World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 35 762 692 29 27 80 5343

Carolyn M. Hendriks publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carolyn M. Hendriks between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carolyn M. Hendriks published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2024. 15 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2024. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 11 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 2 publications
1992 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carolyn M. Hendriks: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 4
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 4
2002 3
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 1
2011 11
2012 4
2013 5
2014 0
2015 0
2016 4
2017 4
2018 4
2019 6
2020 12
2021 1
2022 3
2023 4
2024 13
2025 2
Total 108
Download as CSV

Carolyn M. Hendriks publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn M. Hendriks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 76–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 80 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79 80
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Carolyn M. Hendriks D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn M. Hendriks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72 35
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Carolyn M. Hendriks is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia and specializes in Social Sciences, focusing on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Communication, and Strategy and Management.

Their research covers various topics, including:

  • Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Labor Movements and Unions
  • Community Development and Social Impact
  • Policy Transfer and Learning
  • European Union Policy and Governance

Recent publications by Carolyn M. Hendriks span key journals and cover diverse themes in political studies and governance. Notable papers include:

  • "Citizens' Governance Spaces: Democratic Action Through Disruptive Collective Problem-Solving," published in 2021 in Political Studies
  • "Citizen-Led Democratic Change: How Australia's Community Independents Movement Is Reshaping Representative Democracy," published in 2023 in Political Studies
  • "Shadow Representation: Making Claims to Represent Better Than the Official Representative," published in 2024 in Representation

Other recent collaborative works involving Hendriks include "Political boundary spanning: politicians at the interface between collaborative governance and representative democracy" by Eva Sørensen in 2020 in Policy and Society. Hendriks has also contributed to publications such as the Australian Journal of Political Science.

Frequent co-authors working alongside Hendriks include:

  • Richard Reid
  • Selen A. Ercan
  • John Boswell
  • Albert W. Dzur
  • Anika Gauja

Among publication venues favored by Hendriks, Political Studies features prominently alongside DataverseNL, Policy and Society, Representation, and the Australian Journal of Political Science.

Hendriks has also authored a book titled Mending Democracy: Democratic Repair in Disconnected Times, published by the University of Southampton in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society's Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy:

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research

    Nicole Curato;John S. Dryzek;Selen A. Ercan;Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: the Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability

    Carolyn M. Hendriks;John Grin

  • Material Flow Analysis: A tool to support environmental policy decision making. Case-studies on the city of Vienna and the Swiss lowlands

    Carolyn Hendriks;Richard Obernosterer;Daniel Müller;Susanne Kytzia

  • Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems: The role of institutional design

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Turning up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation:

    Carolyn M. Hendriks;John S. Dryzek;Christian Hunold

  • Institutions of Deliberative Democratic Processes and Interest Groups: Roles, Tensions and Incentives

    Carolyn Hendriks

  • When the Forum Meets Interest Politics: Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Deliberative governance in the context of power

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • On inclusion and network governance: the democratic disconnect of Dutch energy transitions

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Can the market help the forum? Negotiating the commercialization of deliberative democracy

    Carolyn M. Hendriks;Lyn Carson

  • The Politics of Public Deliberation: Citizen Engagement and Interest Advocacy

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Message received? Examining transmission in deliberative systems

    John Boswell;Carolyn M. Hendriks;Selen A. Ercan

  • Political Leaders and Public Engagement: The Hidden World of Informal Elite–Citizen Interaction:

    Carolyn M Hendriks;Jennifer Lees-Marshment

  • Studying public deliberation after the systemic turn: the crucial role for interpretive research

    Selen A. Ercan;Carolyn M. Hendriks;John Boswell

  • The Democratic Soup: mixed meanings of political representation in governance networks

    Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • Environmental Decision-Making: Exploring Complexity and Context

    Carolyn Hendriks;Ronnie Harding;Mehreen Faruqi

  • Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty

    Selen A Ercan;Carolyn M Hendriks;John S Dryzek

  • Performing politics on social media: The dramaturgy of an environmental controversy on Facebook

    Carolyn M. Hendriks;Sonya Duus;Selen A. Ercan

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Dryzek
John S. Dryzek University of Canberra
Simon Niemeyer
Simon Niemeyer University of Canberra
Adrian Kay
Adrian Kay Australian National University
John Grin
John Grin University of Amsterdam
Jurian Edelenbos
Jurian Edelenbos Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eva Sørensen
Eva Sørensen Roskilde University
Daniel Müller
Daniel Müller Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Jennifer Lees-Marshment
Jennifer Lees-Marshment University of Dundee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open doors to a wide network of academic and professional opportunities. Many students also consider related fields that offer diverse career options, especially as more programs are now available online.

For example, those interested in environmental policy or advocacy may want to explore high paying jobs for environmental studies majors. If you have strong analytical abilities, earning a bachelor of mathematics online can lead to career paths in data analysis, research, or even policy advising.

Political Science also intersects closely with research and information management. Pursuing the top library science programs can prepare you for roles in archives, think tanks, or government libraries. Additionally, learning how to get a history degree can broaden your understanding of political contexts and prepare you for work in education, museums, or civil service.

These alternatives and complementary paths can significantly enhance your expertise and widen your career prospects after studying Political Science.

Best Scientists Citing Carolyn M. Hendriks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles