World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
8399
World Ranking
8691
National Ranking
646

Joshua H. Balsters publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua H. Balsters sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Joshua H. Balsters D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua H. Balsters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joshua H. Balsters is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience and psychology, with particular expertise in cognitive neuroscience and related subfields.

Their scholarly output includes contributions to topics such as functional brain connectivity studies, behavioral health and interventions, decision-making and behavioral economics, neural and behavioral psychology studies, motor control and adaptation, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Valerio Zerbi, Nicole Wenderoth, Jérôme Sallet, Rogier B. Mars, and Louisa Thomas.

Their work has appeared in a range of academic venues, including:

  • eLife
  • NeuroImage
  • Developmental Science
  • The Neuroscientist
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Joshua H. Balsters include:

  • Primate homologs of mouse cortico-striatal circuits, 2020, eLife
  • Imaging evolution of the primate brain: the next frontier?, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Are adolescents more optimal decision-makers in novel environments? Examining the benefits of heightened exploration in a patch foraging paradigm, 2020, Developmental Science
  • Shedding Light on Social Reward Circuitry: (Un)common Blueprints in Humans and Rodents, 2020, The Neuroscientist
  • Contagion of Temporal Discounting Value Preferences in Neurotypical and Autistic Adults, 2021, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Best Publications

  • A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum

    Jörn Diedrichsen;Joshua H. Balsters;Jonathan Flavell;Emma Cussans

  • The Dynamics of Functional Brain Networks: Integrated Network States during Cognitive Task Performance

    James M. Shine;James M. Shine;Patrick G. Bissett;Peter T. Bell;Oluwasanmi Oluseye Koyejo

  • Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus.

    Peter R. Murphy;Redmond G. O'Connell;Michael O'Sullivan;Ian H. Robertson

  • Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II

    Adriana Di Martino;David O'Connor;David O'Connor;Bosi Chen;Kaat Alaerts

  • Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus–noradrenergic arousal function in humans

    Peter R. Murphy;Ian H. Robertson;Joshua H. Balsters;Redmond G. O'connell

  • Evolution of the cerebellar cortex: the selective expansion of prefrontal-projecting cerebellar lobules.

    Joshua H. Balsters;Emma Cussans;Jörn Diedrichsen;Kimberley A. Phillips

  • Beyond Autism: Introducing the Dialectical Misattunement Hypothesis and a Bayesian Account of Intersubjectivity.

    Dimitris Bolis;Joshua Balsters;Nicole Wenderoth;Cristina Becchio

  • Social and monetary reward processing in autism spectrum disorders

    Sonja Delmonte;Joshua H Balsters;Jane McGrath;Jacqueline Fitzgerald

  • Functional and structural connectivity of frontostriatal circuitry in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

    Sonja Delmonte;Louise Gallagher;Erik O'Hanlon;Jane McGrath

  • Cerebellum and Cognition: Evidence for the Encoding of Higher Order Rules

    Joshua H. Balsters;Christopher D. Whelan;Ian H. Robertson;Narender Ramnani

  • Structural Basis of Large-Scale Functional Connectivity in the Mouse.

    Joanes Grandjean;Joanes Grandjean;Valerio Zerbi;Joshua Henk Balsters;Joshua Henk Balsters;Nicole Wenderoth;Nicole Wenderoth

  • A simultaneous ERP/fMRI investigation of the P300 aging effect

    Redmond G. O'Connell;Joshua H. Balsters;Sophia M. Kilcullen;William Campbell

  • The role of the midcingulate cortex in monitoring others' decisions.

    Matthew A J Apps;Matthew A J Apps;Patricia L Lockwood;Joshua H Balsters;Joshua H Balsters

  • Cerebellar atrophy in Parkinson’s disease and its implication for network connectivity

    Claire O’Callaghan;Claire O’Callaghan;Michael Hornberger;Joshua H. Balsters;Glenda M. Halliday;Glenda M. Halliday

  • Personality modulates the effects of emotional arousal and valence on brain activation

    Elizabeth G. Kehoe;John M. Toomey;Joshua H. Balsters;Arun L. W. Bokde

  • Bridging the gap between functional and anatomical features of cortico-cerebellar circuits using meta-analytic connectivity modeling.

    Joshua H. Balsters;Joshua H. Balsters;Angela R. Laird;Peter T. Fox;Peter T. Fox;Simon B. Eickhoff;Simon B. Eickhoff

  • Cerebellar Plasticity and the Automation of First-Order Rules

    Joshua H Balsters;Narender Ramnani

  • Estimating a neutral reference for electroencephalographic recordings: the importance of using a high-density montage and a realistic head model

    Quanying Liu;Joshua H Balsters;Joshua H Balsters;Marc Baechinger;Onno van der Groen

  • Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example.

    Pegah Kassraian-Fard;Caroline Matthis;Joshua H. Balsters;Marloes H. Maathuis

  • Coupling of respiration and attention via the locus coeruleus: Effects of meditation and pranayama

    Michael Christopher Melnychuk;Paul M. Dockree;Redmond G. O'Connell;Peter R. Murphy

  • Primate homologs of mouse cortico-striatal circuits

    Joshua Henk Balsters;Joshua Henk Balsters;Valerio Zerbi;Jerome Sallet;Nicole Wenderoth

Frequent Co-Authors

Dante Mantini
Dante Mantini KU Leuven
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin
Narender Ramnani
Narender Ramnani Royal Holloway University of London
Redmond G O'Connell
Redmond G O'Connell Trinity College Dublin
Rogier B. Mars
Rogier B. Mars University of Oxford
Surjo R. Soekadar
Surjo R. Soekadar Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Neil Upton
Neil Upton Transpharmation, UK
James M. Shine
James M. Shine University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying neuroscience, exploring accelerated online programs can be a great way to earn your degree faster. These flexible options allow students to balance coursework with other commitments and often reduce the time to graduation.

Job prospects for neuroscience majors are strong, especially when you consider fields related to healthcare, data science, and research. Graduates can pursue some of the highest paying bachelor degrees entry-level careers, such as in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and medical technical roles.

Many of the highest paying jobs are in the sciences and technology sectors, which welcome students with neuroscience backgrounds. Specializing or earning additional credentials can further boost earning potential and employment options.

Affordability is a concern for many students. Fortunately, there are online college courses with financial aid available, helping lower the cost of your degree and making advanced education more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua H. Balsters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles