of Industrial Relations)

Though these are the papers where Mark Bray is the sole author, the broader data set contains other relevant publications in related fields, such as evaluations of surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic published in Surgery Open Science, and studies in ergonomics. However, these publications were authored by other researchers.

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Mark Bray include Johanna Macneil, Leslee Spiess, Shae McCrystal, Thomas Minto, and Tarig Abdelrahman. Johanna Macneil stands out as the most frequent collaborator, with four joint publications.

Mark Bray's work is regularly published in the following academic venues:

  • Journal of Industrial Relations
  • Surgery Open Science
  • Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
  • Industrial Relations Journal
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

Best Publications

  • The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and Its Implications for Planners

    Mark Bray

  • Cross-border flows of students for higher education: Push-pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau

    Mei Li;Mark Bray

  • Levels of Comparison in Educational Studies: Different Insights from Different Literatures and the Value of Multilevel Analyses

    Mark Bray;R. Murray Thomas

  • Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring: Conceptual Considerations, and Socio-Economic Patterns in Hong Kong.

    Mark Bray;Percy Kwok

  • Shadow Education: Private Supplementary Tutoring and Its Implications for Policy Makers in Asia

    Mark Bray;Chad Lykins

  • Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods

    Mark Bray;Bob Adamson;Mark Mason

  • Private Supplementary Tutoring: Comparative Perspectives on Patterns and Implications

    Mark Bray

  • Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring : Dimensions, implications and government responses

    Mark Bray

  • Confronting the Shadow Education System: What government policies for what private tutoring?

    Mark Bray;Iiep Policy Forum

  • Decentralization of Education: Community Financing

    Mark Bray

  • Counting the Full Cost: Parental and Community Financing of Education in East Asia

    Mark Bray

  • Education and Society in Africa

    David Stephens;Peter B. Clarke;Mark Bray

  • Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions

    Mark Bray

  • The Effect of Strategic Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of High‐Performance Human Resource Practices

    Rebecca Mitchell;Shatha Obeidat;Mark Bray

  • Education in small states : concepts, challenges, and strategies

    Mark Bray;Steve Packer

  • Comparative research on shadow education: Achievements, challenges, and the agenda ahead

    Wei Zhang;Mark Bray;Mark Bray

  • Benefits and Tensions of Shadow Education: Comparative Perspectives on the Roles and Impact of Private Supplementary Tutoring in the Lives of Hong Kong Students: (doi: 10.14425/00.45.72)

    Mark Bray

  • Schooling and Its Supplements: Changing Global Patterns and Implications for Comparative Education

    Mark Bray

  • The link between high performance work practices and organizational performance

    Shatha M. Obeidat;Rebecca Mitchell;Mark Bray

  • Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education

    Mark Bray;Shengli Zhan;Chad Lykins;Dan Wang

  • Shadow Education in Europe: Growing Prevalence, Underlying Forces, and Policy Implications:

    Mark Bray

  • Education for development: an analysis of investment choices: George Psacharopoulos and Maureen Woodhall. Oxford University Press, New York, 1985, 338pp

    Mark Bray

  • LEVELS OF COMPARISON IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES:DIFFERENT INSIGHTS FROM DIFFERENT LITERATURES AND THE VALUE OF MULTILEVEL ANALYSES

    Mark Bray;R Murray Thomas;Wu Wenjun

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W Crossley
Michael W Crossley University of Bristol
Bob Adamson
Bob Adamson University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Brendan S. Weekes
Brendan S. Weekes University of Hong Kong
Nirmala Rao
Nirmala Rao University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities opens up diverse career opportunities in fields like education, psychology, research, and public service. Today, a growing number of students are choosing flexible, online formats to earn their degrees and get ahead in these fields.

For those interested in a fast route, accelerated online degrees make it possible to complete your undergraduate studies at an advanced pace. If you’re looking to specialize quickly after your bachelor’s, one year masters programs online can provide intensive, focused learning that allows you to launch your career sooner.

Students interested in psychology can benefit from the best online masters in psychology to develop their expertise without putting their life on hold. Meanwhile, educators aiming for leadership roles can consider 2 year ed d programs online to earn a doctoral degree more efficiently.

These online programs not only offer flexibility but also combine quality with speed and affordability, allowing you to shape a meaningful career in social sciences and humanities while balancing work and other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Bray

Trending Scientists