World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7875
World Ranking
9082
National Ranking
911

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
7985
World Ranking
8700
National Ranking
649

Michelle de Haan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle de Haan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 97 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michelle de Haan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle de Haan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michelle de Haan is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive and developmental processes in early childhood. The scientist's work is categorized primarily under the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, and Clinical Psychology.

The research topics that de Haan has explored include:

  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Multisensory perception and integration

Michelle de Haan has authored several recent papers, with notable examples including:

  • "ERP markers are associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in 1-5 month old infants in rural Africa and the UK" (2020) published in NeuroImage
  • "Late- but not early-onset blindness impairs the development of audio-haptic multisensory integration" (2020) published in Developmental Science
  • "Developmental trajectories of infants born at less than 30 weeks' gestation on the Bayley-III Scales" (2020) published in Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal
  • "Mother-infant interactions with infants with congenital visual impairment and associations with longitudinal outcomes in cognition and language" (2020) published in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • "Longitudinal fNIRS and EEG metrics of habituation and novelty detection are correlated in 1-18-month-old infants" (2023) published in NeuroImage

The most frequent publication venues for de Haan include:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • NeuroImage
  • Developmental Science
  • Children
  • Infancy

Collaborations have featured various frequent coauthors, notably:

  • Iroise Dumontheil
  • Mark H. Johnson
  • Laura Katus
  • Luke Mason
  • Sophie E. Moore

Best Publications

  • Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life?

    Olivier Pascalis;Michelle de Haan;Charles A. Nelson

  • Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants

    Michelle De Haan;Olivier Pascalis;Mark H. Johnson

  • Annual research review: Parenting and children’s brain development: The end of the beginning.

    Jay Belsky;Michelle de Haan

  • Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams syndrome.

    Sarah J. Grice;Michael W. Spratling;Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Hanife Halit

  • The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development

    Mark H Johnson;Richard Griffin;Gergely Csibra;Hanife Halit

  • Development of face-sensitive event-related potentials during infancy: a review

    Michelle de Haan;Mark H. Johnson;Hanife Halit

  • Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces.

    Halit H;de Haan M;Johnson Mh

  • Categorical perception of facial expressions by 7-month-old infants.

    Eleni Kotsoni;Michelle de Haan;Michelle de Haan;Mark H Johnson

  • Maternal Personality and Infants' Neural and Visual Responsivity to Facial Expressions of Emotion.

    Michelle de Haan;Jay Belsky;Vincent Reid;Agnes Volein

  • Brain and cognitive‐behavioural development after asphyxia at term birth

    Michelle de Haan;John S. Wyatt;Simon Roth;Faraneh Vargha-Khadem

  • Infant EEG and event-related potentials

    Michelle de Haan

  • Prevalence and risk factors for autism spectrum disorder in epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lauren Strasser;Michelle Downes;Jane Kung;J Helen Cross

  • Human memory development and its dysfunction after early hippocampal injury.

    Michelle de Haan;Mortimer Mishkin;Torsten Baldeweg;Faraneh Vargha-Khadem

  • Deferred Imitation of Action Sequences in Developmental Amnesia

    Anna-Lynne R. Adlam;Faraneh Vargha-khadem;Mortimer Mishkin;Michelle De Haan

  • Developing a brain specialized for face perception: a converging methods approach.

    Michelle de Haan;Kate Humphreys;Mark H. Johnson

  • Recording and analyzing high-density event-related potentials with infants. Using the Geodesic sensor net.

    M. H. Johnson;M. De Haan;A. Oliver;W. Smith

  • Heterogeneity in the patterns of neural abnormality in autistic spectrum disorders: evidence from ERP and MRI.

    Claire H. Salmond;Faraneh Vargha-Khadem;David G. Gadian;Michelle de Haan

  • Event-related potential measures of executive functioning from preschool to adolescence

    Michelle Downes;Joe Bathelt;Michelle De Haan

  • Neonatal Hypoxia, Hippocampal Atrophy, and Memory Impairment: Evidence of a Causal Sequence

    Janine M. Cooper;David G. Gadian;Sebastian Jentschke;Allan Goldman

  • Early developmental outcomes in children following convulsive status epilepticus: a longitudinal study

    Marina M. Martinos;Michael Yoong;Shekhar Patil;Wui K. Chong

  • Explicit memory in low-risk infants aged 19 months born between 27 and 42 weeks of gestation.

    Michelle de Haan;Patricia J Bauer;Michael K Georgieff;Charles A Nelson

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles R. Newton
Charles R. Newton University of Oxford
Brian G. R. Neville
Brian G. R. Neville University College London
Fenella J. Kirkham
Fenella J. Kirkham University College London
Mark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson University of Cambridge
Faraneh Vargha-Khadem
Faraneh Vargha-Khadem University College London
Rod C. Scott
Rod C. Scott University of Vermont
Torsten Baldeweg
Torsten Baldeweg University College London
Mortimer Mishkin
Mortimer Mishkin National Institutes of Health
J. Helen Cross
J. Helen Cross Great Ormond Street Hospital
Olivier Pascalis
Olivier Pascalis Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in neuroscience, but considering various educational routes or adjacent career options? The rise of flexible online programs has made it easier to study a range of disciplines from anywhere in the USA.

Those hoping to enter clinical practice may benefit from exploring online psyd programs, which train students for careers in psychology and mental health. Another in-demand path is marriage and family therapy; students with interests in counseling can look into online mft programs that provide a streamlined path to licensure.

If you're aiming to enter the workforce quickly, earning a bachelor degree online in 2 years is now possible thanks to accelerated formats. This can lead to more immediate job prospects, especially in high-growth fields.

For students focused on future earnings, reviewing the highest paying bachelor degrees entry-level may help guide your study choices, with several applicable to neuroscience-related roles. From clinical psychology to research or therapy, a variety of online options make advanced pathways more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle de Haan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles