World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
51
Citations
13838
World Ranking
3774
National Ranking
1104

Julius O. Smith publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius O. Smith sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 356 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Julius O. Smith D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius O. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julius O. Smith is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of computer science and engineering, with significant contributions in signal processing, computer vision and pattern recognition, biomedical engineering, cognitive neuroscience, and computational mechanics.

The scientist's work spans several topics, including:

  • Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
  • Blind Source Separation Techniques

Julius O. Smith has actively contributed to numerous publications, especially in the domain of acoustic and audio engineering fields. Frequent publication venues where their work appears include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
  • Revue Francophone Informatique & Musique

Their recent published papers reflect detailed research into musical acoustics, signal processing, and audio engineering, including:

  • A landmark article on nonlinear time-domain modeling in musical acoustics (2021, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America)
  • Electric-to-acoustic pickup processing for string instruments: An experimental study of the guitar with a hexaphonic pickup (2021, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America)
  • State-space modeling of sound source directivity: An experimental study of the violin and the clarinet (2021, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America)
  • Improved Real-Time Monophonic Pitch Tracking with the Extended Complex Kalman Filter (2020, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society)
  • Augmenting a single-point laser Doppler vibrometer to perform scanning measurements (2022, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America)

Collaboration has been an important aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Gary Scavone, Mark Rau, Doug L. James, Jonathan S. Abel, and Esteban Maestre.

Best Publications

  • System and methods for recognizing sound and music signals in high noise and distortion

    Avery Li-Chun Wang;Julius O. Smith

  • Closed-form least-squares source location estimation from range-difference measurements

    J. Smith;J. Abel

  • Physical Modeling Using Digital Waveguides

    Julius O. Smith

  • Spectral modeling synthesis: A sound analysis/synthesis based on a deterministic plus stochastic decomposition

    Xavier Serra;Julius O. Smith

  • Introduction to Digital Filters: with Audio Applications

    Julius Orion Smith

  • Bark and ERB bilinear transforms

    J.O. Smith;J.S. Abel

  • Extensions of the Karplus-Strong Plucked-String Algorithm

    David A. Jaffe;Julius O. Smith

  • PARSHL: An analysis/synthesis program for non-harmonic sounds based on a sinusoidal representation

    Julius O. Smith;Xavier Serra

  • Fifty Years of Artificial Reverberation

    V. Valimaki;J. D. Parker;L. Savioja;J. O. Smith

  • Physical Modeling with the 2-D Digital Waveguide Mesh

    Scott A. Van Duyne;Julius O. Smith Iii

  • The spherical interpolation method of source localization

    J. Smith;J. Abel

  • Viewpoints on the History of Digital Synthesis

    Julius Orion Smith

  • Physical Modeling Synthesis Update

    Julius O. Smith

  • A flexible sampling-rate conversion method

    J. Smith;P. Gossett

  • Circulant and elliptic feedback delay networks for artificial reverberation

    D. Rocchesso;J.O. Smith

  • The simulation of piano string vibration: from physical models to finite difference schemes and digital waveguides.

    Julien Bensa;Stefan Bilbao;Richard Kronland-Martinet;Julius O. Smith

  • Audio representations for data compression and compressed domain processing

    Julius Orion Smith;Scott Nathan Levine

  • Analysis and performance evaluation of an adaptive notch filter

    B. Friedlander;J. Smith

  • The 2-D digital waveguide mesh

    S. Van Duyne;J.O. Smith

  • Automated Physical Modeling of Nonlinear Audio Circuits For Real-Time Audio Effects—Part I: Theoretical Development

    David T Yeh;Jonathan S Abel;Julius O Smith

  • Digital signal processing using waveguide networks

    Julius O. Smith

  • DAFX—Digital Audio Effects

    Julius O. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Vesa Välimäki
Vesa Välimäki Aalto University
Benjamin Friedlander
Benjamin Friedlander University of California, Santa Cruz
Perry R. Cook
Perry R. Cook Princeton University
Xavier Serra
Xavier Serra Pompeu Fabra University
Augusto Sarti
Augusto Sarti Polytechnic University of Milan
Matti Karjalainen
Matti Karjalainen Aalto University
Malcolm Slaney
Malcolm Slaney Stanford University
Roger B. Dannenberg
Roger B. Dannenberg Carnegie Mellon University
Jont B. Allen
Jont B. Allen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bernard Widrow
Bernard Widrow Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Julius O. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles