World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4503 4167 2499 2261 127 17729

Maggie Bruck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maggie Bruck between 1955 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maggie Bruck published across 67 years, from 1955 to 2021, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 1995. 2 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 1995. 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 3 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 24 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1955 2021

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maggie Bruck: publications per year, 1955 to 2021
Year Publications
1955 1
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 3
1977 1
1978 3
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 2
1983 0
1984 3
1985 5
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 0
1990 4
1991 2
1992 4
1993 6
1994 2
1995 24
1996 2
1997 5
1998 8
1999 3
2000 3
2001 0
2002 3
2003 0
2004 4
2005 2
2006 1
2007 5
2008 2
2009 5
2010 0
2011 4
2012 2
2013 2
2014 2
2015 2
2016 1
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
Total 129
Download as CSV

Maggie Bruck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maggie Bruck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Maggie Bruck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maggie Bruck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maggie Bruck is a researcher affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Psychology, with notable contributions in Clinical Psychology, Health, and Social Psychology. The research topics explored include Child Abuse and Trauma, Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights, Migration, Health and Trauma, as well as Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology.

The scholar's recent publications reveal active engagement with issues related to child abuse and forensic psychological methods. Among the published papers are:

  • "Analyzing the scientific foundation of Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome: A reply to Lyon et al." (2020) in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
  • "Issue Information" (2024) in Applied Cognitive Psychology

Bruck's collaborative network includes several frequent co-authors, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement and joint research efforts. These co-authors are:

  • Stephen J. Ceci
  • Kamala London
  • Quincy C. Miller
  • Michael E. Lamb
  • Graham Davies Editor

The primary venues for publication are Behavioral Sciences & the Law and Applied Cognitive Psychology, each featuring multiple works by Bruck. These venues indicate a focus on applied psychological science, especially in contexts related to law and cognitive processes.

The body of work demonstrates an emphasis on understanding complex social and psychological phenomena, particularly those impacting vulnerable populations such as children and Indigenous communities. The integration of forensic psychology topics highlights an interest in legal and investigative dimensions of psychological research.

Best Publications

  • Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.

    Stephen J. Ceci;Maggie Bruck

  • Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony

    Stephen J. Ceci;Maggie Bruck

  • Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits.

    Maggie Bruck

  • DISCLOSURE OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE What Does the Research Tell Us About the Ways That Children Tell

    Kamala London;Maggie Bruck;Stephen J. Ceci;Daniel W. Shuman

  • THE SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN'S MEMORY

    Maggie Bruck;Stephen J. Ceci

  • Word-Recognition Skills of Adults with Childhood Diagnoses of Dyslexia.

    Maggie Bruck

  • The Possible Role of Source Misattributions in the Creation of False Beliefs Among Preschoolers

    Stephen J. Ceci;Elizabeth F. Loftus;Michelle D. Leichtman;Maggie Bruck

  • Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: the case of initial consonant clusters.

    Maggie Bruck;Rebecca Treiman

  • The Effect of Oral and Written Language Input on Children′s Phonological Awareness: A Cross-Linguistic Study

    Marketa Caravolas;Maggie Bruck

  • Review of the contemporary literature on how children report sexual abuse to others: Findings, methodological issues, and implications for forensic interviewers

    Kamala London;Maggie Bruck;Daniel B. Wright;Stephen J. Ceci

  • Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading

    Joan Backman;Joan Backman;Margaret Bruck;Martine Hebert;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Phonological Awareness in Young Second Language Learners

    Maggie Bruck;Fred Genesee

  • Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks

    Gloria S. Waters;Mark S. Seidenberg;Margaret Bruck

  • Individual Differences in Children's Suggestibility: A Review and Synthesis

    Maggie Bruck;Laura Melnyk

  • Attention bias toward threat in pediatric anxiety disorders.

    Amy Krain Roy;Roma A. Vasa;Maggie Bruck;Karin Mogg

  • Not all nonwords are alike: implications for reading development and theory.

    Rebecca Treiman;Usha Goswami;Maggie Bruck

  • A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition.

    Maggie Bruck;Fred Genesee;Marketa Caravolas

  • Reliability and credibility of young children's reports: From research to policy and practice.

    Maggie Bruck;Stephen J. Ceci;Helene Hembrooke

  • "I hardly cried when I got my shot!" Influencing children's reports about a visit to their pediatrician.

    Maggie Bruck;Stephen J. Ceci;Emmett Francoeur;Ronald Barr

  • Autobiographical memory and suggestibility in children with autism spectrum disorder.

    Maggie Bruck;Kamala London;Rebecca Landa;June Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. Ceci
Stephen J. Ceci Cornell University
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine
Rebecca Treiman
Rebecca Treiman Washington University in St. Louis
Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University
Fred Genesee
Fred Genesee McGill University
Gloria Waters
Gloria Waters Boston University
Steven Jay Lynn
Steven Jay Lynn Binghamton University
Richard J. McNally
Richard J. McNally Harvard University
Brendan P. Bradley
Brendan P. Bradley University of Southampton
Roma A. Vasa
Roma A. Vasa Kennedy Krieger Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open doors to various rewarding careers, particularly in social work and mental health services. Many students choose to combine their psychology studies with a social work degree to gain hands-on skills in helping individuals and communities thrive.

Online degrees in social work are becoming increasingly popular, enabling students to study flexibly while preparing for diverse career opportunities. It’s important to consider affordability when selecting a program. For students located in the Northeast, there are affordable social work degrees in Boston to explore. Likewise, those on the West Coast can review the most affordable social work degree programs in California.

Midwestern students might consider the most affordable social work degree programs in Chicago or look into options in Ohio, including the most affordable social work degree programs in Columbus. Whether your goal is counseling, advocacy, or research, choosing an accessible online degree is a smart way to begin a meaningful career in the behavioral sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Maggie Bruck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles