World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claudia M. Roebers

Claudia M. Roebers

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
8055
World Ranking
5501
National Ranking
62

Claudia M. Roebers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Roebers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Claudia M. Roebers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Roebers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudia M. Roebers is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a substantial focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. Their work also extends into Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Roebers has contributed to various publication venues with several papers, especially in "Metacognition and Learning" and "PLoS ONE." Other important venues include "Psychology of Sport and Exercise," "British Journal of Developmental Psychology," and "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology."

Among Roebers' recent published papers are:

  • Physical activity and motor skills in children: A differentiated approach (2021), Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • The effect of video games, exergames and board games on executive functions in kindergarten and 2nd grade: An explorative longitudinal study (2021), Trends in Neuroscience and Education
  • Effects of Cognitive Training and Exergaming in Pediatric Cancer Survivors-A Randomized Clinical Trial (2020), Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Connecting teachers' classroom instructions with children's metacognition and learning in elementary school (2020), Metacognition and Learning
  • Self-regulation in Preschool Children: Factor Structure of Different Measures of Effortful Control and Executive Functions (2021), Journal of Cognition and Development

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Roebers include Mariëtte H. van Loon, Valentin Benzing, Valerie Siegwart, Michael A. Grotzer, and Maja Steinlin.

Best Publications

  • Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation

    Claudia M. Roebers

  • Cognitively Engaging Chronic Physical Activity, But Not Aerobic Exercise, Affects Executive Functions in Primary School Children: A Group-Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mirko Schmidt;Katja Jäger;Fabienne Egger;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Marianne Kauer

  • How do different aspects of self-regulation predict successful adaptation to school?

    Regula Neuenschwander;Marianne Röthlisberger;Patrizia Cimeli;Claudia M. Roebers

  • The relation between cognitive and motor performance and their relevance for children's transition to school: a latent variable approach.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Patrizia Cimeli

  • Improving executive functions in 5- and 6-year-olds: Evaluation of a small group intervention in prekindergarten and kindergarten children

    Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Patrizia Cimeli;Eva Michel

  • Developmental Patterns of Eyewitness Responses to Repeated and Increasingly Suggestive Questions

    William S. Cassel;Claudia E.M. Roebers;David F. Bjorklund

  • Confidence judgments in children's and adults' event recall and suggestibility

    Claudia M. Roebers

  • Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: An explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achievement

    Claudia M. Roebers;Patrizia Cimeli;Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander

  • Early metacognitive abilities: The interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5- to 7-year-old children

    Nesrin Destan;Emily Hembacher;Simona Ghetti;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Disentangling the relationship between children's motor ability, executive function and academic achievement

    Mirko Schmidt;Fabienne Egger;Valentin Benzing;Katja Jäger

  • The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults

    Claudia M. Roebers;Wolfgang Schneider

  • Development of Cognitive Skills in Children with Motor Coordination Impairments at 12-Month Follow-up

    Eva Michel;Marianne Roethlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Claudia M Roebers

  • Cognitive and physiological effects of an acute physical activity intervention in elementary school children.

    Katja Jäger;Mirko Schmidt;Achim Conzelmann;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Confidence judgments in event recall: developmental progression in the impact of question format.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Pauline Howie

  • School enrolment and executive functioning: A longitudinal perspective on developmental changes, the influence of learning context, and the prediction of pre-academic skills

    Claudia M. Roebers;Marianne Röthlisberger;Patrizia Cimeli;Eva Michel

  • Physical activity and motor skills in children: A differentiated approach

    Laura C. Dapp;Venera Gashaj;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Exekutive Funktionen: Zugrundeliegende kognitive Prozesse und deren Korrelate bei Kindern im späten Vorschulalter

    Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Eva Michel;Claudia Maria Roebers

  • Metacognitive monitoring and control in elementary school children: Their interrelations and their role for test performance

    Claudia M. Roebers;Saskia S. Krebs;Thomas Roderer

  • Executive functions, visual-motor coordination, physical fitness and academic achievement: Longitudinal relations in typically developing children.

    Nicole Oberer;Venera Gashaj;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.

    Saskia S. Krebs;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Children's metamemorial judgments in an event recall task.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Nicole von der Linden;Wolfgang Schneider;Pauline Howie

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Schneider
Wolfgang Schneider University of Würzburg
Beat Meier
Beat Meier University of Bern
Fred W. Mast
Fred W. Mast University of Bern
Martin Kronbichler
Martin Kronbichler University of Salzburg
Anique B. H. de Bruin
Anique B. H. de Bruin Maastricht University
David F. Bjorklund
David F. Bjorklund Florida Atlantic University
Martin J. Herrmann
Martin J. Herrmann University of Würzburg
Caterina Pesce
Caterina Pesce Sapienza University of Rome
Simona Ghetti
Simona Ghetti University of California, Davis
Clancy Blair
Clancy Blair New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA offers students flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments. Many universities offer programs tailored to different career goals, from clinical psychology to organizational psychology.

Bachelor’s degrees are a popular starting point. Programs such as the easiest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston offer streamlined curricula suitable for beginners or those looking to transfer existing credits. At the graduate level, there are numerous options as well. Students seeking flexible post-graduate training may consider the USA easiest psychology doctorate degree online or explore master’s-level pathways.

Programs like the easiest online master's in psychology degree programs in California and the Pennsylvania easiest psychology master's degree online offer options designed for working adults and career changers. These online pathways can lead to roles in counseling, HR, research, and more, helping students transition smoothly into diverse psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia M. Roebers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles