World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 107 1018 969 616 582 401 41838
Medicine 107 6249 5879 3334 3092 401 42653

Nina Singh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nina Singh between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nina Singh published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 1998. 20 of the 429 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 1998. 1988: 5 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 27 publications 1998: 29 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 25 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 25 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications
1988 2025

429 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nina Singh: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 5
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 5
1994 13
1995 14
1996 16
1997 27
1998 29
1999 18
2000 25
2001 16
2002 25
2003 9
2004 13
2005 15
2006 23
2007 12
2008 19
2009 12
2010 22
2011 15
2012 7
2013 6
2014 2
2015 9
2016 6
2017 7
2018 3
2019 2
2020 8
2021 8
2022 5
2023 10
2024 8
2025 12
Total 429
Download as CSV

Nina Singh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Singh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 401 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 401
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nina Singh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Singh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nina Singh is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and has a substantial body of work in the field of medicine. Their research spans several subfields, most notably surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and hematology. The scientist's work primarily focuses on coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, acute myocardial infarction research, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, erythropoietin and anemia treatment, and iron metabolism and disorders.

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • Saline as an Alternative to Radio-Contrast for Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Comparison (2021), published in Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • Depression, anxiety, and quality of life after percutaneous coronary interventions (2022), published in Industrial Psychiatry Journal
  • Pulse oximetry screening to detect critical congenital heart diseases in asymptomatic neonates (2020), published in Medical Journal Armed Forces India
  • Safety, efficacy, and optical coherence tomography insights into intravascular lithotripsy for the modification of non-eruptive calcified nodules: A prospective observational study (2024), published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Coronary intravascular lithotripsy in contemporary practice: challenges and opportunities in coronary intervention (2024), published in Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nina Singh include:

  • Ankush Gupta
  • Sanya Chhikara
  • Nitin Bajaj
  • Rajesh Vijayvergiya
  • Balwinder Singh

The most common publication venues for their research are:

  • Medical Journal Armed Forces India
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal - Case Reports
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Nina Singh's contributions cover various aspects of medical research, particularly focused on cardiovascular and respiratory conditions as well as diagnostic technologies. Their work provides insights into interventional cardiology techniques, such as optical coherence tomography and intravascular lithotripsy, and explores broader clinical concerns including mental health outcomes after coronary interventions and screening for congenital heart diseases in neonates.

Best Publications

  • Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection.

    David L. Paterson;Susan Swindells;Jeffrey Mohr;Michelle Brester

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america.

    John R. Perfect;William E. Dismukes;Francoise Dromer;David L. Goldman

  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

    Oliver A. Cornely;Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo;Dorothee Arenz;Sharon C. A. Chen

  • Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription.

    Nina Singh;Paul Rogers;Charles W. Atwood;Marilyn M. Wagener

  • Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection (vol 133, pg 21, 2000)

    DL Paterson;S Swindells;J Mohr;M Brester

  • Aspergillus Infections in Transplant Recipients

    Nina Singh;David L. Paterson

  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients: Impact and Implications for Management

    Nina Singh;David L. Paterson

  • Determinants of compliance with antiretroviral therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus: prospective assessment with implications for enhancing compliance.

    Singh N;Squier C;Sivek C;Wagener M

  • Infections after Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of 101 Consecutive Cases

    S Kusne;J S Dummer;N Singh;S Iwatsuki

  • INVASIVE ASPERGILLOSIS IN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

    David L. Paterson;Nina Singh

  • Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients: variables influencing clinical characteristics and outcome.

    Shahid Husain;Marilyn M. Wagener;Nina Singh

  • Combination of voriconazole and caspofungin as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients: A prospective, multicenter, observational study

    Nina Singh;Nina Singh;Ajit P. Limaye;Graeme Forrest;Nasia Safdar

  • Infections Due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans in Transplant Recipients: Clinical Characteristics and Impact of Antifungal Agent Therapy on Outcome

    Shahid Husain;Patricia Muñoz;Graeme Forrest;Barbara D. Alexander

  • Infections with cytomegalovirus and other herpesviruses in 121 liver transplant recipients: transmission by donated organ and the effect of OKT3 antibodies.

    Nina Singh;J. Stephen Dummer;Shimon Kusne;Mary Kay Breinig

  • Opportunistic Mycelial Fungal Infections in Organ Transplant Recipients: Emerging Importance of Non-Aspergillus Mycelial Fungi

    Shahid Husain;Barbara D. Alexander;Patricia Munoz;Robin K. Avery

  • Trends in the Epidemiology of Opportunistic Fungal Infections: Predisposing Factors and the Impact of Antimicrobial Use Practices

    Nina Singh

  • Quality of life in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: impact of social support, coping style and hopelessness.

    Susan Swindells;Jeffrey Mohr;Janice C. Justis;Stephen Berman

  • Adherence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus—Infected Patients to Antiretroviral Therapy

    Nina Singh;Stephen M. Berman;Stephen M. Berman;Stephen M. Berman;Susan Swindells;Janice C. Justis;Janice C. Justis;Janice C. Justis

  • Aspergillus infections after lung transplantation: clinical differences in type of transplant and implications for management

    Nina Singh;Shahid Husain

  • Immune reconstitution syndrome associated with opportunistic mycoses

    Nina Singh;John R Perfect

Frequent Co-Authors

Marilyn M. Wagener
Marilyn M. Wagener University of Pittsburgh
Shahid Husain
Shahid Husain University Health Network
Victor L. Yu
Victor L. Yu University of Pittsburgh
David L. Paterson
David L. Paterson University of Queensland
Ajit P. Limaye
Ajit P. Limaye University of Washington
Olivier Lortholary
Olivier Lortholary Université Paris Cité
Barbara D. Alexander
Barbara D. Alexander Duke University
John J. Fung
John J. Fung University of Chicago
Patricia Muñoz
Patricia Muñoz Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Goran B. Klintmalm
Goran B. Klintmalm Baylor University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond a traditional medical degree, there are several flexible online options to consider. Non-nurses looking to advance quickly may benefit from direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online. These programs are tailored for career changers and can lead directly to advanced nursing roles.

If you're seeking a more accessible entry point into nursing, it’s worth exploring easy nursing schools to get into. These programs often have more flexible admission criteria, making them suitable for a wide range of students.

For those interested in administrative or allied health roles, medical billing and coding is a fast-growing field. Many schools offer financial support, so the answer to "can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding?" is often yes.

Finally, some entry-level nursing pathways are removing barriers to entry. If you're looking for an lpn program without teas test, several accredited schools now offer LPN tracks without standardized entrance exams.

Best Scientists Citing Nina Singh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles