World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martine B. Powell

Martine B. Powell

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4849 4494 276 268 322 9391

Martine B. Powell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martine B. Powell between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martine B. Powell published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2024. 18 of the 391 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2024. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

391 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martine B. Powell: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 0
1994 3
1995 0
1996 1
1997 4
1998 1
1999 3
2000 4
2001 3
2002 9
2003 11
2004 7
2005 8
2006 7
2007 14
2008 12
2009 11
2010 9
2011 18
2012 15
2013 18
2014 23
2015 20
2016 16
2017 23
2018 10
2019 18
2020 16
2021 19
2022 15
2023 18
2024 31
2025 17
2026 1
Total 391
Download as CSV

Martine B. Powell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martine B. Powell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 322 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 322
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martine B. Powell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martine B. Powell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martine B. Powell is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia, where their research focuses on social sciences and psychology, with a significant number of publications in these fields. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, and gender studies.

The primary research topics covered by Martine B. Powell include memory processes and influences, deception detection and forensic psychology, child abuse and trauma, sexual assault and victimization studies, interpreting and communication in healthcare, criminal justice and corrections analysis, and simulation-based education in healthcare.

Martine B. Powell has contributed to various academic venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Psychiatry Psychology and Law
  • Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Current Issues in Criminal Justice

Their recent papers include:

  • "Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations," 2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice," 2021, Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • "The origin, experimental basis, and application of the standard interview method: An information-gathering framework," 2020, Australian Psychologist
  • "An overview of mock interviews as a training tool for interviewers of children," 2022, Child Abuse & Neglect
  • "Synthesizing a Talking Child Avatar to Train Interviewers Working with Maltreated Children," 2022, Big Data and Cognitive Computing

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors:

  • Sonja P. Brubacher
  • Sarah L. Deck
  • Jane Goodman-Delahunty
  • Nina Westera
  • Natalie Martschuk

Martine B. Powell has published books through the Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks, including the title "Online child sexual offenders' language use in real-time chats" in 2021.

Best Publications

  • The relationship of interparental conflict and global marital adjustment to aggression, anxiety, and immaturity in aggressive and nonclinic children

    Mark R. Dadds;Martine B. Powell

  • A Guide to Interviewing Children: Essential Skills for Counsellors, Police Lawyers and Social Workers

    J. Clare Wilson;Martine Powell

  • Guide to questioning children during the free‐narrative phase of an investigative interview

    Martine B Powell;Pamela Claire Snow

  • Oral Language Competence, Social Skills and High-risk Boys: What are Juvenile Offenders Trying to Tell us?

    Pamela Claire Snow;Martine B Powell

  • The Effects of Repeated Experience on Children's Suggestibility.

    Martine B. Powell;Kim P. Roberts;Stephen J. Ceci;Helene Hembrooke

  • Children's Memory of an Occurrence of a Repeated Event: Effects of Age, Repetition, and Retention Interval across Three Question Types

    Martine B. Powell;Donald M. Thomson

  • Describing individual incidents of sexual abuse: a review of research on the effects of multiple sources of information on children’s reports

    Kim P Roberts;Martine B Powell

  • Oral language competence in incarcerated young offenders: Links with offending severity

    Pamela C. Snow;Martine B. Powell

  • The effect of intellectual disability on children's recall of an event across different question types.

    Sarah E. Agnew;Martine B. Powell

  • Investigative Interviewers' Perceptions of Their Difficulty in Adhering to Open-Ended Questions with Child Witnesses

    Rebecca Wright;Martine B. Powell

  • What's the story? An exploration of narrative language abilities in male juvenile offenders

    Pamela Claire Snow;Martine B Powell

  • Designing effective training programs for investigative interviewers of children

    Martine B. Powell

  • Child abuse investigation: An in‐depth analysis of how police officers perceive and cope with daily work challenges

    Rebecca Wright;Martine B. Powell;Damien Ridge

  • Youth (in)justice: oral language competence in early life and risk for engagement in antisocial behaviour in adolescence

    Pamela Snow;Martine Powell

  • Developmental language disorders and adolescent risk: A public-health advocacy role for speech pathologists?

    Pamela Claire Snow;Martine B Powell

  • Improving the competency of police officers in conducting investigative interviews with children

    Martine B. Powell;Rebecca Wright;Susan Clark

  • Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations.

    Conor Gilligan;Erica L James;Pamela Snow;Sue Outram

  • Police Officers' and Legal Professionals' Perceptions Regarding How Children Are, and Should Be, Questioned about Repeated Abuse

    Belinda L. Guadagno;Martine B. Powell;Rebecca Wright

  • Evaluation of a comprehensive interactive training system for investigative interviewers of children

    Mairi S. Benson;Martine B. Powell

  • Skill in Interviewing Reduces Confirmation Bias

    Martine B. Powell;Carolyn H. Hughes-Scholes;Stefanie J. Sharman

  • Specialist Training in Investigative and Evidential Interviewing: Is it Having Any Effect on the Behaviour of Professionals in the Field?

    Martine B. Powell

  • An examination of the degree to which IQ, memory performance, socio-economic status and gender predict young children's suggestibility

    Felicity McFarlane;Martine B. Powell;Paul Dudgeon

Frequent Co-Authors

Pamela Claire Snow
Pamela Claire Snow La Trobe University
David Boud
David Boud Deakin University
Andrew Day
Andrew Day University of Melbourne
Jarrad A. G. Lum
Jarrad A. G. Lum Deakin University
Helen Skouteris
Helen Skouteris Monash University
Stephen J. Ceci
Stephen J. Ceci Cornell University
Stephen Walkley Smallbone
Stephen Walkley Smallbone Griffith University
Gilles E. Gignac
Gilles E. Gignac University of Western Australia
Richard Wortley
Richard Wortley University College London
Rebecca Milne
Rebecca Milne University of Portsmouth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA offers a diverse range of online degree options and exciting career pathways. Students can start with an associate or bachelor’s degree, then progress to a master’s or doctorate, often specializing in areas such as clinical, counseling, or organizational psychology.

Universities across the nation provide strong programs recognized for their curriculum and commitment to student success. The best-ranked psychology degree programs in Oklahoma and the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Orlando highlight how regional differences can shape learning experiences and research opportunities.

For those considering the West Coast, the most popular psychology degree programs in Reno and top-ranked psychology degree programs in Seattle emphasize access to leading faculty, innovative coursework, and flexible online formats.

With increased demand for mental health professionals, pursuing an online psychology degree can lead to rewarding roles in healthcare, education, research, and business. It’s important to research programs thoroughly to find the best fit for your academic and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martine B. Powell

Trending Scientists