World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
89
Citations
38869
World Ranking
982
National Ranking
53

R. de Graaf publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. de Graaf sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 238 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

R. de Graaf D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. de Graaf sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Psychiatry
  • Internal medicine
  • Major depressive disorder

His primary scientific interests are in Psychiatry, Mental health, Clinical psychology, Anxiety and Prevalence of mental disorders. The Psychiatry study combines topics in areas such as Epidemiology and Risk factor. His Risk factor research integrates issues from Odds ratio, Psychosis and Confidence interval.

His study in Mental health is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Psychological intervention, Global health and Young adult. The concepts of his Clinical psychology study are interwoven with issues in Meta-analysis and Alcohol abuse. The various areas that he examines in his Anxiety disorder study include Psychosocial, Psychopathology and Mood.

His most cited work include:

  • Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: Results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project (1385 citations)
  • Cross-national prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (1000 citations)
  • Cannabis Use and Psychosis: A Longitudinal Population-based Study (747 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Psychiatry, Mental health, Clinical psychology, Anxiety and Depression. Psychiatry connects with themes related to Epidemiology in his study. His research in Mental health focuses on subjects like Public health, which are connected to Developmental psychology.

In his study, Risk factor is inextricably linked to Psychosis, which falls within the broad field of Clinical psychology. Much of his study explores Anxiety relationship to Mood. His study focuses on the intersection of Depression and fields such as Severity of illness with connections in the field of Age of onset.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Psychiatry (62.92%)
  • Mental health (40.45%)
  • Clinical psychology (32.58%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Mental health (40.45%)
  • Psychiatry (62.92%)
  • Clinical psychology (32.58%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

R. de Graaf mainly focuses on Mental health, Psychiatry, Clinical psychology, Incidence and Depression. His Mental health study incorporates themes from Anxiety disorder and Public health. He interconnects Guideline, Subclinical infection and Pediatrics in the investigation of issues within Anxiety disorder.

His Psychiatry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Prospective cohort study, Occupational safety and health and Absenteeism. His Clinical psychology research includes themes of Psychosocial, Big Five personality traits, Personality, Quality of life and Anxiety. His work carried out in the field of Incidence brings together such families of science as Psychiatric history, Association, Confounding and CIDI.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Job strain as a risk factor for clinical depression: systematic review and meta-analysis with additional individual participant data (137 citations)
  • What Factors are Associated with Flourishing? Results from a Large Representative National Sample (65 citations)
  • Recurrence and chronicity of major depressive disorder and their risk indicators in a population cohort (36 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Major depressive disorder

His primary areas of study are Depression, Clinical psychology, Cohort study, Vein and Surgery. His Depression study is focused on Psychiatry in general. His work focuses on many connections between Clinical psychology and other disciplines, such as Psychosocial, that overlap with his field of interest in Schizophrenia, Psychopathology, Distress, Anxiety and Mood.

His Cohort study research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Meta-analysis, Job strain, Confidence interval and Risk factor. R. de Graaf has researched Vein in several fields, including Venous Obstruction, Radiology, Femoral vein, Post-thrombotic syndrome and Vascular Patency. His Epidemiology research includes elements of Incidence, Minor depressive disorder, Anxiety disorder, Vulnerability and Selection bias.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: Results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project

    J Alonso;M C Angermeyer;S Bernert;R Bruffaerts

  • Cross-national prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

    J. Fayyad;R. De Graaf;R. Kessler;J. Alonso

  • The epidemiology of major depressive episodes: results from the International Consortium of Psychiatric Epidemiology (ICPE) Surveys

    Laura Andrade;Jorge J. Caraveo-Anduaga;Patricia A. Berglund;Rob V. Bijl

  • The prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

    Ronald C. Kessler;Patricia A. Berglund;Wai Tat Chiu;Anne C. Deitz

  • Barriers to mental health treatment: Results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys

    LH Andrade;J Alonso;Z Mneimneh;JE Wells

  • Cannabis Use and Psychosis: A Longitudinal Population-based Study

    J van Os;M Bak;M Hanssen;R V Bijl

  • The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA): rationale, objectives and methods.

    B.W.J.H. Penninx;A.T.F. Beekman;J.H Smit;F.G. Zitman

  • Childhood abuse as a risk factor for psychotic experiences.

    I.C.M. Janssen;L. Krabbendam;M.L.F.J. Bak;M.S.S. Hanssen

  • Mental disorders among persons with chronic back or neck pain: results from the World Mental Health Surveys.

    Koen Demyttenaere;Ronny Bruffaerts;Sing Lee;José Posada-Villa

  • Risk factors for suicidality in Europe: results from the ESEMED study

    M. Bernal;J.M. Haro;S. Bernert;T. Brugha

  • Disability and quality of life impact of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

    J Alonso;M C Angermeyer;S Bernert;R Bruffaerts

  • Same-sex sexual behavior and psychiatric disorders: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)

    Theo G. M. Sandfort;Ron de Graaf;Rob V. Bijl;Paul Schnabel

  • The Structure and Stability of Common Mental Disorders: The NEMESIS Study

    Wilma A. M. Vollebergh;Jurjen Iedema;Rob V. Bijl;Ron de Graaf

  • Depression–anxiety relationships with chronic physical conditions: Results from the World Mental Health surveys

    KM Scott;Ronny Bruffaerts;A Tsang;J Ormel

  • Use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project

    J Alonso;M C Angermeyer;S Bernert;R Bruffaerts

  • The epidemiology of eating disorders in six European countries: Results of the ESEMeD-WMH project

    Antonio Preti;Giovanni de Girolamo;Gemma Vilagut;Jordi Alonso

  • Perceived Barriers to Mental Health Service Utilization in the United States, Ontario, and the Netherlands

    Jitender Sareen;Amit Jagdeo;Brian J. Cox;Ian Clara

  • Prevalence and predictors of recurrence of major depressive disorder in the adult population

    F. Hardeveld;J. Spijker;R. De Graaf;W. A. Nolen

  • Risk factors for 12-month comorbidity of mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study.

    Ron de Graaf;Rob V Bijl;Filip Smit;Wilma A M Vollebergh

  • CUMULATIVE TRAUMAS AND RISK THRESHOLDS: 12-MONTH PTSD IN THE WORLD MENTAL HEALTH (WMH) SURVEYS

    Elie G. Karam;Matthew J. Friedman;Eric D. Hill;Ronald C Kessler

Frequent Co-Authors

Jordi Alonso
Jordi Alonso Pompeu Fabra University
G. de Girolamo
G. de Girolamo Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh Utrecht University
Josep Maria Haro
Josep Maria Haro University of Barcelona
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Johan Ormel
Johan Ormel University Medical Center Groningen
Willem A. Nolen
Willem A. Nolen University Medical Center Groningen
Lydia Krabbendam
Lydia Krabbendam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA often leads students to consider related online degrees, especially in counseling and mental health services. With the rising demand for mental health professionals, affordable and accessible education has become a crucial factor for prospective students. Fortunately, there are a variety of affordable options available across major US cities, each with its own unique strengths and focus areas.

For those seeking to minimize overall costs, the cheapest counseling programs in Berkeley offer an excellent starting point. Alternatively, students interested in vibrant metropolitan areas can explore affordable counseling programs in Boston or affordable counseling programs in Chicago, both of which feature diverse academic and clinical experiences.

If you are considering education within the state, a comprehensive list of affordable counseling degrees in California can help guide your search. Graduates from these programs can pursue a variety of career pathways, including school counseling, clinical therapy, nonprofit work, and more. With affordable online degrees and flexible study options, achieving your career goals in psychology and counseling has never been more attainable.

Best Scientists Citing R. de Graaf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles