World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
22117
World Ranking
2913
National Ranking
18

Asher Koriat publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asher Koriat sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Asher Koriat D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asher Koriat sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Asher Koriat is affiliated with the University of Haifa in Israel and has contributed to research primarily within the field of psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, history and philosophy of science, and applied psychology.

Their research interests cover a range of topics such as social and intergroup psychology, epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, philosophy and history of science, behavioral health and interventions, personality traits and psychology, and opinion dynamics and social influence.

Koriat has published in the following venues:

  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Social Cognition

Recent papers by Koriat include:

  • "Subjective Confidence as a Monitor of the Replicability of the Response," 2024, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Subjective Confidence in the Response to Personality Questions: Some Insight Into the Construction of People's Responses to Test Items," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The Effects of Group Conformity on the Prototypical Majority Effect for Confidence and Response Latency," 2020, Social Cognition

Throughout their research career, Koriat has collaborated with several co-authors including Monika Undorf, Norbert Schwarz, and Eryn J. Newman.

Best Publications

  • Reasons for confidence.

    Asher Koriat;Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff

  • Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning

    Asher Koriat

  • Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy

    Asher Koriat;Morris Goldsmith

  • How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

    Asher Koriat

  • Toward a psychology of memory accuracy.

    Asher Koriat;Morris Goldsmith;Ainat Pansky

  • Metacognition and consciousness.

    Asher Koriat

  • The feeling of knowing: some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control.

    Asher Koriat

  • Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application.

    Daniel Gopher;Asher Koriat

  • The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.

    Asher Koriat;Hilit Ma'ayan;Ravit Nussinson

  • Illusions of Competence in Monitoring One's Knowledge During Study.

    Asher Koriat;Robert A. Bjork

  • Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes.

    Asher Koriat;Robert A. Bjork;Limor Sheffer;Sarah K. Bar

  • The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing.

    Asher Koriat;Ravit Levy-Sadot

  • Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment.

    Asher Koriat;Morris Goldsmith

  • DISSOCIATING KNOWING AND THE FEELING OF KNOWING: FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR THE ACCESSIBILITY MODEL

    Asher Koriat

  • Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.

    Asher Koriat;Limor Sheffer;Hilit Ma'ayan

  • The self-consistency model of subjective confidence.

    Asher Koriat

  • Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory

    Asher Koriat;Morris Goldsmith

  • The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning

    Asher Koriat;Hilit Ma’ayan

  • Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge.

    Asher Koriat;Ravit Levy-Sadot

  • Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting.

    Morris Goldsmith;Asher Koriat;Amit Weinberg-Eliezer

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Bjork
Robert A. Bjork University of California, Los Angeles
Wolfgang Schneider
Wolfgang Schneider University of Würzburg
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Hasida Ben-Zur
Hasida Ben-Zur University of Haifa
James R. Averill
James R. Averill University of Massachusetts Amherst
Baruch Fischhoff
Baruch Fischhoff Carnegie Mellon University
Tor Endestad
Tor Endestad University of Oslo
Herbert Bless
Herbert Bless University of Mannheim
Svein Magnussen
Svein Magnussen University of Oslo
Richard S. Lazarus
Richard S. Lazarus University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens many doors to related online degrees and career opportunities. Popular pathways include counseling, clinical psychology, school psychology, and mental health services. Many institutions offer online degrees, making education more accessible for students balancing work, family, or other commitments.

For those seeking top-tier programs, there are extensive resources that rank and review degree offerings in various locations. You can explore the best counseling program rankings in Texas or view detailed analyses of the best college counseling programs in Washington. If you're interested in possibilities in the capital, consider the best college counseling programs in Washington, D.C..

For those looking beyond regional options, resources like West counseling degree programs highlight leading schools and online offerings across the western United States. These guides help prospective students compare specializations, program delivery formats, and career outcomes to choose the best fit for their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Asher Koriat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles