World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
11597
World Ranking
7129
National Ranking
708

Leor Roseman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leor Roseman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leor Roseman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leor Roseman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy;Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy;Leor Roseman;Mendel Kaelen

  • Quality of Acute Psychedelic Experience Predicts Therapeutic Efficacy of Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression

    Leor Roseman;David J. Nutt;Robin L. Carhart-Harris

  • Psychedelics and the essential importance of context.

    Robin L Carhart-Harris;Leor Roseman;Eline Haijen;David Erritzoe

  • Psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression: fMRI-measured brain mechanisms

    Robin L Carhart-Harris;Leor Roseman;Mark Bolstridge;Lysia Demetriou;Lysia Demetriou

  • Increased Global Functional Connectivity Correlates with LSD-Induced Ego Dissolution

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Enzo Tagliazucchi;Leor Roseman;Mendel Kaelen;Csaba Orban

  • Increased global integration in the brain after psilocybin therapy for depression

    Unknown

  • Psychedelics, Meditation, and Self-Consciousness.

    Raphaël Millière;Robin L. Carhart-Harris;Leor Roseman;Fynn Mathis Trautwein

  • Predicting Responses to Psychedelics: A Prospective Study.

    Eline C. H. M. Haijen;Mendel Kaelen;Leor Roseman;Christopher Timmermann

  • Emotional breakthrough and psychedelics: Validation of the Emotional Breakthrough Inventory.

    Leor Roseman;Eline Haijen;Kelvin Idialu-Ikato;Mendel Kaelen

  • Neural correlates of the DMT experience assessed with multivariate EEG

    Christopher Timmermann;Leor Roseman;Michael Schartner;Raphael Milliere

  • Effects of psilocybin therapy on personality structure

    D Erritzoe;L Roseman;MM Nour;MM Nour;K MacLean

  • The hidden therapist: evidence for a central role of music in psychedelic therapy

    Mendel Kaelen;Bruna Giribaldi;Jordan Raine;Lisa Evans

  • The effects of psilocybin and MDMA on between-network resting state functional connectivity in healthy volunteers.

    Leor Roseman;Robert Leech;Amanda Feilding;David J. Nutt

  • Increased amygdala responses to emotional faces after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression

    Leor Roseman;Lysia Demetriou;Matthew B. Wall;David J. Nutt

  • Connectome-harmonic decomposition of human brain activity reveals dynamical repertoire re-organization under LSD.

    Selen Atasoy;Leor Roseman;Mendel Kaelen;Morten L. Kringelbach

  • Dynamical exploration of the repertoire of brain networks at rest is modulated by psilocybin

    Louis-David Lord;Paul Expert;Selen Atasoy;Leor Roseman

  • Human brain effects of DMT assessed via EEG-fMRI

    Unknown

  • DMT Models the Near-Death Experience

    Christopher Timmermann;Leor Roseman;Luke Williams;David Erritzoe

  • The Effects of Acutely Administered 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine on Spontaneous Brain Function in Healthy Volunteers Measured with Arterial Spin Labeling and Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Resting State Functional Connectivity

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;Kevin Murphy;Robert Leech;David Erritzoe

  • Validation of the Psychological Insight Scale: A new scale to assess psychological insight following a psychedelic experience

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin L. Carhart-Harris
Robin L. Carhart-Harris University of California, San Francisco
David J. Nutt
David J. Nutt Imperial College London
Morten L. Kringelbach
Morten L. Kringelbach University of Oxford
Amanda Feilding
Amanda Feilding Beckley Foundation
Matthew B. Wall
Matthew B. Wall Imperial College London
Robert Leech
Robert Leech King's College London
Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy
Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy University of Auckland
David Erritzoe
David Erritzoe Imperial College London
Gustavo Deco
Gustavo Deco Pompeu Fabra University
Emmanuel Stamatakis
Emmanuel Stamatakis University of Sydney

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Leor Roseman

Recently Published Articles