World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 37 8687 8026 645 597 106 8597

Iroise Dumontheil publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iroise Dumontheil between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iroise Dumontheil published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2020. 10 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
2004 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iroise Dumontheil: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 6
2008 2
2009 0
2010 8
2011 5
2012 6
2013 2
2014 6
2015 6
2016 6
2017 2
2018 7
2019 9
2020 17
2021 6
2022 7
2023 6
2024 4
2025 6
Total 116
Download as CSV

Iroise Dumontheil publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iroise Dumontheil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 106 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 106
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Iroise Dumontheil D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iroise Dumontheil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 37
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society

Overview

Iroise Dumontheil is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work addresses topics such as child and animal learning development, neuroscience related to education and cognitive function, and cognitive as well as developmental aspects of mathematical skills.

The primary topics covered in Dumontheil's research include:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Development and Digital Technology

Dumontheil has contributed notably to a range of publications in prominent journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Developmental Science
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts

Some of Dumontheil's recent papers are:

  • Internalising and externalising in early adolescence predict later executive function, not the other way around: a cross-lagged panel analysis (2021), published in Cognition & Emotion
  • Multi-Level Meta-Analysis of Physical Activity Interventions During Childhood: Effects of Physical Activity on Cognition and Academic Achievement (2023), published in Educational Psychology Review
  • Social networking site use in young adolescents: Association with health-related quality of life and behavioural difficulties (2020), published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • Digital Technology Use and BMI: Evidence From a Cross-sectional Analysis of an Adolescent Cohort Study (2021), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Modulatory effects of SES and multilinguistic experience on cognitive development: a longitudinal data analysis of multilingual and monolingual adolescents from the SCAMP cohort (2022), published in International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

The research collaborations of Dumontheil include frequent co-authorship with Michelle de Haan, Mark H. Johnson, Denis Mareschal, Michael S. C. Thomas, and Mireille B. Toledano.

Dumontheil's work has encompassed both empirical studies and meta-analyses, often concentrating on developmental cognitive neuroscience topics, cognitive and behavioral psychology, and the impact of technology on adolescent development.

The scientist has received the Spearman Medal from the British Psychological Society in 2015, reflecting recognition within the research community.

Best Publications

  • The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function.

    Paul W. Burgess;Iroise Dumontheil;Iroise Dumontheil;Sam J. Gilbert

  • Online Usage of Theory of Mind Continues to Develop in Late Adolescence.

    Iroise Dumontheil;Ian A. Apperly;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

  • The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology

    Paul W. Burgess;Nick Alderman;Catrin Forbes;Angela Costello

  • The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence.

    Leonora G. Weil;Stephen M. Fleming;Stephen M. Fleming;Iroise Dumontheil;Emma J. Kilford

  • Development of abstract thinking during childhood and adolescence: the role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex.

    Iroise Dumontheil

  • Function and localization within rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10)

    Paul W Burgess;Sam J Gilbert;Iroise Dumontheil

  • Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: implications of social neuroscience for education

    Catherine L. Sebastian;Geoffrey C.Y. Tan;Jonathan P. Roiser;Essi Viding

  • Brain Activity during a Visuospatial Working Memory Task Predicts Arithmetical Performance 2 Years Later

    Iroise Dumontheil;Torkel Klingberg

  • Comment on “Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought”

    Sam J. Gilbert;Iroise Dumontheil;Jon S. Simons;Chris D. Frith

  • Development of Rostral Prefrontal Cortex and Cognitive and Behavioural Disorders.

    Iroise Dumontheil;Paul W Burgess;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

  • Adolescent brain development

    Iroise Dumontheil

  • Influence of the COMT Genotype on Working Memory and Brain Activity Changes During Development

    Iroise Dumontheil;Chantal Roggeman;Tim Ziermans;Myriam Peyrard-Janvid

  • Night-time screen-based media device use and adolescents' sleep and health-related quality of life.

    Michael O. Mireku;Mary M. Barker;Julian Mutz;Iroise Dumontheil

  • The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function

    PW Burgess;JS Simons;I Dumontheil;SJ Gilbert

  • Distinct regions of medial rostral prefrontal cortex supporting social and nonsocial functions

    Sam J. Gilbert;Iain D. M. Williamson;Iroise Dumontheil;Jon S. Simons

  • Taking perspective into account in a communicative task.

    Iroise Dumontheil;Olivia Küster;Ian A. Apperly;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

  • Task rules, working memory, and fluid intelligence.

    John Duncan;Moritz Schramm;Russell Thompson;Iroise Dumontheil

  • Development of relational reasoning during adolescence.

    Iroise Dumontheil;Rachael Houlton;Kalina Christoff;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

  • Development of online use of theory of mind during adolescence: An eye-tracking study.

    Irene Symeonidou;Iroise Dumontheil;Wing-Yee Chow;Richard Breheny

  • Assembly and use of new task rules in fronto-parietal cortex

    Iroise Dumontheil;Russell Thompson;John Duncan

  • Development of the social brain during adolescence

    Iroise Dumontheil

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Sarah-Jayne Blakemore University of Cambridge
Sam J. Gilbert
Sam J. Gilbert University College London
Paul W. Burgess
Paul W. Burgess University College London
Paul Elliott
Paul Elliott Imperial College London
Michael S.C. Thomas
Michael S.C. Thomas Birkbeck, University of London
Martin Röösli
Martin Röösli Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Denis Mareschal
Denis Mareschal Birkbeck, University of London
Andrew Tolmie
Andrew Tolmie University College London
Juha Kere
Juha Kere Karolinska Institute
Jon S. Simons
Jon S. Simons University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens up a wide array of online study and career options. Many universities now offer accelerated degree programs online, allowing students to earn their credentials faster while balancing other commitments. These flexible pathways can be particularly advantageous if you’re eager to start a career in science or healthcare.

In addition to Neuroscience, you may consider pursuing high paying degrees in related sciences or health fields. Graduates in these areas often secure roles in research, biotech, or clinical settings. For those focused on financial outcomes, it’s worth exploring the highest paying jobs available to science and technology majors, which frequently include positions in medical research, data analysis, or pharmaceuticals.

For students mindful of tuition costs, there are many cheap online colleges that accept fafsa, making top-tier education more accessible. Combining affordable online programs with in-demand majors could lead to both academic and career success in Neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Iroise Dumontheil

Trending Scientists