World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sander Nieuwenhuis

Sander Nieuwenhuis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2324 2120 129 123 180 28868
Neuroscience 69 2577 2355 83 78 215 29052

Sander Nieuwenhuis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sander Nieuwenhuis between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sander Nieuwenhuis published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 338 publications in 2010. 11 of the 529 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 338. Peak 338 publications in 2010. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 338 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

529 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sander Nieuwenhuis: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 4
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 7
2005 17
2006 3
2007 9
2008 3
2009 3
2010 338
2011 11
2012 5
2013 6
2014 8
2015 12
2016 15
2017 14
2018 6
2019 6
2020 2
2021 3
2022 7
2023 19
2024 8
2025 10
2026 1
Total 529
Download as CSV

Sander Nieuwenhuis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sander Nieuwenhuis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 180
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sander Nieuwenhuis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sander Nieuwenhuis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sander Nieuwenhuis is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with particular attention to cognitive neuroscience, neurology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics including:

  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms

Nieuwenhuis has contributed to several recent publications, notably:

  • "Pupil size reflects activation of subcortical ascending arousal system nuclei during rest," 2023, published in eLife
  • "Belief traps: Tackling the inertia of harmful beliefs," 2022, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Evidence for a modulating effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on salivary alpha-amylase as indirect noradrenergic marker: A pooled mega-analysis," 2022, published in Brain Stimulation
  • "Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality," 2020, published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Short-term transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation increases pupil size but does not affect EEG alpha power: A replication of Sharon et al. (2021, Journal of Neuroscience)," 2023, published in Brain Stimulation

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Beth Lloyd
  • Verónica Mäki-Marttunen
  • Franz Wurm
  • Roy de Kleijn
  • Federica Lucchi

Nieuwenhuis publishes regularly in several scientific venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Psychophysiology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control.

    K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Markus Ullsperger;Eveline A. Crone;Sander Nieuwenhuis

  • Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Gary Aston-Jones;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Wery van den Wildenberg;K. Richard Ridderinkhof

  • Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Jos Blom;Guido P.H. Band

  • Mental Training Affects Distribution of Limited Brain Resources

    Heleen A Slagter;Antoine Lutz;Lawrence L Greischar;Andrew D Francis

  • Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Birte U Forstmann;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function.

    Mark S. Gilzenrat;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Marieke Jepma;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff

    Rafal Bogacz;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Birte U. Forstmann;Sander Nieuwenhuis

  • Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures

    Greg Hajcak;Sander Nieuwenhuis

  • Dissociable components of error processing: On the functional significance of the Pe vis-à-vis the ERN/Ne

    Thérèse J.M. Overbeek;Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;K. Richard Ridderinkhof

  • Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Clay B Holroyd;Nisan Mol;Michael G.H Coles

  • Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals

    Clay B Holroyd;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Leigh Nystrom

  • Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation.

    Monicque M. Lorist;Merel Klein;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Ritske De Jong

  • The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Eco J. De Geus;Gary Aston-Jones

  • Pupil diameter predicts changes in the exploration-exploitation trade-off: evidence for the adaptive gain theory.

    Marieke Jepma;Sander Nieuwenhuis

  • Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms

    Lorenza S. Colzato;Maria Teresa Bajo;Wery van den Wildenberg;Daniela Paolieri

  • A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Durk Talsma;Michael G. H. Coles;Michael G. H. Coles

  • Sensitivity of Electrophysiological Activity from Medial Frontal Cortex to Utilitarian and Performance Feedback

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Clay B. Holroyd;Aaron Schurger

  • The Beneficial Effects of Additional Task Load, Positive Affect, and Instruction on the Attentional Blink.

    Christian N. L. Olivers;Sander Nieuwenhuis

  • The Beneficial Effect of Concurrent Task-Irrelevant Mental Activity on Temporal Attention

    Christian N.L. Olivers;Sander Nieuwenhuis

  • Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Heleen A. Slagter;Niels J. Alting von Geusau;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias H. Donner
Tobias H. Donner Universität Hamburg
Nic J.A. van der Wee
Nic J.A. van der Wee Leiden University Medical Center
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts Leiden University
Birte U. Forstmann
Birte U. Forstmann University of Amsterdam
Jos A. Bosch
Jos A. Bosch University of Amsterdam
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Heleen A. Slagter
Heleen A. Slagter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henk van Steenbergen
Henk van Steenbergen Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in Psychology can lead to a variety of rewarding careers, including becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Each state and even different cities have specific certification requirements, so it’s important to understand the process depending on your location.

For example, if you are interested in practicing in the Pittsburgh area, you’ll need to review the Pittsburgh mft certification requirements. Similarly, those aiming to practice in Texas can learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Plano.

In Florida, the Port St. Lucie mft certification requirements provide a detailed overview of state-specific prerequisites. If you plan to practice in the Pacific Northwest, familiarize yourself with the Portland mft certification requirements.

Understanding these region-specific career pathways is essential when pursuing your Psychology degree online, ensuring you meet all education and certification standards for your chosen career and location.

Best Scientists Citing Sander Nieuwenhuis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles