World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
24448
World Ranking
2553
National Ranking
1477

Janet Metcalfe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Metcalfe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janet Metcalfe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Metcalfe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janet Metcalfe is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with particular emphasis on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Psychology.

Their work explores several main topics, including:

  • Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Janet Metcalfe has published frequently in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Metacognition and Learning, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Experimental Psychology General, and Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. Notable recent papers include:

  • The MAPS model of self-regulation: Integrating metacognition, agency, and possible selves, 2021, Metacognition and Learning
  • Epistemic curiosity and the region of proximal learning, 2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Curiosity: The effects of feedback and confidence on the desire to know., 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Measures of relative metacognitive accuracy are confounded with task performance in tasks that permit guessing, 2021, Metacognition and Learning
  • Curiosity and the desire for agency: wait, wait... don't tell me!, 2021, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Their frequent collaborators include Matti Vuorre, Brian Cahill, Bennett L. Schwartz, Gábor Kismihók, and Teal S. Eich, with counts of multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • A Hot/Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower.

    Janet Metcalfe;Walter Mischel

  • Metacognition : knowing about knowing

    Janet Metcalfe;Arthur Paul Shimamura

  • Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving.

    Janet Metcalfe;David Wiebe

  • Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007-2004.

    Harold Pashler;Patrice M. Bain;Brian A. Bottge;Arthur Graesser

  • Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.

    Lisa K. Son;Janet Metcalfe

  • Neural systems and cue-induced cocaine craving.

    Katherine R Bonson;Steven J Grant;Carlo S Contoreggi;Jonathan M Links

  • Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving.

    Janet Metcalfe

  • Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.

    Janet Metcalfe;Bridgid Finn

  • The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition.

    Janet Metcalfe;Bennett L. Schwartz;Scott G. Joaquim

  • Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study

    Janet Metcalfe

  • Mood Dependent Memory for Internal Versus External Events

    Eric Eich;Janet Metcalfe

  • A Region of Proximal Learning model of study time allocation

    Janet Metcalfe;Nate Kornell

  • Learning from Errors.

    Janet Metcalfe

  • From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg;Jessica K. Witt;Janet Metcalfe

  • Premonitions of insight predict impending error.

    Janet Metcalfe

  • Study Efficacy and the Region of Proximal Learning Framework

    Nate Kornell;Janet Metcalfe

  • Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception.

    Li Yan McCurdy;Brian Maniscalco;Janet Metcalfe;Ka Yuet Liu

  • EMPATH: Face, Emotion, and Gender Recognition Using Holons

    Garrison W. Cottrell;Janet Metcalfe

  • Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning

    Janet Metcalfe

  • Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.

    Bennett L. Schwartz;Janet Metcalfe

Frequent Co-Authors

Bennett L. Schwartz
Bennett L. Schwartz Florida International University
Nate Kornell
Nate Kornell Williams College
David Friedman
David Friedman Columbia University
Paul Bloom
Paul Bloom Columbia University
Yaakov Stern
Yaakov Stern Columbia University
Herbert S. Terrace
Herbert S. Terrace Columbia University
Bennet B. Murdock
Bennet B. Murdock University of Toronto
Jason P. Mitchell
Jason P. Mitchell Harvard University
Alan D. Castel
Alan D. Castel University of California, Los Angeles
Peter D. Balsam
Peter D. Balsam Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring advanced education in psychology can open diverse professional doors. If you are interested in behavior analysis, aba masters programs online provide flexible learning options that lead to careers in therapy, counseling, or education. For those who prefer cutting-edge brain research and clinical practice, consider neuropsychology phd programs, which enable a focus on how brain function affects behavior and cognition.

Not all psychology-related careers require long commitments. Some students may prioritize entering the workforce quickly. Programs like the quickest human services online degree allow you to start helping people in supporting roles much sooner, making them a great entry point.

Sports enthusiasts may wish to turn their passion into a career by pursuing a degree in sports psychology. Learn more about what jobs can you get with sports psychology—from working with athletes to corporate wellness coaching. The right online degree can be a stepping stone to a fulfilling and flexible career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Janet Metcalfe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles