World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hannes Müller Schmied

Hannes Müller Schmied

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
35
Citations
7264
World Ranking
823
National Ranking
26

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
9488
World Ranking
8509
National Ranking
525

Hannes Müller Schmied publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannes Müller Schmied sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 97 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Hannes Müller Schmied D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannes Müller Schmied sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Hannes Müller Schmied is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany and focuses their research within Environmental Science, with 91 publications in this broad field. Their work spans multiple subfields, prominently Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Oceanography, Geochemistry and Petrology, and Environmental Engineering.

The primary topics addressed in their research include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Climate Variability and Models, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry, and Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change, 2021, Nature Climate Change
  • Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future, 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Globally observed trends in mean and extreme river flow attributed to climate change, 2021, Science
  • WFDE5: bias-adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies, 2020, Earth System Science Data
  • The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: model description and evaluation, 2021, Geoscientific Model Development

Among frequent co-authors in their collaborations are Simon N. Gosling, Naota Hanasaki, Yadu Pokhrel, Yusuke Satoh, and Yoshihide Wada.

Common publication venues for their research include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Geoscientific Model Development, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Geophysical Research Letters, and Nature Water.

Best Publications

  • Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change

    Yadu Pokhrel;Farshid Felfelani;Yusuke Satoh;Yusuke Satoh;Julien Boulange

  • Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites

    Petra Döll;Hannes Müller Schmied;Carina Schuh;Felix T. Portmann

  • Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data

    Bridget R. Scanlon;Zizhan Zhang;Himanshu Save;Alexander Y. Sun

  • Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)

    Katja Frieler;Stefan Lange;Franziska Piontek;Christopher P. O. Reyer

  • Globally observed trends in mean and extreme river flow attributed to climate change

    Lukas Gudmundsson;Julien Boulange;Hong X. Do;Hong X. Do;Hong X. Do;Simon N. Gosling

  • WFDE5: bias adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies

    Marco Cucchi;Graham P. Weedon;Alessandro Amici;Nicolas Bellouin

  • Recent global decline in endorheic basin water storages.

    Jida Wang;Chunqiao Song;Chunqiao Song;John T. Reager;Fangfang Yao

  • The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: model description and evaluation

    Hannes Müller Schmied;Denise Cáceres;Stephanie Eisner;Martina Flörke

  • How is the impact of climate change on river flow regimes related to the impact on mean annual runoff? A global-scale analysis

    Petra Döll;Hannes Müller Schmied

  • Human–water interface in hydrological modelling : current status and future directions

    Yoshihide Wada;Yoshihide Wada;Marc F. P. Bierkens;Ad de Roo;Paul A. Dirmeyer

  • State-of-the-art global models underestimate impacts from climate extremes

    Jacob Schewe;Simon N. Gosling;Christopher Reyer;Fang Zhao

  • Calibration/Data Assimilation Approach for Integrating GRACE Data into the WaterGAP Global Hydrology Model (WGHM) Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter: First Results

    Annette Eicker;Maike Schumacher;Jürgen Kusche;Petra Döll

  • Variations of global and continental water balance components as impacted by climate forcing uncertainty and human water use

    Hannes Müller Schmied;Linda Adam;Stephanie Eisner;Gabriel Fink

  • Projecting Exposure to Extreme Climate Impact Events Across Six Event Categories and Three Spatial Scales

    Stefan Lange;Jan Volkholz;Tobias Geiger;Tobias Geiger;Fang Zhao

  • Modelling Freshwater Resources at the Global Scale: Challenges and Prospects

    Petra Doll;Herve Douville;Andreas Guntner;Hannes Muller Schmied

  • Worldwide evaluation of mean and extreme runoff from six global-scale hydrological models that account for human impacts

    Jamal Zaherpour;Simon N Gosling;Nick Mount;Hannes Müller Schmied

  • Toward seamless hydrologic predictions across spatial scales

    Luis Samaniego;Rohini Kumar;Stephan Thober;Oldrich Rakovec

  • Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers

    Ashraf Rateb;Bridget R. Scanlon;Donald R. Pool;Alexander Sun

  • Uncertainty of simulated groundwater recharge at different global warming levels: a global-scale multi-model ensemble study

    Robert Reinecke;Hannes Müller Schmied;Tim Trautmann;Lauren Seaby Andersen

  • Understanding each other's models: an introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication

    Camelia-Eliza Telteu;Hannes Müller Schmied;Wim Thiery;Guoyong Leng

  • Seasonal Water Storage Variations as Impacted by Water Abstractions: Comparing the Output of a Global Hydrological Model with GRACE and GPS Observations

    Petra Döll;Mathias Fritsche;Annette Eicker;Hannes Müller Schmied

Frequent Co-Authors

Petra Döll
Petra Döll Goethe University Frankfurt
Yoshihide Wada
Yoshihide Wada King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Simon N. Gosling
Simon N. Gosling University of Nottingham
Dieter Gerten
Dieter Gerten Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Yadu Pokhrel
Yadu Pokhrel Michigan State University
Wim Thiery
Wim Thiery Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Naota Hanasaki
Naota Hanasaki National Institute for Environmental Studies
Manolis G. Grillakis
Manolis G. Grillakis Technical University of Crete
Stephanie Eisner
Stephanie Eisner University of Kassel
Jinfeng Chang
Jinfeng Chang Zhejiang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students consider affordable options, and programs listed under online general studies degree affordable provide flexible, budget-friendly routes to foundational knowledge that complements environmental studies.

For individuals seeking a less intensive academic track, some may find programs featured in easiest bachelor degree to get helpful. These degrees offer manageable coursework while maintaining relevance to environmental topics, ideal for those balancing work or other commitments.

Geology plays a fundamental role in understanding environmental systems. Those passionate about earth sciences can benefit from geology degrees online, which provide specialized training applicable to careers such as environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is increasingly vital for environmental analysis. Pursuing advanced education through top GIS masters programs equips students with cutting-edge skills for mapping, spatial data management, and environmental planning.

Best Scientists Citing Hannes Müller Schmied

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles