World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Redmond G O'Connell

Redmond G O'Connell

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
8821
World Ranking
7479
National Ranking
16

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
8835
World Ranking
7570
National Ranking
29

Redmond G O'Connell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Redmond G O'Connell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Redmond G O'Connell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Redmond G O'Connell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Redmond G O'Connell is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and has made contributions primarily to the field of Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. Their work spans several related subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Decision Sciences, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research covers a range of topics including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Redmond G O'Connell has published extensively, with recent papers including:

  • "Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception" (2020) in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • "Neurocomputational mechanisms of prior-informed perceptual decision-making in humans" (2020) in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Neurophysiology of Human Perceptual Decision-Making" (2021) in Annual Review of Neuroscience
  • "Model-Based Planning Deficits in Compulsivity Are Linked to Faulty Neural Representations of Task Structure" (2021) in Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Evidence accumulation during perceptual decisions in humans varies as a function of dorsal frontoparietal organization" (2020) in Nature Human Behaviour

Most frequent co-authors include:

  • Simon P. Kelly
  • Mark A. Bellgrove
  • Elaine A. Corbett
  • Shou-Han Zhou
  • Kevin Walsh

They have published frequently in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • eLife
  • Imaging Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus.

    Peter R. Murphy;Redmond G. O'Connell;Michael O'Sullivan;Ian H. Robertson

  • A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans.

    Redmond G O'Connell;Paul M Dockree;Simon P Kelly

  • Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus–noradrenergic arousal function in humans

    Peter R. Murphy;Ian H. Robertson;Joshua H. Balsters;Redmond G. O'connell

  • Internal and External Influences on the Rate of Sensory Evidence Accumulation in the Human Brain

    Simon P. Kelly;Redmond G. O'Connell

  • The role of cingulate cortex in the detection of errors with and without awareness: a high-density electrical mapping study.

    Redmond G. O'Connell;Paul M. Dockree;Paul M. Dockree;Mark A. Bellgrove;Simon P. Kelly;Simon P. Kelly

  • The classic P300 encodes a build-to-threshold decision variable.

    Deirdre M. Twomey;Peter R. Murphy;Simon P. Kelly;Redmond G. O'Connell

  • Uncovering the Neural Signature of Lapsing Attention: Electrophysiological Signals Predict Errors up to 20 s before They Occur

    Redmond G O'Connell;Paul Dockree;Ian H Robertson;Mark Andrew Bellgrove

  • Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception

    Kevin S. Walsh;David P. McGovern;David P. McGovern;Andy Clark;Redmond G. O'Connell

  • Bridging Neural and Computational Viewpoints on Perceptual Decision-Making.

    Redmond G. O’Connell;Michael N. Shadlen;Michael N. Shadlen;KongFatt Wong-Lin;Simon P. Kelly

  • The Molecular Genetics of Executive Function: Role of Monoamine System Genes

    Jessica Jane Margaret Barnes;Angela J Dean;L Sanjay Nandam;Redmond O'Connell

  • Retest reliability of event-related potentials: evidence from a variety of paradigms.

    Sarah M. Cassidy;Ian H. Robertson;Redmond G. O'Connell

  • Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments

    Peter R Murphy;Ian H Robertson;Siobhán Harty;Redmond G O'Connell

  • The neural correlates of deficient error awareness in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

    Redmond G O'Connell;Mark Andrew Bellgrove;Paul Dockree;Paul Dockree;Adam Lau

  • Decisions are expedited through multiple neural adjustments spanning the sensorimotor hierarchy

    Natalie A. Steinemann;Redmond G. O’Connell;Simon P. Kelly;Simon P. Kelly

  • Self-Alert Training: volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention.

    Redmond G O'Connell;Mark Andrew Bellgrove;Paul Dockree;Adam Lau

  • ERP measures indicate both attention and working memory encoding decrements in aging

    Simon Finnigan;Simon Finnigan;Redmond G. O'Connell;Tarrant D. R. Cummins;Megan Broughton

  • A simultaneous ERP/fMRI investigation of the P300 aging effect

    Redmond G. O'Connell;Joshua H. Balsters;Sophia M. Kilcullen;William Campbell

  • Two types of action error: Electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks

    Redmond G. O'Connell;Paul M. Dockree;Mark A. Bellgrove;Alessandra Turin

  • Target Selection Signals Influence Perceptual Decisions by Modulating the Onset and Rate of Evidence Accumulation

    Gerard M. Loughnane;Daniel P. Newman;Mark A. Bellgrove;Edmund C. Lalor

  • The neural processes underlying perceptual decision making in humans: recent progress and future directions.

    Simon P. Kelly;Redmond G. O’Connell

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Bellgrove
Mark A. Bellgrove Monash University
Simon P. Kelly
Simon P. Kelly University College Dublin
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin
John J. Foxe
John J. Foxe University of Rochester
Robert Hester
Robert Hester University of Melbourne
Joshua H. Balsters
Joshua H. Balsters Royal Holloway University of London
Pradeep J. Nathan
Pradeep J. Nathan University of Cambridge
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Jessica Bramham
Jessica Bramham University College Dublin
Robert Whelan
Robert Whelan Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a future in neuroscience, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can open up diverse opportunities. Many students look for online certifications that pay well as a way to complement their neuroscience background and broaden their career prospects in areas like data science, healthcare technology, or clinical research.

Flexibility is another key factor. For those seeking to balance studies with work, choosing among the easiest online degree programs can help you build relevant skills without overwhelming your schedule.

Affordability is also crucial for many students. If you are looking into specialized areas like social work or behavioral analysis, you might be interested in the cheap online msw programs for mental health or the online bcba masters programs for behavior analysis, both of which can offer a great return on investment.

Exploring these online options can make a neuroscience-inspired career more accessible and rewarding, tailored to your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Redmond G O'Connell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles