World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 44 7040 6481 546 502 79 14486

Amanda Feilding publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda Feilding between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda Feilding published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2016. 7 of the 90 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2016. 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
2008 2025

90 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda Feilding: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 4
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 4
2016 14
2017 4
2018 4
2019 4
2020 9
2021 10
2022 8
2023 4
2024 6
2025 1
Total 90
Download as CSV

Amanda Feilding publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Feilding sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 79 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 79
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda Feilding D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Feilding sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 44
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda Feilding is affiliated with the Beckley Foundation in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses extensively on the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with significant contributions to clinical psychology and cellular and molecular neuroscience. Their work crosses interdisciplinary boundaries, also involving organic chemistry, nutrition and dietetics, and complementary and alternative medicine.

The primary topics covered in Feilding's research include psychedelics and drug studies, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, chemical synthesis and alkaloids, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, complementary and alternative medicine studies, tryptophan and brain disorders, and cannabis and cannabinoid research.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • Me, myself, bye: regional alterations in glutamate and the experience of ego dissolution with psilocybin (2020), Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Self-blinding citizen science to explore psychedelic microdosing (2021), eLife
  • Low Doses of LSD Acutely Increase BDNF Blood Plasma Levels in Healthy Volunteers (2020), ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
  • Spontaneous and deliberate creative cognition during and after psilocybin exposure (2021), Translational Psychiatry
  • Mood and cognition after administration of low LSD doses in healthy volunteers: A placebo controlled dose-effect finding study (2020), European Neuropsychopharmacology

Feilding frequently collaborates with a core group of coauthors, including Natasha L. Mason, Johannes G. Ramaekers, Kim P. C. Kuypers, Nadia R. P. W. Hutten, and Eef L. Theunissen. These partnerships have contributed to a cohesive body of work exploring various aspects of psychedelic substances and their effects on cognition and brain chemistry.

Their research has been published repeatedly in several notable venues, such as:

  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Psychopharmacology

The recurrent themes in Feilding's work highlight an interest in the neurochemical and behavioral effects of psychedelics, alongside investigations into biochemical methods to analyze these processes. The integration of complementary medicine and nutritional factors also forms part of their broader scientific inquiry.

Best Publications

  • Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;Mark Bolstridge;James Rucker;Camilla M. J. Day

  • The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs

    Robin Lester Carhart-Harris;Robert Leech;Peter John Hellyer;Murray Shanahan

  • Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;David Erritzoe;Tim Williams;James M. Stone

  • Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up.

    R. L. Carhart-Harris;M. Bolstridge;M. Bolstridge;C.M.J. Day;C.M.J. Day;J. Rucker;J. Rucker

  • Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy;Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy;Leor Roseman;Mendel Kaelen

  • Increased Global Functional Connectivity Correlates with LSD-Induced Ego Dissolution

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Enzo Tagliazucchi;Leor Roseman;Mendel Kaelen;Csaba Orban

  • Broadband Cortical Desynchronization Underlies the Human Psychedelic State

    Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy;Robin L Carhart-Harris;Rosalyn J Moran;Matthew J Brookes

  • Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment

    Amir Englund;Paul D Morrison;Judith Nottage;Dominic Hague

  • Finding the self by losing the self: Neural correlates of ego‐dissolution under psilocybin

    Alexander V. Lebedev;Alexander V. Lebedev;Martin Lövdén;Gidon Rosenthal;Amanda Feilding

  • The paradoxical psychological effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)

    R. L. Carhart-Harris;M. Kaelen;M. Bolstridge;T. M. Williams

  • LSD enhances suggestibility in healthy volunteers

    R. L. Carhart-Harris;M. Kaelen;M. G. Whalley;M. Bolstridge

  • LSD-induced entropic brain activity predicts subsequent personality change.

    Alexander V. Lebedev;M. Kaelen;Martin Lövdén;Jonna Nilsson

  • Implications for psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: functional magnetic resonance imaging study with psilocybin

    R. L. Carhart-Harris;R. Leech;T. M. Williams;D. Erritzoe

  • The hidden therapist: evidence for a central role of music in psychedelic therapy

    Mendel Kaelen;Bruna Giribaldi;Jordan Raine;Lisa Evans

  • The effects of psilocybin and MDMA on between-network resting state functional connectivity in healthy volunteers.

    Leor Roseman;Robert Leech;Amanda Feilding;David J. Nutt

  • Functional Connectivity Measures After Psilocybin Inform a Novel Hypothesis of Early Psychosis

    Robin L Carhart-Harris;Robert Leech;David Erritzoe;Tim M Williams

  • Exploring the therapeutic potential of Ayahuasca: acute intake increases mindfulness-related capacities

    Joaquim Soler;Matilde Elices;Alba Franquesa;Steven Barker

  • Ayahuasca: Pharmacology, neuroscience and therapeutic potential.

    Elisabet Domínguez-Clavé;Joaquim Soler;Matilde Elices;Juan C. Pascual

  • Me, myself, bye: regional alterations in glutamate and the experience of ego dissolution with psilocybin

    N. L. Mason;K. P. C. Kuypers;F. Müller;F. Müller;J. Reckweg

  • The Effects of Acutely Administered 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine on Spontaneous Brain Function in Healthy Volunteers Measured with Arterial Spin Labeling and Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Resting State Functional Connectivity

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;Kevin Murphy;Robert Leech;David Erritzoe

  • Assessing the Psychedelic "After-Glow" in Ayahuasca Users: Post-Acute Neurometabolic and Functional Connectivity Changes Are Associated with Enhanced Mindfulness Capacities.

    Frederic Sampedro;Mario de la Fuente Revenga;Marta Valle;Natalia Roberto

  • Inhibition of alpha oscillations through serotonin-2A receptor activation underlies the visual effects of ayahuasca in humans

    Marta Valle;Ana Elda Maqueda;Mireia Rabella;Aina Rodríguez-Pujadas

  • LSD enhances the emotional response to music.

    M. Kaelen;F. S. Barrett;L. Roseman;R. Lorenz

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Nutt
David J. Nutt Imperial College London
Robin L. Carhart-Harris
Robin L. Carhart-Harris University of California, San Francisco
Leor Roseman
Leor Roseman Imperial College London
Robert Leech
Robert Leech King's College London
David Erritzoe
David Erritzoe Imperial College London
Matthew B. Wall
Matthew B. Wall Imperial College London
Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy
Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy University of Auckland
Kim P. C. Kuypers
Kim P. C. Kuypers Maastricht University
James M. Stone
James M. Stone Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Celia J. A. Morgan
Celia J. A. Morgan University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Feilding

Trending Scientists