World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rebekah Ruth Brown

Rebekah Ruth Brown

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
11952
World Ranking
4893
National Ranking
172

Rebekah Ruth Brown publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebekah Ruth Brown sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Rebekah Ruth Brown D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebekah Ruth Brown sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Rebekah Ruth Brown is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and works primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their research focuses on a variety of subfields including Water Science and Technology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Global and Planetary Change, Ocean Engineering, and Environmental Engineering.

The main topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Water Resources and Sustainability
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Rebekah Ruth Brown has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • Transforming Cities through Water-Sensitive Principles and Practices, 2020, One Earth
  • Water Sensitive Cities Index: A diagnostic tool to assess water sensitivity and guide management actions, 2020, Water Research
  • Study design, rationale and methods of the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environments (RISE) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate environmental and human health impacts of a water-sensitive intervention in informal settlements in Indonesia and Fiji, 2021, BMJ Open
  • A planetary health model for reducing exposure to faecal contamination in urban informal settlements: Baseline findings from Makassar, Indonesia, 2021, Environment International
  • Monitoring of diverse enteric pathogens across environmental and host reservoirs with TaqMan array cards and standard qPCR: a methodological comparison study, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rebekah Ruth Brown include:

  • Tony Wong
  • Karin Leder
  • Briony Rogers
  • Rebekah Henry
  • Wikke Novalia

The scientist publishes often in venues such as:

  • Environment International
  • One Earth
  • Water Research
  • BMJ Open
  • The Lancet Planetary Health

Best Publications

  • Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes.

    Rebekah Ruth Brown;Nina Keath;Tony Wong

  • Impediments and Solutions to Sustainable, Watershed-Scale Urban Stormwater Management: Lessons from Australia and the United States

    Allison H Roy;Seth J Wenger;Timothy Fletcher;Christopher John Walsh;Christopher John Walsh

  • Taking the “Waste” Out of “Wastewater” for Human Water Security and Ecosystem Sustainability

    Stanley B Grant;Stanley B Grant;Jean-Daniel Saphores;David L Feldman;Andrew J Hamilton

  • The water sensitive city: principles for practice.

    Tony Wong;Rebekah Ruth Brown

  • Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face.

    Rebekah Ruth Brown;Megan Farrelly

  • Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward?

    Megan Farrelly;Rebekah Brown

  • Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: The case of Melbourne's stormwater management

    Rebekah Ruth Brown;Megan Farrelly;Derk Albert Loorbach

  • Impediments to Integrated Urban Stormwater Management: The Need for Institutional Reform

    Rebekah Ruth Brown

  • Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational

    Jeroen Rijke;Jeroen Rijke;Jeroen Rijke;Rebekah Ruth Brown;Chris Zevenbergen;Chris Zevenbergen;Richard M Ashley

  • Interdisciplinarity: How to catalyse collaboration

    Rebekah Ruth Brown;Ana Deletic;Tony Hoong Fatt Wong

  • Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector

    Joannette Jacqueline Bos;Rebekah Ruth Brown

  • Towards understanding governance for sustainable urban water management.

    S.J. van de Meene;S.J. van de Meene;R.R. Brown;M.A. Farrelly

  • Configuring transformative governance to enhance resilient urban water systems

    Jeroen Rijke;Jeroen Rijke;Jeroen Rijke;Megan Farrelly;Rebekah Ruth Brown;Chris Zevenbergen;Chris Zevenbergen

  • A strategic program for transitioning to a Water Sensitive City

    Briony Cathryn Ferguson;Niki Frantzeskaki;Rebekah Ruth Brown

  • Transitioning to Water Sensitive Cities: Historical Current and Future Transition States

    Rebekah Ruth Brown;Nina Keath;Tony Wong

  • Local Institutional Development and Organizational Change for Advancing Sustainable Urban Water Futures

    Rebekah Ruth Brown

  • A design framework for creating social learning situations

    Joannette Jacqueline Bos;Rebekah Ruth Brown;Megan Farrelly

  • The enabling institutional context for integrated water management: Lessons from Melbourne

    Briony Cathryn Ferguson;Rebekah Ruth Brown;Rebekah Ruth Brown;Niki Frantzeskaki;Fjalar Johannes de Haan

  • The needs of society: A new understanding of transitions, sustainability and liveability

    Fjalar J. de Haan;Briony C. Ferguson;Rachelle C. Adamowicz;Phillip Johnstone

  • An investigation of champion-driven leadership processes

    Andre Taylor;Christopher Cocklin;Rebekah Brown;Elisabeth Wilson-Evered

Frequent Co-Authors

Ana Deletic
Ana Deletic Queensland University of Technology
David Thomas McCarthy
David Thomas McCarthy Monash University
Tim D. Fletcher
Tim D. Fletcher University of Melbourne
Niki Frantzeskaki
Niki Frantzeskaki Utrecht University
Stephen P. Luby
Stephen P. Luby Stanford University
Chris Cocklin
Chris Cocklin James Cook University
Steven L. Chown
Steven L. Chown Monash University
Chris Zevenbergen
Chris Zevenbergen IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
Christopher J. Walsh
Christopher J. Walsh University of Melbourne
Pascale Allotey
Pascale Allotey United Nations University Institute on Globalization, Culture and Mobility

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career options and provide specialized skills. Many aspiring professionals look for a budget friendly online general studies degree as a flexible starting point. These programs offer broad knowledge bases and lower costs, helping students tailor their education while managing expenses.

If you're searching for a straightforward degree option, exploring what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insight into programs that balance workload and accessibility. Such degrees might serve as a practical foundation before specializing in environmental fields.

For a more focused approach, consider degrees in geology or geosciences. Many universities offer geology degrees online, blending earth science fundamentals with environmental applications. This path is ideal for roles in resource management, environmental consulting, or hazard assessment.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), critical for mapping and environmental analysis. The best GIS schools provide specialized training that prepares students for careers involving spatial data interpretation, supporting decision-making in sustainability and conservation efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Rebekah Ruth Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles