World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 82 1306 1159 71 66 356 31044

Lydia Krabbendam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lydia Krabbendam between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lydia Krabbendam published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2014. 31 of the 403 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2014. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 19 publications
1998 2025

403 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lydia Krabbendam: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 3
2000 4
2001 1
2002 5
2003 14
2004 13
2005 17
2006 19
2007 12
2008 22
2009 16
2010 20
2011 18
2012 21
2013 27
2014 29
2015 25
2016 10
2017 9
2018 8
2019 20
2020 16
2021 19
2022 7
2023 16
2024 12
2025 19
Total 403
Download as CSV

Lydia Krabbendam publications per year - data summary

  • Lydia Krabbendam, a Psychology scholar from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, has 403 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 29 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998 and 2001, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 14.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 14.4 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 73 publications, 18% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 89 publications (8.9 per year); 2008-2017: 197 publications (19.7 per year); 2018-2025: 117 publications (14.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Lydia Krabbendam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lydia Krabbendam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 356 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 356
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lydia Krabbendam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Lydia Krabbendam, a Psychology scholar from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, records 356 publications - the 92nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 92% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Lydia Krabbendam, and about 8% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Lydia Krabbendam ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Lydia Krabbendam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lydia Krabbendam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 82
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Lydia Krabbendam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Lydia Krabbendam, a Psychology scholar from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, records 82 D-Index - the 89th percentile of the discipline.
  • 89% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Lydia Krabbendam, and about 11% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Lydia Krabbendam ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Lydia Krabbendam is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health as key subfields.

Their work explores a range of topics including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Among recent publications, Krabbendam authored the paper titled "Understanding urbanicity: how interdisciplinary methods help to unravel the effects of the city on mental health" published in 2020 in Psychological Medicine. Other notable papers from the same year, although not led by Krabbendam, include studies on memory integration in Scientific Reports, adolescent cognitive effort in Cognitive Development, brain volume analysis in Human Brain Mapping, and neural correlates of self and other processing in NeuroImage.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Mariët van Buuren
  • Hester Sijtsma
  • Miriam Hollarek
  • Reubs J. Walsh
  • Nikki Lee

Krabbendam's publications are commonly found in journals such as:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • NeuroImage
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness-persistence-impairment model of psychotic disorder

    J van Os;R J Linscott;Inez Myin-Germeys;P Delespaul

  • Genome-wide association study identifies five new schizophrenia loci

    Stephan Ripke;Alan R. Sanders;Kenneth S. Kendler;Douglas F. Levinson

  • Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs

    S. Hong Lee;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Stephen V. Faraone

  • The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

    Anne Kathrin J. Fett;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Maria de Gracia Dominguez;David L. Penn

  • Prospective cohort study of cannabis use, predisposition for psychosis, and psychotic symptoms in young people

    Cécile Henquet;Lydia Krabbendam;Janneke Spauwen;Charles Kaplan

  • Childhood abuse as a risk factor for psychotic experiences.

    I.C.M. Janssen;L. Krabbendam;M.L.F.J. Bak;M.S.S. Hanssen

  • Meta-analyses of cognitive functioning in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives

    B. Arts;N. Jabben;L. Krabbendam;J. van Os

  • Schizophrenia and Urbanicity: A Major Environmental Influence—Conditional on Genetic Risk

    Lydia Krabbendam;Jim van Os

  • Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways

    Colm O'Dushlaine;Lizzy Rossin;Phil H. Lee;Laramie Duncan;Laramie Duncan

  • Validity and reliability of the CAPE: a self-report instrument for the measurement of psychotic experiences in the general population.

    M Konings;M Bak;M Hanssen;J van Os

  • Impact of psychological trauma on the development of psychotic symptoms: relationship with psychosis proneness.

    Janneke Spauwen;Lydia Krabbendam;Roselind Lieb;Hans-Ulrich Wittchen

  • Cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A quantitative review

    Lydia Krabbendam;Baer Arts;Jim van Os;André Aleman

  • Alterations in theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and non-psychotic relatives

    I. Janssen;L. Krabbendam;J. Jolles;Jim Van Os

  • An Experimental Study of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Val158Met Moderation of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced Effects on Psychosis and Cognition

    Cecile Henquet;Araceli Rosa;Lydia Krabbendam;Sergi Papiol

  • Are psychotic psychopathology and neurocognition orthogonal? A systematic review of their associations.

    Maria de Gracia Dominguez;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Claudia J. P. Simons;Jim van Os

  • Does normal developmental expression of psychosis combine with environmental risk to cause persistence of psychosis? A psychosis proneness-persistence model.

    Audrey Cougnard;Machteld Marcelis;Inez Myin-Germeys;Ron De Graaf

  • Neuroticism and low self-esteem as risk factors for psychosis.

    Lydia Krabbendam;Ilse Janssen;Maarten Bak;Rob V. Bijl

  • Cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia: a quantitative analysis of controlled studies.

    Lydia Krabbendam;André Aleman

  • Childhood Trauma and Psychosis: A Case-Control and Case-Sibling Comparison Across Different Levels of Genetic Liability, Psychopathology, and Type of Trauma

    Manuela Heins;Claudia Simons;Tineke Lataster;Stefanie Pfeifer

  • Joint Analysis of Psychiatric Disorders Increases Accuracy of Risk Prediction for Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder

    Robert Maier;Gerhard Moser;Guo-Bo Chen;Stephan Ripke

  • The neuropsychology of schizophrenia

    L. Krabbendam;J. Jolles

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
André Aleman
André Aleman University Medical Center Groningen
Sukhwinder S. Shergill
Sukhwinder S. Shergill King's College London
Wiepke Cahn
Wiepke Cahn Utrecht University
Roselind Lieb
Roselind Lieb University of Basel
René S. Kahn
René S. Kahn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Thomas G. Schulze
Thomas G. Schulze Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
R. de Graaf
R. de Graaf Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a variety of online degree options and career pathways, particularly in mental health counseling. Many students pursue advanced degrees online to meet professional requirements and achieve flexibility around their schedules.

If you aspire to become a mental health counselor, it’s crucial to understand the education, licensure, and certification requirements, which can differ by location. For example, San Diego mental health counselor education requirements may include obtaining a master’s degree and fulfilling state-specific supervision hours. Those looking to become a mental health counselor in San Francisco should review regional qualifying exams and internship provisions.

In addition, San Jose mental health counselor certification requirements may emphasize accredited graduate programs and extensive clinical experience. Meanwhile, pathways to become a mental health counselor in Santa Ana offer unique insights into local workplace demands.

Exploring online degrees can provide greater flexibility, allowing you to pursue specialized certifications and shape your psychology career according to your interests and your state’s requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Lydia Krabbendam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles