World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
60
Citations
10747
World Ranking
1982
National Ranking
985

Robert H. Heflich publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Heflich sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 268 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Robert H. Heflich D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Heflich sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert H. Heflich is affiliated with the United States Food and Drug Administration in the United States. Their scholarly work intersects several disciplines within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, contributing significantly to cancer research, molecular biology, health, toxicology, mutagenesis, biochemistry, and physiology.

Their research focuses notably on carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, molecular biology techniques and applications, CRISPR and genetic engineering, sulfur compounds in biology, water treatment and disinfection, DNA repair mechanisms, and polyamine metabolism and applications.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Robert H. Heflich include Aisar Atrakchi, Xiaoqing Guo, Timothy J. McGovern, Nan Mei, and Xuefei Cao. These collaborations have resulted in multiple publications appearing in various scientific venues.

The most common publication venues for their work are:

  • Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
  • Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Archives of Toxicology
  • Toxicological Sciences

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Robert H. Heflich include:

  • Invited review: human air-liquid-interface organotypic airway tissue models derived from primary tracheobronchial epithelial cells-overview and perspectives, 2020, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
  • Use of in vitro 3D tissue models in genotoxicity testing: Strategic fit, validation status and way forward. Report of the working group from the 7th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), 2020, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Error-corrected next generation sequencing - Promises and challenges for genotoxicity and cancer risk assessment, 2023, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
  • Genetic toxicity testing using human in vitro organotypic airway cultures: Assessing DNA damage with the CometChip and mutagenesis by Duplex Sequencing, 2021, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
  • Error-corrected next-generation sequencing to advance nonclinical genotoxicity and carcinogenicity testing, 2023, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Best Publications

  • Genetic toxicity of 2-acetylaminofluorene, 2-aminofluorene and some of their metabolites and model metabolites

    Robert H. Heflich;Robin E. Neft

  • Arylamine-DNA adducts in vitro and in vivo: their role in bacterial mutagenesis and urinary bladder carcinogenesis.

    Frederick A. Beland;David T. Beranek;Kenneth L. Dooley;Robert H. Heflich

  • Formation of DNA Adducts in Vitro and in Salmonella typhimurium upon Metabolic Reduction of the Environmental Mutagen 1-Nitropyrene

    Paul C. Howard;Robert H. Heflich;Frederick E. Evans;Frederick A. Beland

  • Genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles evaluated using the Ames test and in vitro micronucleus assay

    Yan Li;David H. Chen;Jian Yan;Ying Chen

  • Development of an in vivo gene mutation assay using the endogenous Pig-A gene: I. Flow cytometric detection of CD59-negative peripheral red blood cells and CD48-negative spleen T-cells from the rat.

    Daishiro Miura;Vasily N. Dobrovolsky;Yoshinori Kasahara;Yasuhiro Katsuura

  • Reduction of nitroaromatic compounds by anaerobic bacteria isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract.

    F Rafil;W Franklin;R H Heflich;C E Cerniglia

  • Genotypic selection methods for the direct analysis of point mutations.

    Barbara L Parsons;Robert H Heflich

  • Accumulation of point mutations in mitochondrial DNA of aging mice

    Magomed Khaidakov;Robert H Heflich;Mugimane G Manjanatha;Meagan B Myers;Meagan B Myers

  • The in vivo pig-a gene mutation assay, a potential tool for regulatory safety assessment

    Vasily N. Dobrovolsky;Daishiro Miura;Robert H. Heflich;Stephen D. Dertinger

  • DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver.

    Nan Mei;Volker M. Arlt;David H. Phillips;Robert H. Heflich

  • Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in relation to DNA adduct formation in rats fed leucomalachite green.

    S.J Culp;F.A Beland;R.H Heflich;R.W Benson

  • The in vivo Pig-a assay: A report of the International Workshop On Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) Workgroup.

    B. Bhaskar Gollapudi;Anthony M. Lynch;Robert H. Heflich;Stephen D. Dertinger

  • In vivo transgenic mutation assays.

    Véronique Thybaud;Stephen Dean;Takehiko Nohmi;Johan de Boer

  • Report of the IWGT working group on strategies and interpretation of regulatory in vivo tests: I. Increases in micronucleated bone marrow cells in rodents that do not indicate genotoxic hazards

    D.J. Tweats;D. Blakey;R.H. Heflich;A. Jacobs

  • Induction of mutations and sister-chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells by ethylating agents.

    R.H. Heflich;D.T. Beranek;R.L. Kodell;S.M. Morris

  • Accumulation and persistence of Pig-A mutant peripheral red blood cells following treatment of rats with single and split doses of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea

    Daishiro Miura;Vasily N. Dobrovolsky;Takafumi Kimoto;Yoshinori Kasahara

  • The orientation of the nitro substituent predicts the direct-acting bacterial mutagenicity of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

    Peter P. Fu;Ming W. Chou;Dwight W. Miller;Gail L. White

  • Fungal metabolism and detoxification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

    Carl E. Cerniglia;Gail L. White;Robert H. Heflich

  • Derivation of point of departure (PoD) estimates in genetic toxicology studies and their potential applications in risk assessment

    G.E. Johnson;L.G. Soeteman-Hernández;B.B. Gollapudi;O.G. Bodger

  • Rapid isolation, hydrolysis and chromatography of formaldehyde-modified DNA.

    Frederick A. Beland;Nancy F. Fullerton;Robert H. Heflich

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick A. Beland
Frederick A. Beland National Center for Toxicological Research
Peter P. Fu
Peter P. Fu United States Food and Drug Administration
Daniel A. Casciano
Daniel A. Casciano University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Carl E. Cerniglia
Carl E. Cerniglia United States Food and Drug Administration
Martha M. Moore
Martha M. Moore National Center for Toxicological Research
Stephen D. Dertinger
Stephen D. Dertinger University of Rochester
Daniel R. Doerge
Daniel R. Doerge United States Food and Drug Administration
David Kirkland
David Kirkland Covance (United States)
Takehiko Nohmi
Takehiko Nohmi Gifu University
Fred F. Kadlubar
Fred F. Kadlubar United States Food and Drug Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Molecular Biology often explore interdisciplinary career pathways in health and science. If you’re considering applying your molecular biology background to clinical roles, several options exist to ease your transition, even if your previous major was unrelated.

For those interested in speech-language pathology, you may consider online transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors programs. These bridge pathways allow non-communication sciences students to gain the prerequisites needed for graduate study. Similarly, aspiring nurses can look into accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, which offer an efficient route to earning a BSN degree.

If you wish to build on your education further, becoming a nurse practitioner is a possible pathway. Learn about states with high earning potential through understanding psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state, and find out how long to become nurse practitioner if you’re planning your education timeline.

Exploring these online degree options can provide flexible learning, diverse career growth, and the chance to align your passion for molecular sciences with hands-on healthcare roles.

Best Scientists Citing Robert H. Heflich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles