World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claudia M. Roebers

Claudia M. Roebers

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5501 5110 62 60 212 8055

Claudia M. Roebers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudia M. Roebers between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudia M. Roebers published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2010. 16 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2010. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications
1995 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudia M. Roebers: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 4
2002 7
2003 3
2004 4
2005 4
2006 6
2007 7
2008 3
2009 3
2010 17
2011 7
2012 12
2013 16
2014 17
2015 13
2016 9
2017 13
2018 10
2019 10
2020 15
2021 17
2022 9
2023 8
2024 11
2025 5
Total 237
Download as CSV

Claudia M. Roebers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Roebers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 212
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudia M. Roebers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia M. Roebers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Claudia M. Roebers is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a substantial focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. Their work also extends into Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Roebers has contributed to various publication venues with several papers, especially in "Metacognition and Learning" and "PLoS ONE." Other important venues include "Psychology of Sport and Exercise," "British Journal of Developmental Psychology," and "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology."

Among Roebers' recent published papers are:

  • Physical activity and motor skills in children: A differentiated approach (2021), Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • The effect of video games, exergames and board games on executive functions in kindergarten and 2nd grade: An explorative longitudinal study (2021), Trends in Neuroscience and Education
  • Effects of Cognitive Training and Exergaming in Pediatric Cancer Survivors-A Randomized Clinical Trial (2020), Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Connecting teachers' classroom instructions with children's metacognition and learning in elementary school (2020), Metacognition and Learning
  • Self-regulation in Preschool Children: Factor Structure of Different Measures of Effortful Control and Executive Functions (2021), Journal of Cognition and Development

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Roebers include Mariëtte H. van Loon, Valentin Benzing, Valerie Siegwart, Michael A. Grotzer, and Maja Steinlin.

Best Publications

  • Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation

    Claudia M. Roebers

  • Cognitively Engaging Chronic Physical Activity, But Not Aerobic Exercise, Affects Executive Functions in Primary School Children: A Group-Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mirko Schmidt;Katja Jäger;Fabienne Egger;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Marianne Kauer

  • How do different aspects of self-regulation predict successful adaptation to school?

    Regula Neuenschwander;Marianne Röthlisberger;Patrizia Cimeli;Claudia M. Roebers

  • The relation between cognitive and motor performance and their relevance for children's transition to school: a latent variable approach.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Patrizia Cimeli

  • Improving executive functions in 5- and 6-year-olds: Evaluation of a small group intervention in prekindergarten and kindergarten children

    Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Patrizia Cimeli;Eva Michel

  • Developmental Patterns of Eyewitness Responses to Repeated and Increasingly Suggestive Questions

    William S. Cassel;Claudia E.M. Roebers;David F. Bjorklund

  • Confidence judgments in children's and adults' event recall and suggestibility

    Claudia M. Roebers

  • Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: An explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achievement

    Claudia M. Roebers;Patrizia Cimeli;Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander

  • Early metacognitive abilities: The interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5- to 7-year-old children

    Nesrin Destan;Emily Hembacher;Simona Ghetti;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Disentangling the relationship between children's motor ability, executive function and academic achievement

    Mirko Schmidt;Fabienne Egger;Valentin Benzing;Katja Jäger

  • The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults

    Claudia M. Roebers;Wolfgang Schneider

  • Development of Cognitive Skills in Children with Motor Coordination Impairments at 12-Month Follow-up

    Eva Michel;Marianne Roethlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Claudia M Roebers

  • Cognitive and physiological effects of an acute physical activity intervention in elementary school children.

    Katja Jäger;Mirko Schmidt;Achim Conzelmann;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Confidence judgments in event recall: developmental progression in the impact of question format.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Pauline Howie

  • School enrolment and executive functioning: A longitudinal perspective on developmental changes, the influence of learning context, and the prediction of pre-academic skills

    Claudia M. Roebers;Marianne Röthlisberger;Patrizia Cimeli;Eva Michel

  • Exekutive Funktionen: Zugrundeliegende kognitive Prozesse und deren Korrelate bei Kindern im späten Vorschulalter

    Marianne Röthlisberger;Regula Neuenschwander;Eva Michel;Claudia Maria Roebers

  • Metacognitive monitoring and control in elementary school children: Their interrelations and their role for test performance

    Claudia M. Roebers;Saskia S. Krebs;Thomas Roderer

  • Executive functions, visual-motor coordination, physical fitness and academic achievement: Longitudinal relations in typically developing children.

    Nicole Oberer;Venera Gashaj;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.

    Saskia S. Krebs;Claudia M. Roebers

  • Children's metamemorial judgments in an event recall task.

    Claudia M. Roebers;Nicole von der Linden;Wolfgang Schneider;Pauline Howie

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Schneider
Wolfgang Schneider University of Würzburg
Beat Meier
Beat Meier University of Bern
Fred W. Mast
Fred W. Mast University of Bern
Martin Kronbichler
Martin Kronbichler University of Salzburg
Anique B. H. de Bruin
Anique B. H. de Bruin Maastricht University
David F. Bjorklund
David F. Bjorklund Florida Atlantic University
Martin J. Herrmann
Martin J. Herrmann University of Würzburg
Caterina Pesce
Caterina Pesce Sapienza University of Rome
Simona Ghetti
Simona Ghetti University of California, Davis
Clancy Blair
Clancy Blair New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA offers students flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments. Many universities offer programs tailored to different career goals, from clinical psychology to organizational psychology.

Bachelor’s degrees are a popular starting point. Programs such as the easiest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston offer streamlined curricula suitable for beginners or those looking to transfer existing credits. At the graduate level, there are numerous options as well. Students seeking flexible post-graduate training may consider the USA easiest psychology doctorate degree online or explore master’s-level pathways.

Programs like the easiest online master's in psychology degree programs in California and the Pennsylvania easiest psychology master's degree online offer options designed for working adults and career changers. These online pathways can lead to roles in counseling, HR, research, and more, helping students transition smoothly into diverse psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia M. Roebers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles