World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Femke Lamers

Femke Lamers

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
16069
World Ranking
2604
National Ranking
139

Femke Lamers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Femke Lamers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 204 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Femke Lamers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Femke Lamers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Femke Lamers is affiliated with Amsterdam UMC in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields including Psychology, Medicine, and Neuroscience. Within these areas, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Biological Psychiatry, and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Their work primarily focuses on topics related to Mental Health Research, Tryptophan and brain disorders, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Cancer survivorship and care, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Health, Environment, and Cognitive Aging.

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis," 2020, published in Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • "Depression Heterogeneity and Its Biological Underpinnings: Toward Immunometabolic Depression," 2020, published in Biological Psychiatry
  • "Association of inflammation with depression and anxiety: evidence for symptom-specificity and potential causality from UK Biobank and NESDA cohorts," 2021, published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Fatigue in patients with chronic disease: results from the population-based Lifelines Cohort Study," 2021, published in Scientific Reports
  • "Depression profilers and immuno-metabolic dysregulation: Longitudinal results from the NESDA study," 2020, published in Brain Behavior and Immunity

Frequent co-authors in Lamers's research include Brenda W.J.H. Penninx with 91 coauthored works, Sara Siddi (43), Faith Matcham (42), Matthew Hotopf (42), and Josep María Haro (40).

Their publications appear predominantly in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Affective Disorders, arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Biological Psychiatry.

Best Publications

  • Comorbidity Patterns of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in a Large Cohort Study: the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)

    Femke Lamers;Patricia van Oppen;Hannie C. Comijs;Johannes H. Smit

  • Understanding the somatic consequences of depression: biological mechanisms and the role of depression symptom profile

    Brenda W J H Penninx;Yuri Milaneschi;Femke Lamers;Nicole Vogelzangs

  • Evidence for a differential role of HPA-axis function, inflammation and metabolic syndrome in melancholic versus atypical depression

    F. Lamers;N. Vogelzangs;K. R. Merikangas;de Peter Jonge

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: Results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)

    Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Willem A. Nolen;Femke Lamers;Frans G. Zitman

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Association of inflammation with depression and anxiety : evidence for symptom-specificity and potential causality from UK Biobank and NESDA cohorts

    Yuri Milaneschi;Nils Kappelmann;Zheng Ye;Femke Lamers

  • Identifying depressive subtypes in a large cohort study: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).

    Femke Lamers;Peter de Jonge;Willem A. Nolen;Johannes H. Smit

  • Sleep Patterns and Mental Health Correlates in US Adolescents.

    Jihui Zhang;Diana Paksarian;Femke Lamers;Ian B. Hickie

  • Leptin Dysregulation Is Specifically Associated With Major Depression With Atypical Features: Evidence for a Mechanism Connecting Obesity and Depression

    Yuri Milaneschi;Femke Lamers;Mariska Bot;Madeleine L. Drent

  • Summed score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was a reliable and valid method for depression screening in chronically ill elderly patients

    Femke Lamers;Catharina C.M. Jonkers;Hans Bosma;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx

  • Depressive and anxiety disorders and the association with obesity, physical, and social activities.

    Leonore M. de Wit;Marjolein Fokkema;Annemieke van Straten;Femke Lamers

  • Using network analysis to examine links between individual depressive symptoms, inflammatory markers, and covariates

    E I Fried;S von Stockert;J M B Haslbeck;F Lamers

  • Genetic Association of Major Depression With Atypical Features and Obesity-Related Immunometabolic Dysregulations.

    Yuri Milaneschi;Femke Lamers;Wouter J Peyrot;Bernhard T Baune

  • Sleep, circadian rhythm, and physical activity patterns in depressive and anxiety disorders: A 2-week ambulatory assessment study.

    Sonia Difrancesco;Femke Lamers;Harriëtte Riese;Kathleen R. Merikangas

  • Using Smartphones and Wearable Devices to Monitor Behavioral Changes During COVID-19.

    Shaoxiong Sun;Amos A. Folarin;Amos A. Folarin;Yatharth Ranjan;Zulqarnain Rashid

  • Polygenic dissection of major depression clinical heterogeneity

    Yuri Milaneschi;F. Lamers;Wouter Peyrot;Abdel Abdellaoui

  • Sociodemographic and psychiatric determinants of attrition in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).

    Femke Lamers;Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn;Johannes H. Smit;Richard van Dyck

  • Longitudinal Association Between Depression and Inflammatory Markers: Results From the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety

    Femke Lamers;Yuri Milaneschi;Johannes H Smit;Robert A Schoevers

  • Real-time Mobile Monitoring of the Dynamic Associations Among Motor Activity, Energy, Mood, and Sleep in Adults With Bipolar Disorder.

    Kathleen Ries Merikangas;Joel Swendsen;Joel Swendsen;Ian B. Hickie;Lihong Cui

  • Metabolic and inflammatory markers: associations with individual depressive symptoms

    F Lamers;Y Milaneschi;P de Jonge;E J Giltay

Frequent Co-Authors

Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Kathleen R. Merikangas
Kathleen R. Merikangas National Institutes of Health
Robert A. Schoevers
Robert A. Schoevers University Medical Center Groningen
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hans Bosma
Hans Bosma Maastricht University
Harriette Riese
Harriette Riese University Medical Center Groningen
Johannes H. Smit
Johannes H. Smit Leiden University Medical Center
Eco J. C. de Geus
Eco J. C. de Geus Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Flávia de Lima Osório
Flávia de Lima Osório Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. One popular path is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Due to varying state regulations, it's crucial to understand the specific steps required in your desired location.

For example, if you are interested in pursuing a counseling career in Arizona, explore the mft requirements in Phoenix. Pennsylvania residents can also find detailed information by learning about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Pittsburgh.

Other cities offer unique pathways too. If Texas appeals to you, be sure to review the mft requirements in Plano. Meanwhile, Florida-based students can learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Port St. Lucie.

As you consider your next step, compare programs that match both your career goals and state licensure requirements. A tailored educational path will help you build the essential skills and credentials to thrive in today’s dynamic mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Femke Lamers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles