World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Flávia de Lima Osório

Flávia de Lima Osório

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6926 6456 11 11 164 8674

Flávia de Lima Osório publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Flávia de Lima Osório between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Flávia de Lima Osório published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2017. 14 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2017. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
2004 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Flávia de Lima Osório: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 10
2009 2
2010 6
2011 6
2012 8
2013 11
2014 13
2015 16
2016 17
2017 21
2018 15
2019 12
2020 13
2021 14
2022 17
2023 12
2024 9
2025 5
Total 215
Download as CSV

Flávia de Lima Osório publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Flávia de Lima Osório sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 164 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 164
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Flávia de Lima Osório D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Flávia de Lima Osório sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Flávia de Lima Osório is affiliated with the Universidade de São Paulo in Brazil. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics covered in Flávia de Lima Osório's body of work include:

  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Healthcare Professionals' Stress and Burnout
  • Occupational Health and Burnout

They frequently publish in several venues, including:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • European Psychiatry
  • UNC Libraries
  • Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Their recent papers include:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol Plus Standard Care vs Standard Care Alone for the Treatment of Emotional Exhaustion and Burnout Among Frontline Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Ayahuasca Improves Self-perception of Speech Performance in Subjects With Social Anxiety Disorder, 2021, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Rapid and sustained decreases in suicidality following a single dose of ayahuasca among individuals with recurrent major depressive disorder: results from an open-label trial, 2020, Psychopharmacology

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Flávia de Lima Osório include:

  • Jaime E. C. Hallak
  • Rafael G. dos Santos
  • Sônia Regina Loureiro
  • Antônio Waldo Zuardi
  • Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas

Best Publications

  • Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

    Fernanda Palhano-Fontes;Dayanna Barreto;Heloisa Onias;Katia C. Andrade

  • Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression: A preliminary report

    Flávia de L. Osório;Rafael F. Sanches;Ligia R. Macedo;Rafael G. dos Santos

  • Antidepressant Effects of a Single Dose of Ayahuasca in Patients With Recurrent Depression: A SPECT Study.

    Rafael Faria Sanches;Flávia de Lima Osório;Rafael G. dos Santos;Ligia R.H. Macedo

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years.

    Rafael G. dos Santos;Flávia L. Osório;José Alexandre S. Crippa;Jordi Riba

  • Study of the discriminative validity of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 in a sample of Brazilian women in the context of primary health care.

    Flávia de Lima Osório;Ana Vilela Mendes;José Alexandre Crippa;Sonia Regina Loureiro

  • Clinical validity and intrarater and test–retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 – Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV)

    Flávia L. Osório;Flávia L. Osório;Sonia Regina Loureiro;Sonia Regina Loureiro;Jaime Eduardo C. Hallak;Jaime Eduardo C. Hallak;João Paulo Machado‐de‐Sousa;João Paulo Machado‐de‐Sousa

  • Factor structure, reliability, and item parameters of the brazilian-portuguese version of the GAD-7 questionnaire

    André Luiz Moreno;Diogo A. de Sousa;Ana Maria Frota Lisbôa P. Souza;Gisele Gus Manfro

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Andrea Benedetti;John P.A. Ioannidis;Ying Sun

  • Antidepressive and anxiolytic effects of ayahuasca: a systematic literature review of animal and human studies

    Rafael G. dos Santos;Flávia de Lima Osório;José Alexandre de Souza Crippa;Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak

  • Social phobia in Brazilian university students: prevalence, under-recognition and academic impairment in women.

    Carlos Alberto Baptista;Sonia Regina Loureiro;Flávia de Lima Osório;Antonio Waldo Zuardi

  • Comparability between telephone and face-to-face structured clinical interview for DSM-IV in assessing social anxiety disorder.

    José Alexandre S Crippa;Flávia de Lima Osório;Cristina Marta Del-Ben;Alaor Santos Filho

  • Classical hallucinogens and neuroimaging: A systematic review of human studies: Hallucinogens and neuroimaging.

    Rafael G. dos Santos;Flávia de Lima Osório;José Alexandre de Souza Crippa;Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak

  • The Associations Between Oxytocin and Trauma in Humans: A Systematic Review.

    Mariana Fortunata Donadon;Rocio Martin-Santos;Flávia de Lima Osório;Flávia de Lima Osório

  • Effects of Ayahuasca and its Alkaloids on Drug Dependence: A Systematic Literature Review of Quantitative Studies in Animals and Humans

    Amanda A. Nunes;Rafael G. dos Santos;Flávia de Lima Osório;Rafael F. Sanches

  • Facial emotion processing and recognition among maltreated children: a systematic literature review

    Gabriela C. da Silva Ferreira;José A. S. Crippa;José A. S. Crippa;Flávia de Lima Osório;Flávia de Lima Osório

  • Social anxiety disorder women easily recognize fearfull, sad and happy faces: The influence of gender

    Kátia C. Arrais;João Paulo Machado-de-Sousa;João Paulo Machado-de-Sousa;Clarissa Trzesniak;Clarissa Trzesniak;Alaor Santos Filho;Alaor Santos Filho

  • A study of the discriminative validity of a screening tool (MINI-SPIN) for social anxiety disorder applied to Brazilian university students

    Flávia de Lima Osório;José Alexandre Crippa;Sonia Regina Loureiro

  • The Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Algorithm for Screening to Detect Major Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

    Chen He;Chen He;Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Impact of an animal-assisted therapy programme on physiological and psychosocial variables of paediatric oncology patients.

    Nathiana B. Silva;Flávia de Lima Osório

  • Increased amygdalar and hippocampal volumes in young adults with social anxiety.

    João Paulo Machado-de-Sousa;Flávia de Lima Osório;Andrea P. Jackowski;Rodrigo A. Bressan

Frequent Co-Authors

José Alexandre de Souza Crippa
José Alexandre de Souza Crippa Universidade de São Paulo
Antonio Waldo Zuardi
Antonio Waldo Zuardi Universidade de São Paulo
Rocío Martín-Santos
Rocío Martín-Santos University of Barcelona
Scott B. Patten
Scott B. Patten University of Calgary
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Simon Gilbody
Simon Gilbody University of York
Bernd Löwe
Bernd Löwe Universität Hamburg
John P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis Stanford University
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall New York University Shanghai
Femke Lamers
Femke Lamers Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue advanced degrees, such as a master’s or doctorate in psychology, which enable them to specialize in fields like counseling, clinical psychology, or applied behavior analysis.

One fast-growing career option is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). This role focuses on helping individuals with behavioral challenges using evidence-based strategies. Educational and certification requirements for BCBAs can differ depending on location. For example, Oakland bcba requirements detail the necessary graduate coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, the process of becoming a bcba in Oklahoma City involves specific state guidelines to ensure proper training.

Understanding Omaha bcba education requirements and Orlando bcba education requirements can help you plan your educational journey and career steps more effectively. Earning your degree online not only offers flexibility but can also prepare you for diverse roles in research, human services, education, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Flávia de Lima Osório

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles