World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
8532
World Ranking
6518
National Ranking
2884

Roger B. Dannenberg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger B. Dannenberg sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 240 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roger B. Dannenberg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger B. Dannenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roger B. Dannenberg is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the broad field of Computer Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human-Computer Interaction.

The core topics of their work center on Music and Audio Processing, Music Technology and Sound Studies, and Neuroscience and Music Perception. Additional areas of interest include Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Speech and Audio Processing, Interactive and Immersive Displays, and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems.

Throughout their career, Roger B. Dannenberg has published extensively, contributing to a wide range of respected venues. Frequent publication venues for their work consist of:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of New Music Research
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • Sensors

Their recent published papers demonstrate ongoing research in acoustic music understanding, melody generation, and algorithmic composition. Notable recent papers include:

  • "MERT: Acoustic Music Understanding Model with Large-Scale Self-supervised Training" (2023), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Personalised Popular Music Generation Using Imitation and Structure" (2022), Journal of New Music Research
  • "Controllable Deep Melody Generation via Hierarchical Music Structure Representation" (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Controllable Deep Melody Generation via Hierarchical Music Structure Representation" (2021), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "The Beauty of Repetition: An Algorithmic Composition Model With Motif-Level Repetition Generator and Outline-to-Music Generator in Symbolic Music Generation" (2023), IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Roger B. Dannenberg has collaborated frequently with several researchers, reflecting a collaborative approach to their work. Among their most frequent co-authors are:

  • Shuqi Dai
  • Chenghua Lin
  • Gus Xia
  • Ruibin Yuan

The areas of study and publication history indicate a strong emphasis on integrating computational methods with music and audio analysis. Their contributions span theoretical and applied research aimed at understanding and generating music through advanced machine learning and signal processing techniques.

Best Publications

  • Garnet: comprehensive support for graphical, highly interactive user interfaces

    Brad A. Myers;Dario A. Giuse;Roger B. Dannenberg;Brad Vander Zanden

  • An On-Line Algorithm for Real-Time Accompaniment

    Roger B. Dannenberg

  • Polyphonic audio matching and alignment for music retrieval

    Ning Hu;R.B. Dannenberg;G. Tzanetakis

  • Pattern Discovery Techniques for Music Audio

    Roger B. Dannenberg;Ning Hu

  • TagATune: A Game for Music and Sound Annotation.

    Edith L. M. Law;Luis von Ahn;Roger B. Dannenberg;Mike Crawford

  • Multimedia interface design

    Meera M. Blattner;Roger B. Dannenberg

  • Music Representation Issues,Techniques,and Systems

    Roger B. Dannenberg

  • A Machine Learning Approach to Musical Style Recognition

    Roger B Dannenberg;Belinda Thom;David Watson

  • Tracking Musical Beats in Real Time.

    Paul E. Allen;Roger B. Dannenberg

  • Music score alignment and computer accompaniment

    Roger B. Dannenberg;Christopher Raphael

  • Creating graphical interactive application objects by demonstration

    B. A. Myers;B. V. Zanden;R. B. Dannenberg

  • The MUSART Testbed for Query-by-Humming Evaluation

    Roger B. Dannenberg;William P. Birmingham;George P. Tzanetakis;Colin P. Meek

  • Method and apparatus for interactive audience participation by audio command

    Roger B. Dannenberg;Robert N. Fisher;Andrew P. Witkin

  • Polyphonic Audio Matching for Score Following and Intelligent Audio Editors

    Roger B. Dannenberg;Ning Hu

  • Real-Time Computer Accompaniment of Keyboard Performances

    Joshua J. Bloch;Roger B. Dannenberg

  • A comparative evaluation of search techniques for query-by-humming using the MUSART testbed

    Roger B. Dannenberg;William P. Birmingham;Bryan Pardo;Ning Hu

  • Following an improvisation in real time

    Roger B. Dannenberg;Bernard Mont-Reynaud

  • A computer‐based multi‐media tutor for beginning piano students

    Roger B. Dannenberg;Marta Sanchez;Annabelle Joseph;Peter Capell

  • A comparison of melodic database retrieval techniques using sung queries

    Ning Hu;Roger B. Dannenberg

  • SMERS: Music emotion recognition using support vector regression

    Byeong Jun Han;Seungmin Rho;Roger B. Dannenberg;Eenjun Hwang

Frequent Co-Authors

George Tzanetakis
George Tzanetakis University of Victoria
Brad A. Myers
Brad A. Myers Carnegie Mellon University
Bhiksha Raj
Bhiksha Raj Carnegie Mellon University
Masataka Goto
Masataka Goto National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Daniel P. Siewiorek
Daniel P. Siewiorek Carnegie Mellon University
Larry Wasserman
Larry Wasserman Carnegie Mellon University
Antonio Camurri
Antonio Camurri University of Genoa
Henkjan Honing
Henkjan Honing University of Amsterdam
Julius O. Smith
Julius O. Smith Stanford University
Atsuo Takanishi
Atsuo Takanishi Waseda University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to many interdisciplinary and specialized careers. For those who want to diversify their expertise, related online degrees can complement your skills and expand your professional options.

Interested in the legal side of technology? Pairing your studies with a criminal justice major can lead to roles in cybersecurity, digital forensics, or law enforcement technology. If you enjoy working with numbers and information systems, taking accounting classes online can prepare you for careers in fintech, data auditing, or company IT departments.

The growing demand for big data skills has made an online masters in data science a popular next step for Computer Science graduates. Similarly, if you want to apply technical skills to real-world projects, the best 2 year construction management degree online can launch you into smart construction and engineering roles.

These pathways allow you to tailor your education and enter fields that value tech-savvy professionals with broad, adaptable knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Roger B. Dannenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles