World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8385 7830 4473 4072 81 13072

Frank R. Vellutino publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frank R. Vellutino between 1963 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frank R. Vellutino published across 59 years, from 1963 to 2021, averaging 1.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1975. 1 of the 81 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1975. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 5 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1963 2021

81 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frank R. Vellutino: publications per year, 1963 to 2021
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 2
1972 3
1973 2
1974 1
1975 5
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 3
1980 1
1981 1
1982 3
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 0
2010 2
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 81
Download as CSV

Frank R. Vellutino publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank R. Vellutino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 81
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Frank R. Vellutino D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank R. Vellutino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frank R. Vellutino is affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York in the United States. Their professional focus and contributions are situated within this academic institution.

Information about recent papers authored by Vellutino, including titles, years of publication, and venues, is not available.

No frequent co-authors have been identified in the available data.

There are no listed frequent publication venues associated with Vellutino.

Details concerning book publications or publishers with which Vellutino may be associated are not provided.

Data on main fields of study or subfields of research relevant to their work is not present.

There is no information regarding specific research topics or areas that might characterize Vellutino's scientific work.

Records do not indicate awards or distinctions earned by Vellutino.

The data confirms that Frank R. Vellutino is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?

    Frank R. Vellutino;Jack M. Fletcher;Margaret J. Snowling;Donna M. Scanlon

  • Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability

    Frank R. Vellutino;Donna M. Scanlon;Edward R. Sipay;Sheila G. Small

  • Dyslexia: Theory and Research

    Frank R. Vellutino

  • Components of Reading Ability: Multivariate Evidence for a Convergent Skills Model of Reading Development

    Frank R. Vellutino;William E. Tunmer;James J. Jaccard;RuSan Chen

  • Phonological Coding, Phonological Awareness, and Reading Ability: Evidence from a Longitudinal and Experimental Study.

    Frank R. Vellutino;Donna M. Scanlon

  • Differentiating Between Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers More Evidence Against the IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Definition of Reading Disability

    F R Vellutino;D M Scanlon;G R Lyon

  • Response to Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing Between Children With and Without Reading Disabilities Evidence for the Role of Kindergarten and First-Grade Interventions

    Frank R. Vellutino;Donna M. Scanlon;Sheila Small;Diane P. Fanuele

  • Alternative Conceptualizations of Dyslexia: Evidence in Support of a Verbal-Deficit Hypothesis

    Frank R. Vellutino

  • Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers.

    Frank R. Vellutino;Donna M. Scanlon;Debra Spearing

  • Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition : convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction

    Frank R. Vellutino

  • Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding.

    Frank R. Vellutino;Donna M. Scanlon;Melinda S. Tanzman

  • Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties

    Frank R. Vellutino;Donna M. Scanlon;Haiyan Zhang;Christopher Schatschneider

  • Prerequisite skills, early instruction, and success in first-grade reading: Selected results from a longitudinal study

    Donna M. Scanlon;Frank R. Vellutino

  • Severe Reading Difficulties—Can They Be Prevented? A Comparison of Prevention and Intervention Approaches

    Donna M. Scanlon;Frank R. Vellutino;Sheila G. Small;Diane P. Fanuele

  • Prediction of Reading Ability: A Cross-Validation Study of the Simple View of Reading

    Ru San Chen;Frank R. Vellutino

  • Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional Development for classroom teachers versus direct interventions for children

    Donna M. Scanlon;Lynn M. Gelzheiser;Frank R. Vellutino;Christopher Schatschneider

  • Verbal vs non-verbal paired-associates learning in poor and normal readers

    Frank R Vellutino;Joseph A Steger;Constance J Harding;Forman Phillips

  • Reading disability: an investigation of the perceptual deficit hypothesis.

    Frank R. Vellutino;Joseph A. Steger;Gillray Kandel

  • A Comparison of the Instructional Backgrounds and Cognitive Profiles of Poor, Average, and Good Readers Who Were Initially Identified as At Risk for Reading Failure.

    Donna M. Scanlon;Frank R. Vellutino

  • The Interactive Strategies approach to reading intervention

    Frank R Vellutino;Donna M Scanlon

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha B. Denckla
Martha B. Denckla Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Christopher Schatschneider
Christopher Schatschneider Florida State University
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco University of Minnesota
Margaret J. Snowling
Margaret J. Snowling University of Oxford
Harvey S. Singer
Harvey S. Singer Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
William E. Tunmer
William E. Tunmer Massey University
Asher Koriat
Asher Koriat University of Haifa
James Jaccard
James Jaccard New York University
Frank M. Gresham
Frank M. Gresham Louisiana State University
Allan L. Reiss
Allan L. Reiss Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of psychology opens doors to many related online degrees and dynamic career paths. Many students pursue counseling, a growing discipline that offers the chance to positively impact mental health and well-being in communities. Accredited online counseling programs are available across the country, enabling flexibility for working professionals or those with busy schedules.

If you’re considering a career in counseling, it’s helpful to compare best counseling program rankings in the Midwest to get a sense of program strengths and reputations. For students seeking region-specific opportunities, there are also rankings for best counseling degree programs in Minnesota, best counseling program rankings in Mississippi, and best counseling degree programs in Nashville. These resources can guide you in selecting programs with the best fit and outcomes.

With the right degree, you can pursue roles as a licensed professional counselor, school counselor, substance abuse counselor, or college advisor. Online degrees in psychology and counseling provide the foundation for these fulfilling and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Frank R. Vellutino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles