World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
7566
World Ranking
14708
National Ranking
6143

Martha M. Moore publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha M. Moore sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 163 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martha M. Moore D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha M. Moore sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martha M. Moore is affiliated with the National Center for Toxicological Research in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Environmental Science.

The core subfields of their work include Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Plant Science, Chemical Health and Safety, and Organic Chemistry. Their research topics focus significantly on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment, Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, Genetically Modified Organisms Research, Chemical Safety and Risk Management, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery, and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety.

The scientist has contributed to multiple papers, including:

  • Key challenges for in vitro testing of tobacco products for regulatory applications: Recommendations for dosimetry (2022) published in Drug Testing and Analysis
  • Revisiting the bacterial mutagenicity assays: Report by a workgroup of the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) (2020) published in Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Key Challenges and Recommendations for In Vitro Testing of Tobacco Products for Regulatory Applications: Consideration of Test Materials and Exposure Parameters (2023) published in Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
  • Workshop Series to Identify, Discuss, and Develop Recommendations for the Optimal Generation and Use of In Vitro Assay Data for Tobacco Product Evaluation: Phase 1 Genotoxicity Assays (2020) published in Applied In Vitro Toxicology
  • Development of a framework for risk assessment of dietary carcinogens (2023) published in Food and Chemical Toxicology

Frequent coauthors of Martha M. Moore include David Thorne, Rodger Curren, Robert Leverette, Leon F. Stankowski, and Jacqueline Miller-Holt.

Their work has appeared notably in the following publication venues:

  • Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
  • Drug Testing and Analysis
  • Applied In Vitro Toxicology
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology

Best Publications

  • Acrylamide: a review of its genotoxicity and an assessment of heritable genetic risk.

    Kerry L. Dearfield;George R. Douglas;Udo H. Ehling;Martha M. Moore

  • Relative genotoxic potency of arsenic and its methylated metabolites.

    Martha M Moore;Karen Harrington-Brock;Carolyn L Doerr

  • Analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells.

    Martha M. Moore;Donald Clive;John C. Hozier;Barry E. Howard

  • Molecular dissection of mutations at the heterozygous thymidine kinase locus in mouse lymphoma cells.

    M L Applegate;M M Moore;C B Broder;A Burrell

  • Cytogenetic analysis of the L5178Y/TK+/− → TK−/− mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay system

    John Hozier;Jeffrey Sawyer;Martha Moore;Barry Howard

  • Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: Follow‐up meeting of the international workshop on Genotoxicity testing—Aberdeen, Scotland, 2003—Assay acceptance criteria, positive controls, and data evaluation

    Martha M. Moore;Masamitsu Honma;Julie Clements;George Bolcsfoldi

  • Considerations in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's testing approach for mutagenicity

    Kerry L. Dearfield;Angela E. Auletta;Michael C. Cimino;Martha M. Moore

  • The L5178Y/tk+/− mouse lymphoma specific gene and chromosomal mutation assay: A phase III report of the U.S. environmental protection agency Gene-Tox program

    A.D Mitchell;A.E Auletta;D Clive;P.E Kirby

  • Chromosome 11 aberrations in small colony L5178Y TKPsu−/− mutants early in their clonal history

    John Hozier;Jeffrey Sawyer;Donald Clive;Martha M. Moore

  • Quantitative approaches for assessing dose–response relationships in genetic toxicology studies

    B.B. Gollapudi;G.E. Johnson;L.G. Hernandez;L.H. Pottenger

  • Silver nanoparticle-induced mutations and oxidative stress in mouse lymphoma cells.

    Nan Mei;Yongbin Zhang;Ying Chen;Xiaoqing Guo

  • Mutagenicity of bromate: Implications for cancer risk assessment

    Martha M. Moore;Tao Chen

  • Genotoxicity of acrylic acid, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, and ethyl methacrylate in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells.

    Martha M. Moore;Amanda Amtower;Carolyn L. Doerr;Karen H. Brock

  • Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: International Workshop on Genotoxicity Tests Workgroup report--Plymouth, UK 2002.

    Martha M Moore;Masamitsu Honma;Julie Clements;George Bolcsfoldi

  • Research paperIn situ analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells☆

    Martha M. Moore;Donald Clive;Barry E. Howard;A.Gail Batson

  • Differential mutant quantitation at the mouse lymphoma tk and CHO hgprt loci.

    Martha M. Moore;Karen Harrington-Brock;Carolyn L. Doerr;Kerry L. Dearfield

  • Size- and coating-dependent cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles evaluated using in vitro standard assays

    Xiaoqing Guo;Yan Li;Jian Yan;Taylor Ingle

  • Quantification of t(14;18) in the lymphocytes of healthy adult humans as a possible biomarker for environmental exposures to carcinogens

    James C. Fuscoe;R.Woodrow Setzer;Deborah D. Collard;Martha M. Moore

  • Cytogenetic distinction between the TK+ and TK− chromosomes in the L5178Y TK+ / − 3.7.2C mouse-lymphoma cell line

    John Hozier;Jeffrey Sawyer;Donald Clive;Martha Moore

  • Micronucleus, chromosome aberration, and small-colony TK mutant analysis to quantitate chromosomal damage in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells.

    Carolyn L. Doerr;Karen Harrington-Brock;Martha M. Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Heflich
Robert H. Heflich United States Food and Drug Administration
David M. DeMarini
David M. DeMarini Environmental Protection Agency
Peter P. Fu
Peter P. Fu United States Food and Drug Administration
James T. MacGregor
James T. MacGregor United States Food and Drug Administration
Lei Guo
Lei Guo National Center for Toxicological Research
Errol Zeiger
Errol Zeiger National Institutes of Health
Makoto Hayashi
Makoto Hayashi makoto international consulting
Avram Gold
Avram Gold University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stephen D. Dertinger
Stephen D. Dertinger University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring biology and biochemistry students will find many related online degrees that align well with their interests and career goals. For instance, pursuing the best online exercise science degree can open doors to careers in health and fitness, combining knowledge of biology with practical applications in movement and wellness.

Similarly, kinesiology online programs provide a foundation in human physiology, anatomy, and biomechanics. These programs are ideal for those interested in rehabilitation, sports science, or allied health professions.

For professionals with a healthcare background, exploring the shortest online pmhnp certificate programs enables a transition into psychiatric mental health nursing. This pathway blends clinical expertise with advanced biological knowledge for those interested in mental healthcare.

Finally, highly qualified nurses may consider a 12-month fnp program online to become Family Nurse Practitioners. This advanced certificate leverages biochemistry and biology for patient-centered clinical practice, providing a rewarding career path with strong employment prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Martha M. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles