World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
92
Citations
36860
World Ranking
871
National Ranking
103

Annette Karmiloff-Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annette Karmiloff-Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 375 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Annette Karmiloff-Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annette Karmiloff-Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Annette Karmiloff-Smith was affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spanned multiple main fields including Medicine and Psychology, with substantial contributions in subfields such as Developmental and Educational Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Developmental Neuroscience.

Their scholarly work focused on various topics related to neurodevelopmental and genetic disorders. Key research areas included:

  • Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Williams Syndrome Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Annette Karmiloff-Smith contributed to a number of peer-reviewed papers, several of which addressed developmental disorders and neurocognitive impairments. Notable recent publications comprised:

  • "Health comorbidities and cognitive abilities across the lifespan in Down syndrome" (2020), Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • "Patient-specific Alzheimer-like pathology in trisomy 21 cerebral organoids reveals BACE2 as a gene dose-sensitive AD suppressor in human brain" (2020), Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Is the Motor Impairment in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) a Co-Occurring Deficit or a Phenotypic Characteristic?" (2020), Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • "A multi-level developmental approach to exploring individual differences in Down syndrome: genes, brain, behaviour, and environment" (2020), Research in Developmental Disabilities
  • "Genetic dissection of down syndrome-associated alterations in APP/amyloid-β biology using mouse models" (2021), Scientific Reports

Their work was frequently published in venues such as Research in Developmental Disabilities, Molecular Psychiatry, Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Scientific Reports, and the Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, reflecting a focus on neurodevelopmental and psychiatric research contexts.

Throughout their career, Annette Karmiloff-Smith frequently collaborated with several coauthors, contributing to multiple publications alongside:

  • Hana D'Souza
  • André Strydom
  • John Hardy
  • Elizabeth Fisher
  • Frances K. Wiseman

These collaborations supported research exploring genetic and environmental influences on neurodevelopmental conditions and their behavioral manifestations. Annette Karmiloff-Smith's investigations integrated multidisciplinary approaches in cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology, and medical genetics.

Best Publications

  • Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development

    M Harris;A Karmiloff-Smith;D Parisi;K Plunkett

  • A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders.

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data ☆

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • If you want to get ahead, get a theory☆

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Bärbel Inhelder

  • Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes

    Simon Baron-Cohen;Ruth Campbell;Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Julia Grant

  • A genetic cause of Alzheimer disease: mechanistic insights from Down syndrome

    Frances K. Wiseman;Tamara Al-Janabi;John Hardy;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Using developmental trajectories to understand developmental disorders.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;Dagmara Annaz;Daniel Ansari;Gaia Scerif

  • Pathways to Language: From Fetus to Adolescent

    Kyra Karmiloff;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Nativism versus neuroconstructivism: rethinking the study of developmental disorders

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Is there a social module? language, face processing, and theory of mind in individuals with williams syndrome

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Edward Klima;Ursula Bellugi;Julia Grant

  • The cognizer's innards: A psychological and philosophical perspective on the development of thought.

    Andy Clark;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams syndrome.

    Sarah J. Grice;Michael W. Spratling;Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Hanife Halit

  • Williams syndrome: from genotype through to the cognitive phenotype.

    Dian Donnai;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Cognitive Modularity and Genetic Disorders

    S. J. Paterson;J. H. Brown;M. K. Gsödl;M. H. Johnson

  • Constraints on representational change: evidence from children's drawing

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling.

    Michael S.C. Thomas;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Language and Williams syndrome: how intact is "intact"?

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Julia Grant;Ioanna Berthoud;Mark Davies

  • Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective

    Annette Karmiloff-smith

  • Development itself is the key to understanding developmental

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S.C. Thomas
Michael S.C. Thomas Birkbeck, University of London
Gaia Scerif
Gaia Scerif University of Oxford
Kim Cornish
Kim Cornish Monash University
Daniel Ansari
Daniel Ansari University of Western Ontario
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Sarah Paterson
Sarah Paterson Temple University
Mayada Elsabbagh
Mayada Elsabbagh McGill University
Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Eileen Daly
Eileen Daly King's College London
Emily Simonoff
Emily Simonoff King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths, especially in mental health counseling and therapy. Graduates often aim to become Licensed Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs), a popular career that requires a careful understanding of state-specific educational and licensing requirements.

For example, students interested in how to become an mft in Miami will find that Florida’s regulations may differ from those in other states. Similarly, individuals should review the Milwaukee mft certification requirements to ensure they meet Wisconsin’s standards.

Students planning to practice in Minnesota need to research mft requirements in Minneapolis, while those heading to Tennessee should understand the mft requirements in Nashville. Each state may specify unique coursework, supervised experience, and examination criteria.

Whether studying online or in-person, it’s crucial to align your degree plan with the licensing rules for your chosen location. Carefully researching career pathways and regional requirements ensures a smooth transition from student to professional.

Best Scientists Citing Annette Karmiloff-Smith

Recently Published Articles