World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5642 5240 584 554 208 10635
Neuroscience 48 6144 5659 495 453 205 10408

Michael S.C. Thomas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael S.C. Thomas between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael S.C. Thomas published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2020. 23 of the 274 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2020. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 11 publications
1973 2025

274 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael S.C. Thomas: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 4
2000 2
2001 7
2002 7
2003 5
2004 4
2005 9
2006 10
2007 5
2008 10
2009 10
2010 11
2011 10
2012 8
2013 9
2014 14
2015 15
2016 11
2017 7
2018 15
2019 12
2020 19
2021 11
2022 19
2023 10
2024 12
2025 11
Total 274
Download as CSV

Michael S.C. Thomas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S.C. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 208
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael S.C. Thomas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S.C. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael S.C. Thomas is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, focusing notably on neuroscience, social sciences, and psychology. Within these broader fields, they have contributed extensively to cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and education, among other subfields.

Their research topics cover areas including neuroscience, education, and cognitive function; Down syndrome and intellectual disability research; reading and literacy development; educational and psychological assessments; language development and disorders; autism spectrum disorder research; and glioma diagnosis and treatment.

Frequent publication venues for Michael S.C. Thomas include:

  • Mind Brain and Education
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities
  • International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
  • Developmental Science
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

They have authored and contributed to various papers, some of which are:

  • Education, the science of learning, and the COVID-19 crisis (2020), published in Prospects
  • Health comorbidities and cognitive abilities across the lifespan in Down syndrome (2020), published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Influences on cognitive outcomes in adult patients with gliomas: A systematic review (2022), published in Frontiers in Oncology
  • Stress and Learning in Pupils: Neuroscience Evidence and its Relevance for Teachers (2021), published in Mind Brain and Education
  • Neuromyths About Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Misconceptions by Educators and the General Public (2021), published in Mind Brain and Education

Michael S.C. Thomas has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Cathy Rogers, Andrew Tolmie, Jo Van Herwegen, Iroise Dumontheil, and Mireille B. Toledano.

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to book publications, notably "The Science of Adult Literacy" published in 2020 by World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Mental disorder in adults with intellectual disability. 1: Prevalence of functional psychiatric illness among a community-based population aged between 16 and 64 years.

    S. Deb;M. Thomas;C. Bright

  • Neuroconstructivism - I: How the Brain Constructs Cognition

    Denis Mareschal;Mark H. Johnson;Sylvain Sirois;Michael W. Spratling

  • Using developmental trajectories to understand developmental disorders.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;Dagmara Annaz;Daniel Ansari;Gaia Scerif

  • Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling.

    Michael S.C. Thomas;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Exploring the Williams syndrome face‐processing debate: the importance of building developmental trajectories

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Michael Thomas;Dagmara Annaz;Kate Humphreys

  • Verbal and non-verbal intelligence changes in the teenage brain

    Sue Ramsden;Fiona M. Richardson;Goulven Josse;Michael S. C. Thomas

  • Language Switching Costs in Bilingual Visual Word Recognition

    Michael S.C Thomas;Alan Allport

  • Mental disorder in adults with intellectual disability. 2: The rate of behaviour disorders among a community-based population aged between 16 and 64 years.

    S. Deb;M. Thomas;C. Bright

  • Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;Daniel Ansari;Victoria C. P. Knowland

  • What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical and atypical number development.

    Daniel Ansari;Chris Donlan;Michael S.C. Thomas;Sandra A. Ewing

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • Past tense formation in Williams syndrome

    Michael S.C. Thomas;Julia Grant;Zita Barham;Marisa Gsödl

  • Modeling language acquisition in atypical phenotypes.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • A cross-syndrome study of the development of holistic face recognition in children with autism, Down syndrome, and Williams syndrome.

    Dagmara Annaz;Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Mark H. Johnson;Michael S.C. Thomas

  • New Advances in Understanding Sensitive Periods in Brain Development

    Michael S.C. Thomas;Mark H. Johnson

  • Night-time screen-based media device use and adolescents' sleep and health-related quality of life.

    Michael O. Mireku;Mary M. Barker;Julian Mutz;Iroise Dumontheil

  • Multiple Routes from Occipital to Temporal Cortices during Reading

    Fiona M Richardson;Mohamed L Seghier;Alex P Leff;Michael S C Thomas

  • Précis of neuroconstructivism: how the brain constructs cognition.

    Sylvain Sirois;Michael Spratling;Michael S. C. Thomas;Gert Westermann

  • Development of motion processing in children with autism

    Dagmara Annaz;Dagmara Annaz;Anna Remington;Elizabeth Milne;Mike Coleman

  • Connectionist models of cognition.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;James L. McClelland

  • Different approaches to relating genotype to phenotype in developmental disorders.

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith;G. Scerif;Michael S.C. Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith Birkbeck, University of London
Denis Mareschal
Denis Mareschal Birkbeck, University of London
Paul Elliott
Paul Elliott Imperial College London
Martin Röösli
Martin Röösli Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Iroise Dumontheil
Iroise Dumontheil Birkbeck, University of London
Jackie Masterson
Jackie Masterson University College London
George D. Magoulas
George D. Magoulas Birkbeck, University of London
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London
Daniel Ansari
Daniel Ansari University of Western Ontario
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a wide range of online degree options and professional pathways. Many students pursue a bachelor’s or master’s in psychology or counseling online, providing flexibility to balance studies with work or family commitments. These programs can help graduates meet requirements for roles such as mental health counselor, school counselor, or clinical psychologist.

It’s important to remember that licensure and certification requirements vary by state and city. For instance, Mesa mental health counselor certification requirements might differ from those you’ll need if you want to become a mental health counselor in Miami. Similarly, steps for how to become a mental health counselor in Milwaukee or to become a mental health counselor in Minneapolis can require different state exams, supervised clinical hours, and continuing education.

Before choosing your online program or career path, be sure to review local requirements and consider your long-term goals within the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S.C. Thomas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles